<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Texas Ballot Access Victory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2006/01/28/texas-ballot-access-victory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2006/01/28/texas-ballot-access-victory/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:46:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=8306</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Rausch</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2006/01/28/texas-ballot-access-victory/comment-page-1/#comment-1178</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Rausch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 00:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ballot-access.org/2006/01/28/texas-ballot-access-victory/#comment-1178</guid>
		<description>The Republican-controlled Texas Supreme Court probably would have used the same logic if the slighted candidates before the Court had been Democrats.  It would be interesting to see whether any of the Justices running for reelection (or election if they were appointed by the governor) have opponents who discuss this type of case.  There were a number of Republican challengers to Republican incumbents who also were kept off the ballot by the state Republican Party, but were allowed back on by the Supreme Court.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Republican-controlled Texas Supreme Court probably would have used the same logic if the slighted candidates before the Court had been Democrats.  It would be interesting to see whether any of the Justices running for reelection (or election if they were appointed by the governor) have opponents who discuss this type of case.  There were a number of Republican challengers to Republican incumbents who also were kept off the ballot by the state Republican Party, but were allowed back on by the Supreme Court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Jagge</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2006/01/28/texas-ballot-access-victory/comment-page-1/#comment-1131</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Jagge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 19:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ballot-access.org/2006/01/28/texas-ballot-access-victory/#comment-1131</guid>
		<description>Yes, but would the Republican controlled Supreme Court have used similar logic had the issue not been Republican campaigns?  I guess setting the precedent is good though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but would the Republican controlled Supreme Court have used similar logic had the issue not been Republican campaigns?  I guess setting the precedent is good though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

