<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Mexico Ballot Access Case Loses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2006/09/20/new-mexico-ballot-access-case-loses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2006/09/20/new-mexico-ballot-access-case-loses/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:09:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=8595</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Knight</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2006/09/20/new-mexico-ballot-access-case-loses/comment-page-1/#comment-16678</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Knight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 17:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2006/09/20/new-mexico-ballot-access-case-loses/#comment-16678</guid>
		<description>I would have expected as much in the NM state courts but had hoped for more from the feds. Foolish me! I hope the ACLU will carry an appeal for us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have expected as much in the NM state courts but had hoped for more from the feds. Foolish me! I hope the ACLU will carry an appeal for us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joeyD</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2006/09/20/new-mexico-ballot-access-case-loses/comment-page-1/#comment-16596</link>
		<dc:creator>joeyD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 18:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2006/09/20/new-mexico-ballot-access-case-loses/#comment-16596</guid>
		<description>Sounds like Judge Vazquez was not interested in the case and she didn&#039;t spend much time researching it. From my point of view it sounds like she missed the boat -- another example of sloppy judicial work. But do other courts view ignoring Supreme Court precedent as sloppy work?  Do these points make a strong case before an Appeals court?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like Judge Vazquez was not interested in the case and she didn&#8217;t spend much time researching it. From my point of view it sounds like she missed the boat &#8212; another example of sloppy judicial work. But do other courts view ignoring Supreme Court precedent as sloppy work?  Do these points make a strong case before an Appeals court?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

