|
| |
|
2008
PETITIONING FOR PRESIDENT
(updated
September 6, 2008)
|
|
TOTAL
STATES ON THE BALLOT
|
|
Libertarian
Party
|
Green
Party
|
Constitution
Party
|
Nader
(Indep.)
|
|
42
|
31
|
33
|
39
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
August 30th, 2006
On August 30, a U.S. District Court ruled that Michigan’s anti-affirmative action initiative should remain on the ballot. Operation King’s Dream v Connerly, 06-12773. Plaintiffs charged it should be removed from the ballot because some circulators told the potential signers that the initiative would save affirmative action. Judge Arthur Tarnow, a Clinton appointee, accepted this evidence, but ruled that the initiative still would have had enough valid signatures even without the misrepresentation. He also noted that nothing in state law addresses statements made by circulators to potential signers. He said the Voting Rights Act does not apply, because the misstatements were made to voters of all racial and ethnic groups, not just to African-American voters. The case is being appealed to the 6th circuit.
August 30th, 2006
On August 30, the 4th circuit issued on opinion in Miller v Brown, telling the U.S. District Court to decide the case. The issue is whether the Virginia Republican Party can enforce a bylaw (in effect, for now, only in one state senate district), that no one can vote in the Republican primary if they have voted in the last 5 years in a Democratic primary, unless that voter signs a statement of support for the Republican Party.
The US District Court had ducked the issue, saying since the bylaw won’t have any practical effect until 2007, the case is not ripe. Today, the 4th circuit told the US District Court that the case is ripe, and that the US District Court should decide the issue. Miller v Brown, 05-2254. The decision was written by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin, a Clinton appointee.
August 30th, 2006
Charlie Morrison is trying to be placed on the Ohio ballot for U.S. House, 15th district, as an independent. His petition was approved, but he was still rejected because he had voted in this year’s Republican primary. Ohio law is very vague about whether voting in a major party primary disqualifies one as running as an independent (for example, the Green Party’s candidate for Governor this year, who qualified as an independent, also voted in a major party primary this year, and he was not disqualified). Ohio does not have registration by party.
Morrison’s lawsuit in federal court to get on the ballot had been scheduled for an oral argument on August 30. However, both sides agreed to let the judge decide, based on the briefs; the hearing itself was cancelled and a decision will be out next week.
August 29th, 2006
The 6th circuit will probably hear Stewart v Blackwell on December 6. This is not a ballot access case. But it is very important for the future of all election law constitutional litigation, for the entire nation. Stewart v Blackwell deals with whether the 14th amendment requires that all voters in the state have an equal opportunity to have their vote count. Specifically, can the state use voting equipment with a good rate of preventing voter error in some counties, and worse voting equipment in other counties? The issue all hinges on whether the US Supreme Court meant what it said in Bush v Gore, that each voter must be treated equally. The 6th circuit already ruled 2-1 that Bush v Gore meant what it said, and therefore Ohio could not use punchcard systems in some counties. But the state persuaded the 6th circuit to grant a rehearing before all the 6th circuit full-time judges, and that will probably be December 6. All the briefs are in.
August 29th, 2006
Colorado’s 5th U.S. House district (Colorado Springs) has been represented by Congressman Joel Hefley for 20 years. Earlier this year, Hefley announced his retirement. However, Hefley is so distressed with the man who won the Republican primary to replace him, that Hefley was thinking of running for re-election after all, as a write-in candidate. The Republican candidate is State Senator Doug Lamborn. However, at 11:45 am (Colorado time) on August 29, Congressman Hefley said he would not be a write-in candidate after all.
August 28th, 2006
Both the Green and Working Families Parties will have statewide candidates on the Massachusetts ballot this year.
August 28th, 2006
Next year, almost every state legislature will be meeting. It is very common for state legislators to decide which bills they will introduce, during the last few months of even-numbered years. If you live in a state with faulty election laws, and you hope to persuade your state legislature to improve them, now is the time to ask legislators to sponsor such bills. Groups are already working on this project (for ballot access improvements) in California, Georgia, Oregon, Pennsylvania, and perhaps other states.
August 28th, 2006
On August 28, U.S. District Court Judge Patricia Seitz, a Clinton appointee in the southern district (Miami), enjoined the state from enforcing a 2005 law that imposes very large fines on individuals and groups that register voters, if those individuals or groups don’t turn in the registration forms within 10 days after they are filled out. League of Women Voters v Cobb, 06-21265. Thanks to Rick Hasen for this news.
