<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Mexico Green Party is On Ballot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/11/12/new-mexico-green-party-is-on-ballot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/11/12/new-mexico-green-party-is-on-ballot/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:52:51 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/11/12/new-mexico-green-party-is-on-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-159600</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 02:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/11/12/new-mexico-green-party-is-on-ballot/#comment-159600</guid>
		<description>Wasn&#039;t the Constitution Party part of this ballot case ? If not what happen to CP in NM ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t the Constitution Party part of this ballot case ? If not what happen to CP in NM ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michal</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/11/12/new-mexico-green-party-is-on-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-158520</link>
		<dc:creator>Michal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 21:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/11/12/new-mexico-green-party-is-on-ballot/#comment-158520</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m very puzzled by the lack of a detailed explanation for their decision and worried that it sets the decision up for a challenge by a particular party that wouldn&#039;t wish to see Green competition on the ballot.  Insofar as it took the Secretary of State an inordinate amount of time to come to this decision, AND that it was subsequently routed to the Attorney General&#039;s office for a further questionable delay, I can only conclude that there was no other logical explanation than they were awaiting Udall&#039;s decision to run for Senate!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m very puzzled by the lack of a detailed explanation for their decision and worried that it sets the decision up for a challenge by a particular party that wouldn&#8217;t wish to see Green competition on the ballot.  Insofar as it took the Secretary of State an inordinate amount of time to come to this decision, AND that it was subsequently routed to the Attorney General&#8217;s office for a further questionable delay, I can only conclude that there was no other logical explanation than they were awaiting Udall&#8217;s decision to run for Senate!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Yager</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/11/12/new-mexico-green-party-is-on-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-158034</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Yager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 23:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/11/12/new-mexico-green-party-is-on-ballot/#comment-158034</guid>
		<description>Good news for the Greens!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good news for the Greens!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
