<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alabama Ballot Access Case Soon to be Before U.S. Supreme Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/11/20/alabama-ballot-access-case-soon-to-be-before-us-supreme-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/11/20/alabama-ballot-access-case-soon-to-be-before-us-supreme-court/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 02:03:19 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ETJB</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/11/20/alabama-ballot-access-case-soon-to-be-before-us-supreme-court/comment-page-1/#comment-165704</link>
		<dc:creator>ETJB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 21:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/11/20/alabama-ballot-access-case-soon-to-be-before-us-supreme-court/#comment-165704</guid>
		<description>Part of the problem is that the court really seems to believe some things about elections and third parties that impact their views.

I read a good article about this that basically looked at the assmptions that the court has about elections, ballot access, third parties. etc.

I think i have a link on my website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part of the problem is that the court really seems to believe some things about elections and third parties that impact their views.</p>
<p>I read a good article about this that basically looked at the assmptions that the court has about elections, ballot access, third parties. etc.</p>
<p>I think i have a link on my website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darryl W. Perry</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/11/20/alabama-ballot-access-case-soon-to-be-before-us-supreme-court/comment-page-1/#comment-165186</link>
		<dc:creator>Darryl W. Perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 07:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/11/20/alabama-ballot-access-case-soon-to-be-before-us-supreme-court/#comment-165186</guid>
		<description>I hope this law gets overturned, and statewide races have a cap of 5,000 signatures. If 5,000 is all that&#039;s needed for an Independent Presidential candidate, why should more be needed for an Independent Gubernatorial candidate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope this law gets overturned, and statewide races have a cap of 5,000 signatures. If 5,000 is all that&#8217;s needed for an Independent Presidential candidate, why should more be needed for an Independent Gubernatorial candidate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Demo Rep</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/11/20/alabama-ballot-access-case-soon-to-be-before-us-supreme-court/comment-page-1/#comment-164770</link>
		<dc:creator>Demo Rep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/11/20/alabama-ballot-access-case-soon-to-be-before-us-supreme-court/#comment-164770</guid>
		<description>Can the genius lawyers detect that ---

SEPARATE ballot access laws are NOT EQUAL ballot access laws ???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can the genius lawyers detect that &#8212;</p>
<p>SEPARATE ballot access laws are NOT EQUAL ballot access laws ???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
