<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Clean Elections&#8221; New Jersey Libertarian Fails to Get Injunctive Relief</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/10/30/clean-elections-new-jersey-libertarian-fails-to-get-injunctive-relief/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/10/30/clean-elections-new-jersey-libertarian-fails-to-get-injunctive-relief/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 10:38:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=9186</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Jacobs</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/10/30/clean-elections-new-jersey-libertarian-fails-to-get-injunctive-relief/comment-page-1/#comment-149737</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Jacobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/10/30/clean-elections-new-jersey-libertarian-fails-to-get-injunctive-relief/#comment-149737</guid>
		<description>He may not know after becoming eligble that â€œClean Elections Candidateâ€ would not have been printed by his name. This is the first year the law went into effect. He may have only found out after the sample ballots were mailed. The judge still could have ruled for future elections so I don&#039;t believe the issue should be moot.

Of course he may have been pre-occupied with trying to run for office. It is unfortunate that third party candidates have to spend what little resources they have suing judges instead of running for office. but if you are reading this, you already know this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He may not know after becoming eligble that â€œClean Elections Candidateâ€ would not have been printed by his name. This is the first year the law went into effect. He may have only found out after the sample ballots were mailed. The judge still could have ruled for future elections so I don&#8217;t believe the issue should be moot.</p>
<p>Of course he may have been pre-occupied with trying to run for office. It is unfortunate that third party candidates have to spend what little resources they have suing judges instead of running for office. but if you are reading this, you already know this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timm Knibbs</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/10/30/clean-elections-new-jersey-libertarian-fails-to-get-injunctive-relief/comment-page-1/#comment-149734</link>
		<dc:creator>Timm Knibbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/10/30/clean-elections-new-jersey-libertarian-fails-to-get-injunctive-relief/#comment-149734</guid>
		<description>When did he become qualified for the funds. He should have filed soon after becoming eligible. Although his point is still valid and since most cases end up being decided after the election the court should still here the case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When did he become qualified for the funds. He should have filed soon after becoming eligible. Although his point is still valid and since most cases end up being decided after the election the court should still here the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ETJB</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/10/30/clean-elections-new-jersey-libertarian-fails-to-get-injunctive-relief/comment-page-1/#comment-149680</link>
		<dc:creator>ETJB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/10/30/clean-elections-new-jersey-libertarian-fails-to-get-injunctive-relief/#comment-149680</guid>
		<description>Some thoughts;

If eight different candidates will not confuse voters, then why not just let the eight top parties maintain their ballot access status?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some thoughts;</p>
<p>If eight different candidates will not confuse voters, then why not just let the eight top parties maintain their ballot access status?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Bireta</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/10/30/clean-elections-new-jersey-libertarian-fails-to-get-injunctive-relief/comment-page-1/#comment-149572</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Bireta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/10/30/clean-elections-new-jersey-libertarian-fails-to-get-injunctive-relief/#comment-149572</guid>
		<description>State funded and endorsed candidates? It is not the campaign donations that lead to corruption, the cause of corruption is the massive amount of money collected by the state that is made available for redistribution. If the state had a budget of $1, how much corruption would there be? As our country moves closer to The United Socialist States of America, you&#039;ll only see corruption increase.

I live in New Jersey and have witnessed in the District 14 trial of &quot;Fair and Clean&quot; that it is neither fair nor clean! It&#039;s just another way to promote D&#039;s and R&#039;s which are virtually indistinguishable here and keep independents from running.

For example, News 12 New Jersey excluded Mr. Scheurer from the televised debate. If the qualified candidates have a responsibility of running fair and clean, why didn&#039;t they oppose his exclusion as requested on the youtube video below? I saw him debate in Hamilton and he did very well at connecting with the audience.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9Nyq2WG9RU</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>State funded and endorsed candidates? It is not the campaign donations that lead to corruption, the cause of corruption is the massive amount of money collected by the state that is made available for redistribution. If the state had a budget of $1, how much corruption would there be? As our country moves closer to The United Socialist States of America, you&#8217;ll only see corruption increase.</p>
<p>I live in New Jersey and have witnessed in the District 14 trial of &#8220;Fair and Clean&#8221; that it is neither fair nor clean! It&#8217;s just another way to promote D&#8217;s and R&#8217;s which are virtually indistinguishable here and keep independents from running.</p>
<p>For example, News 12 New Jersey excluded Mr. Scheurer from the televised debate. If the qualified candidates have a responsibility of running fair and clean, why didn&#8217;t they oppose his exclusion as requested on the youtube video below? I saw him debate in Hamilton and he did very well at connecting with the audience.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9Nyq2WG9RU" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9Nyq2WG9RU</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Weller</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/10/30/clean-elections-new-jersey-libertarian-fails-to-get-injunctive-relief/comment-page-1/#comment-149348</link>
		<dc:creator>David Weller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 05:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/10/30/clean-elections-new-jersey-libertarian-fails-to-get-injunctive-relief/#comment-149348</guid>
		<description>Sorry!  That&#039;s www.fairelectionsnow.org.  David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry!  That&#8217;s <a href="http://www.fairelectionsnow.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.fairelectionsnow.org</a>.  David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Weller</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/10/30/clean-elections-new-jersey-libertarian-fails-to-get-injunctive-relief/comment-page-1/#comment-149347</link>
		<dc:creator>David Weller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 05:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/10/30/clean-elections-new-jersey-libertarian-fails-to-get-injunctive-relief/#comment-149347</guid>
		<description>New Jersey is in the beginnings of more clean elections across the country.  Get ready for Clean Elections Week November 12-16, at www.cleanelectionsweek.org.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New Jersey is in the beginnings of more clean elections across the country.  Get ready for Clean Elections Week November 12-16, at <a href="http://www.cleanelectionsweek.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.cleanelectionsweek.org</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Morrison</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/10/30/clean-elections-new-jersey-libertarian-fails-to-get-injunctive-relief/comment-page-1/#comment-148867</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Morrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/10/30/clean-elections-new-jersey-libertarian-fails-to-get-injunctive-relief/#comment-148867</guid>
		<description>&quot;Clean Elections&quot; and &quot;New Jersey&quot; would seem to be mutually exclusive terms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Clean Elections&#8221; and &#8220;New Jersey&#8221; would seem to be mutually exclusive terms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

