<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vermont Secretary of State Will Propose IRV for One or Two Offices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/01/22/vermont-secretary-of-state-will-propose-irv-for-one-or-two-offices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/01/22/vermont-secretary-of-state-will-propose-irv-for-one-or-two-offices/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 10:13:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=9115</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry James</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/01/22/vermont-secretary-of-state-will-propose-irv-for-one-or-two-offices/comment-page-1/#comment-670458</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 22:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/01/22/vermont-secretary-of-state-will-propose-irv-for-one-or-two-offices/#comment-670458</guid>
		<description>Of course, what a great site and informative posts...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, what a great site and informative posts&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clay Shentrup</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/01/22/vermont-secretary-of-state-will-propose-irv-for-one-or-two-offices/comment-page-1/#comment-41088</link>
		<dc:creator>Clay Shentrup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 07:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/01/22/vermont-secretary-of-state-will-propose-irv-for-one-or-two-offices/#comment-41088</guid>
		<description>She has the best of intentions, but IRV is not the voting system we should be supporting.  Range Voting is cheaper, simpler, monotonic, FBLE and IIA compliant, and produces substiantlly higher social utility efficiency than Range Voting, not to mention it will end two-party duopoly, whereas IRV leads to two-party domination, as we have seen in Australia, Ireland, Fiji, and Malta.

We need Range Voting.

http://reformthelp.org/issues/voting/range.php

Clay Shentrup
Seattle, WA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She has the best of intentions, but IRV is not the voting system we should be supporting.  Range Voting is cheaper, simpler, monotonic, FBLE and IIA compliant, and produces substiantlly higher social utility efficiency than Range Voting, not to mention it will end two-party duopoly, whereas IRV leads to two-party domination, as we have seen in Australia, Ireland, Fiji, and Malta.</p>
<p>We need Range Voting.</p>
<p><a href="http://reformthelp.org/issues/voting/range.php" rel="nofollow">http://reformthelp.org/issues/voting/range.php</a></p>
<p>Clay Shentrup<br />
Seattle, WA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esther Munroe Swift</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/01/22/vermont-secretary-of-state-will-propose-irv-for-one-or-two-offices/comment-page-1/#comment-40997</link>
		<dc:creator>Esther Munroe Swift</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 23:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/01/22/vermont-secretary-of-state-will-propose-irv-for-one-or-two-offices/#comment-40997</guid>
		<description>I am very much in agreement with the Secretary of State&#039;s proposal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am very much in agreement with the Secretary of State&#8217;s proposal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