August 28th, 2006
On August 28, Carl Romanelli filed an appeal of his ballot access lawsuit in the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. Romanelli v Caroselli. It argues that the correct number of signatures needed for statewide minor party and independent petitions this year is 15,494, not 67,070. This lawsuit is the only remaining hope for any statewide minor party or independent candidate to be on the Pennsylvania ballot this year, since the rehearing to the 3rd circuit on the constitutional issue, even if granted, would not be heard in time for the election. The challenge proceedings to the Green Party petition are not complete, but since the party turned in 94,000 signatures, and so far 60% of them are invalid, clearly the party won’t be able to show that it has 67,070 valid.
August 28th, 2006
On August 28, a former Republican candidate for Congress filed an objection to the New York Libertarian Party statewide petition. In the thirty years that the Libertarian Party has been getting on the statewide ballot in New York, this is the second time its petitions have been challenged (the other time was 1994, when the party initially nominated Howard Stern for Governor, later replaced by Bob Schulz). So far, there are no challenges this year to the other statewide petitions (filed by the Green, Socialist Workers, and Socialist Equality Parties).
|
|
|
Paper
Issues:
Blog Archives
Syndication

Subscribe to Ballot Access
News via PayPal. Subscriptions are $15 for 12 issues a year ($20 foreign). Additional
donations are welcome.
New
Feature:
Search Ballot Access News
|
|
|
Access to
this site is free. Your donations support this site and the
activities of Richard Winger in lobbying for free and open elections.
To
subscribe via mail, click here and
print out the form to mail. Welcome
to the OFFICIAL online home of Ballot Access News,
a non-partisan newsletter reporting on the trials and tribulations
of folks trying to put candidates on the ballot in the United
States of America. There are many surprisingly restrictive
ballot access laws in this country, which the average voter
has no knowledge or conception of; part of our purpose here
(besides reporting on progress made) is to report on these
restrictive ballot access laws so that more people are aware
of them. I hope you find these materials interesting and exciting;
if you do, you can support the newsletter by subscribing!
Ballot
Access News is edited and published by Richard Winger,
the nation's leading expert on ballot access legal issues.
|
|
Issues
available: |
|
2008:
|
2007:
|
|
2006:
|
2005:
|
|
2004:
|
2003:
|
2002:
- December
2002 Issue
(V:18 N:8)
- November
2002 Issue
(V:18 N:7)
- October
1, 2002 Issue (V:18 N:6)
- September
1, 2002 Issue
(V:18 N:5)
- August
1, 2002 issue (V:18 N:4)
- July
1, 2002 issue (V:18 N:3)
- June
1, 2002 issue (V:18 N:2)
- May
1, 2002 issue (V:18 N:1)
- April
1, 2002 issue (V:17 N:13)
- March
1, 2002 issue (V:17 N:12)
- February
1, 2002 issue (V:17 N:11)
- January
1, 2002 issue (V:17 N:10)
|
2001:
- December
1, 2001 issue (V:17 N:9)
- November
1, 2001 issue (V:17 N:8)
- October
1, 2001 issue (V:17 N:7)
- September
1, 2001 issue (V:17 N:6)
- August
1, 2001 issue (V:17 N:5)
- July
1, 2001 issue (V:17 N:4)
- June
1, 2001 issue (V:17 N:3)
- May
1, 2001 issue (V:17 N:2)
- April
1, 2001 issue (V:17 N:1)
- March
1, 2001 issue (V:16 N:12)
- February
1, 2001 issue (V:16 N:11)
- January
1, 2001 issue (V:16 N:10)
|
2000:
- December
5, 2000 issue (V:16 N:9)
- November
16, 2000 issue (V:16 N:8)
- October
1, 2000 issue (V:16 N:7)
- September
1, 2000 issue (V:16 N:6)
- August
1, 2000 issue (V:16 N:5)
- July
1, 2000 issue (V:16 N:4)
- June
1, 2000 issue (V:16 N:3)
- May
1, 2000 issue (V:16 N:2)
- April
1, 2000 issue (V:16 N:1)
- March
1, 2000 issue (V:15 N:12)
- February
1, 2000 issue (V:15 N:11)
- January
1, 2000 issue (V:15 N:10)
|
1999:
- December
1, 1999 issue (V:15 N:9)
- November
1, 1999 issue (V:15 N:8)
- October
1, 1999 issue (V:15 N:7)
- September
1, 1999 issue (V:15 N:6)
- August
3, 1999 issue (V:15 N:5)
- July
3, 1999 issue (V:15 N:4)
- June
1, 1999 issue (V:15 N:3)
- May
3, 1999 issue (V:15 N:2)
- April
3, 1999 issue (V:15 N:1)
- March
6, 1999 issue (V:14 N:12)
- February
6, 1999 issue (V:14 N:11)
- January
6, 1999 issue (V:14 N:10)
|
1998:
- December
8, 1998 issue (V:14 N:9)
- November
8, 1998 issue (V:14 N:8)
- October
4, 1998 issue (V:14 N:7)
- September
4, 1998 issue (V:14 N:6)
- August
3, 1998 issue (V:14 N:5)
- July
3, 1998 issue (V:14 N:4)
- June
3, 1998 issue (V:14 N:3)
- May
7, 1998 issue (V:14 N:2)
- April
5, 1998 issue (V:14 N:1)
- March
8, 1998 issue (V:13 N:12)
- February
8, 1998 issue (V:13 N:11)
- January
5, 1998 issue (V:13 N:10)
|
1997:
- December
5, 1997 issue (V:13 N:9)
- November
1, 1997 issue (V:13 N:8)
- October
6, 1997 issue (V:13 N:7)
- September
6, 1997 issue (V:13 N:6)
- August
4, 1997 issue (V:13 N:5)
- July
2, 1997 issue (V:13 N:4)
BAN.
