<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Peace &amp; Freedom Party Threatened</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2006/01/31/peace-freedom-party-threatened/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2006/01/31/peace-freedom-party-threatened/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:27:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=9307</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Citizens For A Better Veterans Home</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2006/01/31/peace-freedom-party-threatened/comment-page-1/#comment-1132</link>
		<dc:creator>Citizens For A Better Veterans Home</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 20:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ballot-access.org/2006/01/31/peace-freedom-party-threatened/#comment-1132</guid>
		<description>FROM:  www.peaceandfreedom2006.org


 &quot;candidate or other activist, please check out our page of resources.
Vote Peace and Freedom Party, for peace, freedom and justice!

On January 24, 2006, a letter from Peace and Freedom Party State Chairperson Kevin Akin was delivered to Secretary of State Bruce McPherson&#039;s office, requesting that he place an internal referendum on the party&#039;s June primary ballot in accordance with a longstanding provision of the Peace and Freedom Party&#039;s bylaws. This is the text of the referendum question:

    We call for an immediate end to the occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan and the immediate and unconditional withdrawal of all U.S. forces from those countries; and

    We further call on all California members of congress to vote against all appropriations that include funding for the continued occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan; and

    We further call for the withdrawal of the California National Guard from combat-related operations outside the United States.

    This position of the Peace and Freedom Party shall be adopted by our nominated candidates in their campaigns, and in office if they are elected.

Secretary of State McPherson&#039;s response was to claim a week later that Peace and Freedom was no longer a ballot-qualified party eligible to participate in the June primary. Since his decision was contrary to the plain language of the law and to four earlier decisions in comparable situations by previous Secretaries of State (most recently by Bill Jones in 1998), he must have had some other reason than &quot;just following the law&quot;. If his motive wasn&#039;t to prevent Peace and Freedom Party registrants from voting against the war, what was it?

Once the courts correct the situation, all California voters will have the chance to vote against the war by voting in November for Peace and Freedom Party candidates.&quot;

Post Script by former P&amp;F party member:
&quot;You&#039;ll notice that the party&#039;s index page * has a large, prominent anti Schwarzenegger piece on it. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm&quot;

* www.peaceandfreedom.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FROM:  <a href="http://www.peaceandfreedom2006.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.peaceandfreedom2006.org</a></p>
<p> &#8220;candidate or other activist, please check out our page of resources.<br />
Vote Peace and Freedom Party, for peace, freedom and justice!</p>
<p>On January 24, 2006, a letter from Peace and Freedom Party State Chairperson Kevin Akin was delivered to Secretary of State Bruce McPherson&#8217;s office, requesting that he place an internal referendum on the party&#8217;s June primary ballot in accordance with a longstanding provision of the Peace and Freedom Party&#8217;s bylaws. This is the text of the referendum question:</p>
<p>    We call for an immediate end to the occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan and the immediate and unconditional withdrawal of all U.S. forces from those countries; and</p>
<p>    We further call on all California members of congress to vote against all appropriations that include funding for the continued occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan; and</p>
<p>    We further call for the withdrawal of the California National Guard from combat-related operations outside the United States.</p>
<p>    This position of the Peace and Freedom Party shall be adopted by our nominated candidates in their campaigns, and in office if they are elected.</p>
<p>Secretary of State McPherson&#8217;s response was to claim a week later that Peace and Freedom was no longer a ballot-qualified party eligible to participate in the June primary. Since his decision was contrary to the plain language of the law and to four earlier decisions in comparable situations by previous Secretaries of State (most recently by Bill Jones in 1998), he must have had some other reason than &#8220;just following the law&#8221;. If his motive wasn&#8217;t to prevent Peace and Freedom Party registrants from voting against the war, what was it?</p>
<p>Once the courts correct the situation, all California voters will have the chance to vote against the war by voting in November for Peace and Freedom Party candidates.&#8221;</p>
<p>Post Script by former P&amp;F party member:<br />
&#8220;You&#8217;ll notice that the party&#8217;s index page * has a large, prominent anti Schwarzenegger piece on it. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm&#8221;</p>
<p>* <a href="http://www.peaceandfreedom.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.peaceandfreedom.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Citizens For A Better Veterans Home</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2006/01/31/peace-freedom-party-threatened/comment-page-1/#comment-1130</link>
		<dc:creator>Citizens For A Better Veterans Home</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 19:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ballot-access.org/2006/01/31/peace-freedom-party-threatened/#comment-1130</guid>
		<description>WELL IT LOOKS LIKE SOME ONE 
AT THE SACRAMENTO BEE
LOOKS IN ON BALLOT ACCESS NEWS
ON A REGULAR BASIS.......

x - close Recent Stories By Dan Smith


Party falls off ballot
By Dan Smith -- Bee Capitol Bureau
Published 2:15 am PST Wednesday, February 1, 2006
Story appeared on Page A5 of The Bee
The Peace and Freedom Party has failed to qualify as an official party in California for the June 6 election, Secretary of State Bruce McPherson announced Tuesday.

To maintain qualified status, a party must have registered voters equal to or more than 1 percent of the number of votes cast in the previous gubernatorial election (2002) or have had a candidate receive 2 percent of the votes cast in that election. The number of voters registered with the Peace and Freedom Party as of Jan. 3 fell below the 77,389 needed, and the party fielded no candidates in 2002.

Six parties remain to nominate candidates in the June 6 primary: Democratic, Republican, American Independent, Green, Libertarian and Natural Law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WELL IT LOOKS LIKE SOME ONE<br />
AT THE SACRAMENTO BEE<br />
LOOKS IN ON BALLOT ACCESS NEWS<br />
ON A REGULAR BASIS&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>x &#8211; close Recent Stories By Dan Smith</p>
<p>Party falls off ballot<br />
By Dan Smith &#8212; Bee Capitol Bureau<br />
Published 2:15 am PST Wednesday, February 1, 2006<br />
Story appeared on Page A5 of The Bee<br />
The Peace and Freedom Party has failed to qualify as an official party in California for the June 6 election, Secretary of State Bruce McPherson announced Tuesday.</p>
<p>To maintain qualified status, a party must have registered voters equal to or more than 1 percent of the number of votes cast in the previous gubernatorial election (2002) or have had a candidate receive 2 percent of the votes cast in that election. The number of voters registered with the Peace and Freedom Party as of Jan. 3 fell below the 77,389 needed, and the party fielded no candidates in 2002.</p>
<p>Six parties remain to nominate candidates in the June 6 primary: Democratic, Republican, American Independent, Green, Libertarian and Natural Law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

