<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Greens Qualify in Two More States</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2005/08/05/greens-qualify-in-two-more-states/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2005/08/05/greens-qualify-in-two-more-states/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:27:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=5756</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yakovlev1</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2005/08/05/greens-qualify-in-two-more-states/comment-page-1/#comment-3365</link>
		<dc:creator>Yakovlev1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 14:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ballot-access.org/2005/08/05/greens-qualify-in-two-more-states/#comment-3365</guid>
		<description>http://nexium-uex5.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://nexium-uex5.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://nexium-uex5.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vann</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2005/08/05/greens-qualify-in-two-more-states/comment-page-1/#comment-1647</link>
		<dc:creator>vann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 17:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ballot-access.org/2005/08/05/greens-qualify-in-two-more-states/#comment-1647</guid>
		<description>http://google-search-engine-k0g0.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://google-search-engine-k0g0.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://google-search-engine-k0g0.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike B</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2005/08/05/greens-qualify-in-two-more-states/comment-page-1/#comment-997</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2005 17:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ballot-access.org/2005/08/05/greens-qualify-in-two-more-states/#comment-997</guid>
		<description>You can buy pixels/blocks from the site and add your own banners/ads which contain link to your own page.
There is 1 million pixels in site and you can deside which place you purchase.

http://www.milliondollaroreuropage.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can buy pixels/blocks from the site and add your own banners/ads which contain link to your own page.<br />
There is 1 million pixels in site and you can deside which place you purchase.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.milliondollaroreuropage.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.milliondollaroreuropage.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Prindle</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2005/08/05/greens-qualify-in-two-more-states/comment-page-1/#comment-912</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Prindle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2005 02:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ballot-access.org/2005/08/05/greens-qualify-in-two-more-states/#comment-912</guid>
		<description>Last year, the party officer with the legal responsibility to communicate the name of the presidential nominee to the state elections office refused to do so because his faction thought Ralph Nader, who already had an independent ballot line, should have been the Green endorsee. The candidate who had the best chance of requalifying the party for ballot status was also a member of that faction, and she withdrew from her race; thus the new petition drives. The GPUS recognized the faction that had wanted David Cobb on the ballot as its legitimate affiliate.

I gather that there are long-standing differences about internal decision-making procedures as well, as is often the case in the Green Party. There was already a split a while ago that led to some prominent Greens joining the Democrats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last year, the party officer with the legal responsibility to communicate the name of the presidential nominee to the state elections office refused to do so because his faction thought Ralph Nader, who already had an independent ballot line, should have been the Green endorsee. The candidate who had the best chance of requalifying the party for ballot status was also a member of that faction, and she withdrew from her race; thus the new petition drives. The GPUS recognized the faction that had wanted David Cobb on the ballot as its legitimate affiliate.</p>
<p>I gather that there are long-standing differences about internal decision-making procedures as well, as is often the case in the Green Party. There was already a split a while ago that led to some prominent Greens joining the Democrats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D.C. Finegold Sachs</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2005/08/05/greens-qualify-in-two-more-states/comment-page-1/#comment-909</link>
		<dc:creator>D.C. Finegold Sachs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2005 19:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ballot-access.org/2005/08/05/greens-qualify-in-two-more-states/#comment-909</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t tell you the difference between the two factions of the Green Party, but I can provide you the URL to their web sites.
http://www.gput.org/index.shtml is the party affiliated with the National Green Party.  

http://www.greenpartyofutah.org/ is the unaffiliated party</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t tell you the difference between the two factions of the Green Party, but I can provide you the URL to their web sites.<br />
<a href="http://www.gput.org/index.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.gput.org/index.shtml</a> is the party affiliated with the National Green Party.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.greenpartyofutah.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.greenpartyofutah.org/</a> is the unaffiliated party</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle B</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2005/08/05/greens-qualify-in-two-more-states/comment-page-1/#comment-907</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2005 19:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ballot-access.org/2005/08/05/greens-qualify-in-two-more-states/#comment-907</guid>
		<description>Whats the difference between these two factions other then the fact that one has the backing of the national green party?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whats the difference between these two factions other then the fact that one has the backing of the national green party?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

