http://www.ballot-access.org/2005/05/26/minnesota-eases-definition-of-party/ Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:09:27 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=5580 http://www.ballot-access.org/2005/05/26/minnesota-eases-definition-of-party/comment-page-1/#comment-70768 vsqqaiqksu Thu, 21 Jun 2007 05:07:42 +0000 http://ballot-access.org/2005/05/26/minnesota-eases-definition-of-party/#comment-70768 Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! vprarqglwnfqvd Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! vprarqglwnfqvd

]]> http://www.ballot-access.org/2005/05/26/minnesota-eases-definition-of-party/comment-page-1/#comment-851 Phil Fuehrer Mon, 13 Jun 2005 23:13:54 +0000 http://ballot-access.org/2005/05/26/minnesota-eases-definition-of-party/#comment-851 The "Ventura faction" is still around. It is the Independence Party of MN. It acheived the 5% in 1994 and has had a statewide candidate break that barrier each even numbered year since. Their website is www.mnip.org. The “Ventura faction” is still around. It is the Independence Party of MN. It acheived the 5% in 1994 and has had a statewide candidate break that barrier each even numbered year since. Their website is http://www.mnip.org.

]]> http://www.ballot-access.org/2005/05/26/minnesota-eases-definition-of-party/comment-page-1/#comment-843 arbitrary aardvark Thu, 02 Jun 2005 02:23:28 +0000 http://ballot-access.org/2005/05/26/minnesota-eases-definition-of-party/#comment-843 So the trick is to get 5% once, and then stay on by running the 72. I'm not sure the greens want to run 72, or that the LP could get 5%, but this might help the Ventura faction if they are still around. So the trick is to get 5% once, and then stay on by running the 72. I’m not sure the greens want to run 72, or that the LP could get 5%, but this might help the Ventura faction if they are still around.

]]>