changed to a 12 issue per year schedule.
- June
2, 1997 issue (V:13 N:3)
- May
5, 1997 issue (V:13 N:2)
- April
7, 1997 issue (V:13 N:1)
- March
10, 1997 issue (V:12 N:13)
- February
10, 1997 issue (V:12 N:12)
- January
12, 1997 issue (V:12 N:11)
|
1996:
- December
12, 1996 issue (V:12 N:10)
- November
12, 1996 issue (V:12 N:9)
- October
12, 1996 issue (V:12 N:8)
- September
9, 1996 issue (V:12 N:7)
- August
12, 1996 issue (V:12 N:6)
- July
20, 1996 issue (V:12 N:5)
- June
26, 1996 issue (V:12 N:4)
- May
28, 1996 issue (V:12 N:3)
- May
3, 1996 issue (V:12 N:2)
- April
3, 1996 issue (V:12 N:1)
- March
6, 1996 issue (V:11 N:13)
- February
7, 1996 issue (V:11 N:12)
- January
14, 1996 issue (V:11 N:11)
|
1995:
|
1994:
|
1993:
- 1993 Issues
not yet available online
|
|
|
Additional
articles/essays:
- Politics,
Soviet-style by S. Philip Gordon, regarding recent ballot
access issues in Georgia the US state, not the Russian
territority!
Extra
Features:
Other
information:
- Here's how to subscribe
to Ballot Access News!
- Here's information
on Presidential Ballot Access as well as the
vote totals of recent Presidential elections.
- Here are some other
sites which may also be of interest:
Project
Vote-Smart
-
Project Vote
Smart is a citizens' organization dedicated to serving all Americans
with accurate and unbiased information for electoral decision-making.
It was inaugerated in 1992 by former US Presidents Jimmy Carter,
Gerald Ford, and other leaders. Its webpage offers information
about all ballot-listed candidates for all federal and state office.
[Added:040729]
- The
ACE Project
- An interesting
site concerning itself with the "Administration and Cost of Elections",
including issues of fairness and regulatory approaches in various
countries. They seem to be almost blind to the ways that third parties
in the USA are harmed by campaign finance rules crafted for the
problems characteristic of the larger parties, or the ways that
third parties would be disenfranchised by various proposed rules,
but this is nevertheless a useful resource, particularly for the
international comparisons it makes.
[Added:001206]
- "Unofficial"
B.A.N. Page
-
At first,
it looks like there's not much here. But then you follow the "Charts"
link, and click on one of the listed candidates, and you'll get
some truly wonderful nationwide maps of voting patterns.
[Checked:991014]
- ThirdPartyNews.net
-
A site that
covers news about minor parties.
[Checked:060414]
- Third
Party Central
-
Collects lots
of good information and links relating to various third parties
into one convenient location. Nice set of writings on why one
should vote third-party.
[Checked:991014]
- Atlas
of U.S. Presidential Elections
-
A surprisingly
complete listing of votes cast in Presidential elections, including
numerous third-party candidates and nice maps of vote distribution
by state and (on the individual state pages) by county.
[New-URL:010309]
- D.C.'s
Political Report
-
Very good
presentation of candidate and party information, including virtually
every known third-party group in the USA. Election results, candidate
information, etc.
[Updated:991214]
- Initiative
For Texas
-
A group trying
to establish the right to Initiative and Referendum in Texas.
Their work has intriguing parallels and overlaps with ballot access
work. Every page at the site seems to have some music on it, which
can get annoying after awhile, but otherwise it's an interesting
site.
[Checked:991014]
- Center
for Voting and Democracy
-
Folks concerned
with alternative voting systems, and related issues, from a moderately
leftist perspective. Useful articles describing how better systems
of voting and electing actually work.
[Added:000823]
The newsletter
is published by and copyright by Richard
Winger. |
| |
|
|