<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unity08 Revamps Its Own Web Page</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/10/31/unity08-revamps-its-own-web-page/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/10/31/unity08-revamps-its-own-web-page/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:27:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=8527</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Sawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/10/31/unity08-revamps-its-own-web-page/comment-page-1/#comment-152572</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Sawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 15:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/10/31/unity08-revamps-its-own-web-page/#comment-152572</guid>
		<description>That is Patrick Lucey, Don - not Patrick Lacey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is Patrick Lucey, Don &#8211; not Patrick Lacey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/10/31/unity08-revamps-its-own-web-page/comment-page-1/#comment-150560</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 01:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/10/31/unity08-revamps-its-own-web-page/#comment-150560</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say it&#039;s either A or C. They don&#039;t even have a platform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s either A or C. They don&#8217;t even have a platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don ald R. Lake</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/10/31/unity08-revamps-its-own-web-page/comment-page-1/#comment-150460</link>
		<dc:creator>Don ald R. Lake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 22:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/10/31/unity08-revamps-its-own-web-page/#comment-150460</guid>
		<description>History lessons, Era of Good Feeling in ante bellum USA [1830s and 1840s];  Union Party [GOP Lincoln and Dem Andrew Johnson] 1864; Progressive &#039;Bull Moose Party &#039; [Teddy Roosevelt and California Direct Democracy Governor Hiram W. Johnson] 1912;  National Unity Party [GOP John B. Anderson and Dem Patrick Lacey] 1980;  Perot and Nader and the Era of Discontent.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>History lessons, Era of Good Feeling in ante bellum USA [1830s and 1840s];  Union Party [GOP Lincoln and Dem Andrew Johnson] 1864; Progressive &#8216;Bull Moose Party &#8216; [Teddy Roosevelt and California Direct Democracy Governor Hiram W. Johnson] 1912;  National Unity Party [GOP John B. Anderson and Dem Patrick Lacey] 1980;  Perot and Nader and the Era of Discontent&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/10/31/unity08-revamps-its-own-web-page/comment-page-1/#comment-150450</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 21:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/10/31/unity08-revamps-its-own-web-page/#comment-150450</guid>
		<description>Ballotman, I&#039;ve donated to Unity08. It is in its infancy and whether it takes off or not will be decided when there are actual candidates seeking the nomination. Kinda hard to rally around an unknown Rep/Dem or Dem/Rep ticket. Unity08 has more challenges to overcome than &#039;traditional&#039; third party efforts. 
Andrew, All of the above except maybe C. A) Yes, if you consider anyone other than your candidate as a challenge. Especially the belly-aching Democrats in 2000 about Nader. B) Yes, we are all seeking better ballot access opportunities across American and Unity08 may push the envelope in some areas to better ballot access. C) Has as good a chance as LP, CP, GP, Ind, if not better as they potentially may have a nationally known/recognized candidate(s) from one/both of the two major parties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ballotman, I&#8217;ve donated to Unity08. It is in its infancy and whether it takes off or not will be decided when there are actual candidates seeking the nomination. Kinda hard to rally around an unknown Rep/Dem or Dem/Rep ticket. Unity08 has more challenges to overcome than &#8216;traditional&#8217; third party efforts.<br />
Andrew, All of the above except maybe C. A) Yes, if you consider anyone other than your candidate as a challenge. Especially the belly-aching Democrats in 2000 about Nader. B) Yes, we are all seeking better ballot access opportunities across American and Unity08 may push the envelope in some areas to better ballot access. C) Has as good a chance as LP, CP, GP, Ind, if not better as they potentially may have a nationally known/recognized candidate(s) from one/both of the two major parties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew MacRae</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/10/31/unity08-revamps-its-own-web-page/comment-page-1/#comment-150443</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew MacRae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 21:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/10/31/unity08-revamps-its-own-web-page/#comment-150443</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious what this community thinks about Unity08, potential (A) rival, (B) ally or (3) doesn&#039;t have a chance so don&#039;t bother?

My own opinion is (B)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious what this community thinks about Unity08, potential (A) rival, (B) ally or (3) doesn&#8217;t have a chance so don&#8217;t bother?</p>
<p>My own opinion is (B)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darryl W. Perry</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/10/31/unity08-revamps-its-own-web-page/comment-page-1/#comment-150305</link>
		<dc:creator>Darryl W. Perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 18:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/10/31/unity08-revamps-its-own-web-page/#comment-150305</guid>
		<description>Actually, Ballotman, the LP, CP, Greens, etc, use the Independent Presidential Candidate procedure in Alabama, as you only need 5,000 signatures for an Independent Presidential Candidate, but over 40,000 for a Party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Ballotman, the LP, CP, Greens, etc, use the Independent Presidential Candidate procedure in Alabama, as you only need 5,000 signatures for an Independent Presidential Candidate, but over 40,000 for a Party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/10/31/unity08-revamps-its-own-web-page/comment-page-1/#comment-150257</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/10/31/unity08-revamps-its-own-web-page/#comment-150257</guid>
		<description>Technically, the FEC did not fine the Reform Party.  Instead, it determined that some of the money given to the party for its 2000 national convention was not spent properly, so it wants that money back.  That is not the same as a fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technically, the FEC did not fine the Reform Party.  Instead, it determined that some of the money given to the party for its 2000 national convention was not spent properly, so it wants that money back.  That is not the same as a fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ballotman</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/10/31/unity08-revamps-its-own-web-page/comment-page-1/#comment-150242</link>
		<dc:creator>Ballotman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/10/31/unity08-revamps-its-own-web-page/#comment-150242</guid>
		<description>Yep they still are not playing by the rules that the LP, Greens, CP, IP and others all follow. Your money will be wasted if you donate to them since eventually the FEC will take it all in fines just like what happened to the RP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep they still are not playing by the rules that the LP, Greens, CP, IP and others all follow. Your money will be wasted if you donate to them since eventually the FEC will take it all in fines just like what happened to the RP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WILL</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/10/31/unity08-revamps-its-own-web-page/comment-page-1/#comment-149992</link>
		<dc:creator>WILL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 04:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/10/31/unity08-revamps-its-own-web-page/#comment-149992</guid>
		<description>these people are not going to be able to play the game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>these people are not going to be able to play the game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

