<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lawsuit Filed Against Oregon Ballot Access Restriction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2006/10/03/lawsuit-filed-against-oregon-ballot-access-restriction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2006/10/03/lawsuit-filed-against-oregon-ballot-access-restriction/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:30:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3044</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Winger</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2006/10/03/lawsuit-filed-against-oregon-ballot-access-restriction/comment-page-1/#comment-17552</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Winger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 11:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2006/10/03/lawsuit-filed-against-oregon-ballot-access-restriction/#comment-17552</guid>
		<description>US Constitutional grounds for overturning the Oregon restriction are:  (1) states cannot make ballot access harder for a statewide independent than an entire new party, see DeLaney v Bartlett; (2) Oregon violates the principle that the first nominating act counts and the 2nd one doesn&#039;t.  See Lily v Mahoney, a New York Supreme Court ruling from 1977 or 1978.  These two points differentiate Oregon&#039;s HB 2614 restriction from Texas law upheld in 1974 by the US Supreme Court.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>US Constitutional grounds for overturning the Oregon restriction are:  (1) states cannot make ballot access harder for a statewide independent than an entire new party, see DeLaney v Bartlett; (2) Oregon violates the principle that the first nominating act counts and the 2nd one doesn&#8217;t.  See Lily v Mahoney, a New York Supreme Court ruling from 1977 or 1978.  These two points differentiate Oregon&#8217;s HB 2614 restriction from Texas law upheld in 1974 by the US Supreme Court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Wasson</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2006/10/03/lawsuit-filed-against-oregon-ballot-access-restriction/comment-page-1/#comment-17513</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Wasson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 17:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2006/10/03/lawsuit-filed-against-oregon-ballot-access-restriction/#comment-17513</guid>
		<description>James -

    Sorry, I pushed the wrong button.  I&#039;m the person who filed the Oregon suit, and, yes the ruling is from Texas.

    The difference between Oregon and Texas, though, is that Oregonians have expressly had this right in statute since 1904.

Greg Wasson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James -</p>
<p>    Sorry, I pushed the wrong button.  I&#8217;m the person who filed the Oregon suit, and, yes the ruling is from Texas.</p>
<p>    The difference between Oregon and Texas, though, is that Oregonians have expressly had this right in statute since 1904.</p>
<p>Greg Wasson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Wasson</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2006/10/03/lawsuit-filed-against-oregon-ballot-access-restriction/comment-page-1/#comment-17512</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Wasson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 17:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2006/10/03/lawsuit-filed-against-oregon-ballot-access-restriction/#comment-17512</guid>
		<description>James -</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James -</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2006/10/03/lawsuit-filed-against-oregon-ballot-access-restriction/comment-page-1/#comment-17483</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 05:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2006/10/03/lawsuit-filed-against-oregon-ballot-access-restriction/#comment-17483</guid>
		<description>Is the 1974 ruling the one from Texas?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the 1974 ruling the one from Texas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

