<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Greens and Libertarians Win Partisan Elections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/11/07/green-and-libertarians-win-partisan-elections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/11/07/green-and-libertarians-win-partisan-elections/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:30:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3139</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/11/07/green-and-libertarians-win-partisan-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-168948</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 00:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/11/07/green-and-libertarians-win-partisan-elections/#comment-168948</guid>
		<description>The North Carolina wins are non-partisan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The North Carolina wins are non-partisan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joyce McCloy</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/11/07/green-and-libertarians-win-partisan-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-168734</link>
		<dc:creator>Joyce McCloy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 19:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/11/07/green-and-libertarians-win-partisan-elections/#comment-168734</guid>
		<description>Sorry, one other comment.
North Carolina has really repressive ballot access laws, and this should be corrected.  It is clearly out of line with the rest of the country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, one other comment.<br />
North Carolina has really repressive ballot access laws, and this should be corrected.  It is clearly out of line with the rest of the country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joyce McCloy</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/11/07/green-and-libertarians-win-partisan-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-168729</link>
		<dc:creator>Joyce McCloy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 19:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/11/07/green-and-libertarians-win-partisan-elections/#comment-168729</guid>
		<description>Were any of these wins obtained through IRV? 

Notice how there were no Green Party or Libertarian Party victories due to Instant Runoff Voting in San Francisco?

The only victors in San Francisco were the incumbents. 

Are you sure that the two victories in NC were in partisan elections?  Usually the wins are in non partisan contests in some city council elections.

Perhaps the third parties should capitolize on their successes in winning small offices and build on that to gain more support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Were any of these wins obtained through IRV? </p>
<p>Notice how there were no Green Party or Libertarian Party victories due to Instant Runoff Voting in San Francisco?</p>
<p>The only victors in San Francisco were the incumbents. </p>
<p>Are you sure that the two victories in NC were in partisan elections?  Usually the wins are in non partisan contests in some city council elections.</p>
<p>Perhaps the third parties should capitolize on their successes in winning small offices and build on that to gain more support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Davidson</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/11/07/green-and-libertarians-win-partisan-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-155150</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 20:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/11/07/green-and-libertarians-win-partisan-elections/#comment-155150</guid>
		<description>Four victories in Pennsylvania, four in Michigan, two in NC, one each in Ohio, Indiana, Idaho, Iowa for a total of 14 Libertarian Party victories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Four victories in Pennsylvania, four in Michigan, two in NC, one each in Ohio, Indiana, Idaho, Iowa for a total of 14 Libertarian Party victories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/11/07/green-and-libertarians-win-partisan-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-154989</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 06:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/11/07/green-and-libertarians-win-partisan-elections/#comment-154989</guid>
		<description>Actually, Jean de Smet was not running under a party label. She had run before on the Green line, but this year she formed a coalition with disaffected Democrats, Republicans, and unaffiliated candidates tired of the partisan bickering in town, and they all ran as simple petitioning candidates with no party line. In CT, petitioning candidates are always listed at the bottom of the ballot, so they took &quot;The Bottom Line&quot; as the name of their coalition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Jean de Smet was not running under a party label. She had run before on the Green line, but this year she formed a coalition with disaffected Democrats, Republicans, and unaffiliated candidates tired of the partisan bickering in town, and they all ran as simple petitioning candidates with no party line. In CT, petitioning candidates are always listed at the bottom of the ballot, so they took &#8220;The Bottom Line&#8221; as the name of their coalition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

