Comments on: Pennsylvania Reform Party Affiliates with new national Independence Party http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/10/23/pennsylvania-reform-party-affiliates-with-new-national-independence-party/ Sun, 12 Feb 2012 10:38:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=5051 By: Phil Sawyer http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/10/23/pennsylvania-reform-party-affiliates-with-new-national-independence-party/comment-page-1/#comment-146206 Phil Sawyer Sat, 27 Oct 2007 21:26:13 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/10/23/pennsylvania-reform-party-affiliates-with-new-national-independence-party/#comment-146206 Please allow me to restate a message that I wrote on a previous page of this website: Phil Sawyer Says: October 22nd, 2007 at 5:44 pm Here is another thought on this subject; one that might help to solve the California problem for the Independence Party (and possibly Unity08 also): The Independence Party (and possibly Unity08) should help the Reform Party get back on the ballot in California. After all, the Honorable Ross Perot and his people, in 1995, were at first going to name the new party in California (and other states, etc.) the Independence Party. Shortly after that announcement, it was made known that plans were changed and the new party would be called the Reform Party. This was due to the fact that utilizing the name, Independence Party, would conflict with the mames of other parties in certain states (i.e., California, where we have the American Independent Party). Instead of starting from scratch, it seems logical to me that the Reform Party of California, the new, national Independence Party, and Unity08 should all help each other! Please allow me to restate a message that I wrote on a previous page of this website:

Phil Sawyer Says:
October 22nd, 2007 at 5:44 pm
Here is another thought on this subject; one that might help to solve the California problem for the Independence Party (and possibly Unity08 also):

The Independence Party (and possibly Unity08) should help the Reform Party get back on the ballot in California. After all, the Honorable Ross Perot and his people, in 1995, were at first going to name the new party in California (and other states, etc.) the Independence Party. Shortly after that announcement, it was made known that plans were changed and the new party would be called the Reform Party. This was due to the fact that utilizing the name, Independence Party, would conflict with the mames of other parties in certain states (i.e., California, where we have the American Independent Party).

Instead of starting from scratch, it seems logical to me that the Reform Party of California, the new, national Independence Party, and Unity08 should all help each other!

]]> By: Glenn Brown http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/10/23/pennsylvania-reform-party-affiliates-with-new-national-independence-party/comment-page-1/#comment-143465 Glenn Brown Wed, 24 Oct 2007 01:38:03 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/10/23/pennsylvania-reform-party-affiliates-with-new-national-independence-party/#comment-143465 Is the Reform Party ballot qualified in Pennsylvania ?? I quess the National Independence Party is the one out of New York ? Is the Reform Party ballot qualified in Pennsylvania ?? I quess the National Independence Party is the one out of New York ?

]]> By: Don ald R. Lake http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/10/23/pennsylvania-reform-party-affiliates-with-new-national-independence-party/comment-page-1/#comment-143223 Don ald R. Lake Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:56:49 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/10/23/pennsylvania-reform-party-affiliates-with-new-national-independence-party/#comment-143223 We hope the IP is critical and careful of former and present Reformers via the malfunctional 'leaders' whom have beaten the stuffings out of the reformist movement! We hope the IP is critical and careful of former and present Reformers via the malfunctional ‘leaders’ whom have beaten the stuffings out of the reformist movement!

]]>