Comments on: Utah Makes Headway in Drawing a New District

By: pviyspdmuz

pviyspdmuz — Wed, 27 Jun 2007 17:51:06 +0000

Thanks for this site! guiop.info

By: xsztximkah

xsztximkah — Thu, 21 Jun 2007 05:07:48 +0000

Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! rzqujtuvfnmrn

By: Eric Garris

Eric Garris — Sat, 02 Dec 2006 15:18:10 +0000

Residents of Washington, DC, were permitted to vote in Maryland US House elections before 1800. So the founding fathers were not opposed to letting D.C. residents have voting representation in the US House.

By: matt

matt — Fri, 01 Dec 2006 20:27:46 +0000

So, people in 49 states have their collective legislative “voice” slightly diluted, but it’s ok because both Democrats and Republicans get to do it evenly? We’re in more trouble than I thought if garbage like this can get voted through.

By: Taylor Bowles

Taylor Bowles — Fri, 01 Dec 2006 13:03:34 +0000

If it isn’t broke, why fix it?

By: NewFederalist

NewFederalist — Fri, 01 Dec 2006 12:25:05 +0000

I agree with Charles Broy. Just when will DC (or perhaps New Columbia?) be “awarded” their two “rightful” Senate seats and hold elections for governor and legislature in addition to mayor and council? That is just what they need… MORE government! This solves EVERYTHING!

By: Charles Broy

Charles Broy — Fri, 01 Dec 2006 06:41:31 +0000

Like many other bills passed it is Unconstitutional to give Washington D.C a vote.the founding fathers Excluded Washington.D.C. for a very good reason.

By: Phil

Phil — Fri, 01 Dec 2006 05:57:28 +0000

*increase

By: Phil

Phil — Fri, 01 Dec 2006 05:56:36 +0000

You say “temporarily expand the size of the U.S. House from 435 seats to 437″, but I’m pretty sure the bill states that it’s a permanent increse.