<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reform Party Petition for Rehearing Denied in FEC Case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/05/10/reform-party-petition-for-rehearing-denied-in-fec-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/05/10/reform-party-petition-for-rehearing-denied-in-fec-case/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:30:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=6276</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Garner</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/05/10/reform-party-petition-for-rehearing-denied-in-fec-case/comment-page-1/#comment-61039</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Garner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 03:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/05/10/reform-party-petition-for-rehearing-denied-in-fec-case/#comment-61039</guid>
		<description>This is very interesting. I wonder how the &quot;group&quot; that is calling itself the &quot;Reform Party&quot; will continue to spend thounsands of dollars per month suing real party leaders in their frivilious case in Florida. It would appear to me to continue to do so would be contempt of court.  Someone should tell the court.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very interesting. I wonder how the &#8220;group&#8221; that is calling itself the &#8220;Reform Party&#8221; will continue to spend thounsands of dollars per month suing real party leaders in their frivilious case in Florida. It would appear to me to continue to do so would be contempt of court.  Someone should tell the court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Morrison</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/05/10/reform-party-petition-for-rehearing-denied-in-fec-case/comment-page-1/#comment-60957</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Morrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 18:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/05/10/reform-party-petition-for-rehearing-denied-in-fec-case/#comment-60957</guid>
		<description>And I would think any honorable party that opposes as much federal activity as the CP CLAIMS to oppose would have refused to take taxpayer money in the first place.
Nice example of chickens coming home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I would think any honorable party that opposes as much federal activity as the CP CLAIMS to oppose would have refused to take taxpayer money in the first place.<br />
Nice example of chickens coming home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle B</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/05/10/reform-party-petition-for-rehearing-denied-in-fec-case/comment-page-1/#comment-60757</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 17:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/05/10/reform-party-petition-for-rehearing-denied-in-fec-case/#comment-60757</guid>
		<description>I would think this ruling killed any small chance the Reform Party had of ever rebuilding and becoming a national third party again</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would think this ruling killed any small chance the Reform Party had of ever rebuilding and becoming a national third party again</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

