Comments on: North Carolina Asks U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Redistricting Case http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/11/30/north-carolina-asks-us-supreme-court-to-hear-redistricting-case/ Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:46:59 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Demo Rep http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/11/30/north-carolina-asks-us-supreme-court-to-hear-redistricting-case/comment-page-1/#comment-173020 Demo Rep Sun, 02 Dec 2007 00:01:27 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/11/30/north-carolina-asks-us-supreme-court-to-hear-redistricting-case/#comment-173020 UNEQUAL votes for each gerrymander district winner. UNEQUAL total votes in each gerrymander district. Half the votes in half the gerrymander districts = about 25 percent ANTI-Democracy minority rule (since long before 4 July 1776). Remedy --- Party Seats = Party Votes x Total Seats / Total Votes Much too difficult for the armies of MORONS involved in gerrymander cases to understand. UNEQUAL votes for each gerrymander district winner.

UNEQUAL total votes in each gerrymander district.

Half the votes in half the gerrymander districts = about 25 percent ANTI-Democracy minority rule (since long before 4 July 1776).

Remedy —

Party Seats = Party Votes x Total Seats / Total Votes

Much too difficult for the armies of MORONS involved in gerrymander cases to understand.

]]> By: Joel http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/11/30/north-carolina-asks-us-supreme-court-to-hear-redistricting-case/comment-page-1/#comment-172788 Joel Fri, 30 Nov 2007 20:22:03 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/11/30/north-carolina-asks-us-supreme-court-to-hear-redistricting-case/#comment-172788 This situation in North Carolina would be a good one to mention proportional voting methods as an option to resolve the issue, if the state doesn't go through with a constitutional amendment. This situation in North Carolina would be a good one to mention proportional voting methods as an option to resolve the issue, if the state doesn’t go through with a constitutional amendment.

]]> By: Michael http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/11/30/north-carolina-asks-us-supreme-court-to-hear-redistricting-case/comment-page-1/#comment-172757 Michael Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:44:18 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/11/30/north-carolina-asks-us-supreme-court-to-hear-redistricting-case/#comment-172757 Nothing about the post. It's just that when I read it and it got to the last sentence saying "Alabama Governor", I still expected the next words to be "George C. Wallace". (Paragraph) Man, I still miss him in politics. He didn't go around on both sides of the issues. Nothing about the post. It’s just that when I read it and it got to the last sentence saying “Alabama Governor”, I still expected the next words to be “George C. Wallace”. (Paragraph) Man, I still miss him in politics. He didn’t go around on both sides of the issues.

]]>