<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hillary Clinton Gives a Somewhat Favorable Response to Expanded General Election Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/06/10/hillary-clinton-gives-a-somewhat-favorable-response-to-expanded-general-election-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/06/10/hillary-clinton-gives-a-somewhat-favorable-response-to-expanded-general-election-debate/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 13:28:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=9088</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles from CA</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/06/10/hillary-clinton-gives-a-somewhat-favorable-response-to-expanded-general-election-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-67380</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles from CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/06/10/hillary-clinton-gives-a-somewhat-favorable-response-to-expanded-general-election-debate/#comment-67380</guid>
		<description>Well it is encouraging that Mr. Reinsch was able to ask
&quot;The question&quot; of one of the first tier candidates. Now
that it was asked I expect that very soon all of the
candidates will have an answer for it (just in case).
It sure is un-classy of her to hedge so badly since her
husband supported the inclusion of Ross Perot in 1992.
When she says that she would be reluctant about it must
be someone she thinks could hurt her like Nader was
suppossed to have done to Gore in 2000.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it is encouraging that Mr. Reinsch was able to ask<br />
&#8220;The question&#8221; of one of the first tier candidates. Now<br />
that it was asked I expect that very soon all of the<br />
candidates will have an answer for it (just in case).<br />
It sure is un-classy of her to hedge so badly since her<br />
husband supported the inclusion of Ross Perot in 1992.<br />
When she says that she would be reluctant about it must<br />
be someone she thinks could hurt her like Nader was<br />
suppossed to have done to Gore in 2000.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

