<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reform Party News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2006/10/07/reform-party-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2006/10/07/reform-party-news/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:09:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1451</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Jacobs</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2006/10/07/reform-party-news/comment-page-1/#comment-18422</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Jacobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 20:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2006/10/07/reform-party-news/#comment-18422</guid>
		<description>To Eric Dondero. What is a shame is that more states don&#039;t have fusion so that a candidate can get the approval of both parties.

My understanding of the Reform party is that they want to make the current government more effecient. While the is a worthy goal to same money and create a smaller government, it is not the Libertarian Position.

Maybe the Reform Party should be more like the Libertarian Party. Maybe the Greens and Libertarians should get together. How about the Constitution Party and the Libertarians?

We all have different opinions. It is easier for a candiate to compromise than a party since that candidate may really beleive in an in between positions. Party compromising requires long negotiations between two large groups represented by two boards. Much harder. Fusion is the best way of handling this.

If enough people vote for a Reform-Libertarian, then both parties will notice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Eric Dondero. What is a shame is that more states don&#8217;t have fusion so that a candidate can get the approval of both parties.</p>
<p>My understanding of the Reform party is that they want to make the current government more effecient. While the is a worthy goal to same money and create a smaller government, it is not the Libertarian Position.</p>
<p>Maybe the Reform Party should be more like the Libertarian Party. Maybe the Greens and Libertarians should get together. How about the Constitution Party and the Libertarians?</p>
<p>We all have different opinions. It is easier for a candiate to compromise than a party since that candidate may really beleive in an in between positions. Party compromising requires long negotiations between two large groups represented by two boards. Much harder. Fusion is the best way of handling this.</p>
<p>If enough people vote for a Reform-Libertarian, then both parties will notice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald Raymond Lake</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2006/10/07/reform-party-news/comment-page-1/#comment-17787</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald Raymond Lake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2006 19:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2006/10/07/reform-party-news/#comment-17787</guid>
		<description>While I agree with EVERY THING that Eric Dondero R. mentions above, I find the arrogant attitude OF A TEXAS REPUBLICAN whom counts fake reformers like GOP Govenator Ahnold Schwartz En Faker as &quot;Mainstream Libertarian&quot; and whom constantly ignores the pointed questions on the so called reform movement, Libertarians, and the GOP/ Neocons -----just utterly illogical! 

He lives in his own little lonely world, and constantly thinks of his own true love, HIMSELF.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree with EVERY THING that Eric Dondero R. mentions above, I find the arrogant attitude OF A TEXAS REPUBLICAN whom counts fake reformers like GOP Govenator Ahnold Schwartz En Faker as &#8220;Mainstream Libertarian&#8221; and whom constantly ignores the pointed questions on the so called reform movement, Libertarians, and the GOP/ Neocons &#8212;&#8211;just utterly illogical! </p>
<p>He lives in his own little lonely world, and constantly thinks of his own true love, HIMSELF&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald Raymond Lake</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2006/10/07/reform-party-news/comment-page-1/#comment-17751</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald Raymond Lake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2006 02:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2006/10/07/reform-party-news/#comment-17751</guid>
		<description>Reform the Reform Party! Come visit Chula Vista (Court) on Columbus Day (traditional) as I continue my persuit of justice and funds from BOTH of California&#039;s last two state chairs [Valli Sharpe-Geisler and John Blare]!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reform the Reform Party! Come visit Chula Vista (Court) on Columbus Day (traditional) as I continue my persuit of justice and funds from BOTH of California&#8217;s last two state chairs [Valli Sharpe-Geisler and John Blare]!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

