<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: U.S. Election Laws Relating to Presidential Elections Are Not as Restrictive As Many Believe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/12/09/us-election-laws-relating-to-presidential-elections-are-not-as-restrictive-as-many-believe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/12/09/us-election-laws-relating-to-presidential-elections-are-not-as-restrictive-as-many-believe/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 13:28:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=8057</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Gaines</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/12/09/us-election-laws-relating-to-presidential-elections-are-not-as-restrictive-as-many-believe/comment-page-1/#comment-181040</link>
		<dc:creator>David Gaines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 21:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/12/09/us-election-laws-relating-to-presidential-elections-are-not-as-restrictive-as-many-believe/#comment-181040</guid>
		<description>Matt:  LOL   And he has a Ph.D. to boot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt:  LOL   And he has a Ph.D. to boot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim R</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/12/09/us-election-laws-relating-to-presidential-elections-are-not-as-restrictive-as-many-believe/comment-page-1/#comment-180455</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 06:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/12/09/us-election-laws-relating-to-presidential-elections-are-not-as-restrictive-as-many-believe/#comment-180455</guid>
		<description>The problem with a fusion ticket at the presidential level could be with naming elector slates.  In Texas, elector candidates have to be affiliated with the party whose candidate they are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with a fusion ticket at the presidential level could be with naming elector slates.  In Texas, elector candidates have to be affiliated with the party whose candidate they are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/12/09/us-election-laws-relating-to-presidential-elections-are-not-as-restrictive-as-many-believe/comment-page-1/#comment-180153</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 19:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/12/09/us-election-laws-relating-to-presidential-elections-are-not-as-restrictive-as-many-believe/#comment-180153</guid>
		<description>Is the USA also out of step with spelling, grammar, and sentence structure?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the USA also out of step with spelling, grammar, and sentence structure?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Wayne Snyder, PhD</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/12/09/us-election-laws-relating-to-presidential-elections-are-not-as-restrictive-as-many-believe/comment-page-1/#comment-179178</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Wayne Snyder, PhD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 20:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/12/09/us-election-laws-relating-to-presidential-elections-are-not-as-restrictive-as-many-believe/#comment-179178</guid>
		<description>Metric non users, disenfranchized tax payers, winner take all Congress verses perpotional represented Parliment[s], still fighting the subdued Russians and Chinese, hugemongous DoD  R&amp;D budget [the completely unnecessary Boeing Fighter F-22 alone], Viet Nam, Gulf War II!

Every one is out of step but the USA! [Any other obvious FACTS that need to be spotlighted?]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Metric non users, disenfranchized tax payers, winner take all Congress verses perpotional represented Parliment[s], still fighting the subdued Russians and Chinese, hugemongous DoD  R&amp;D budget [the completely unnecessary Boeing Fighter F-22 alone], Viet Nam, Gulf War II!</p>
<p>Every one is out of step but the USA! [Any other obvious FACTS that need to be spotlighted?]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/12/09/us-election-laws-relating-to-presidential-elections-are-not-as-restrictive-as-many-believe/comment-page-1/#comment-179171</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 19:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/12/09/us-election-laws-relating-to-presidential-elections-are-not-as-restrictive-as-many-believe/#comment-179171</guid>
		<description>Yeah, from sore loser laws to the metric system. It was a logical progression. Any sane person would have made it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, from sore loser laws to the metric system. It was a logical progression. Any sane person would have made it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Wayne Snyder, PhD</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/12/09/us-election-laws-relating-to-presidential-elections-are-not-as-restrictive-as-many-believe/comment-page-1/#comment-178308</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Wayne Snyder, PhD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 03:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/12/09/us-election-laws-relating-to-presidential-elections-are-not-as-restrictive-as-many-believe/#comment-178308</guid>
		<description>It is a matter of public record that the USA acts more like a global empire than a nation-state. The non voting of out lying &#039;territories&#039; ------much less the Heart of the Capitol in the District of Columbia, is a World Court case waiting to be filed!

Remember, we are the world&#039;s global economic engine, AND WE DO NOT USE THE METRIC SYSTEM. We talk about democracy, and do not practise what we preach.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a matter of public record that the USA acts more like a global empire than a nation-state. The non voting of out lying &#8216;territories&#8217; &#8212;&#8212;much less the Heart of the Capitol in the District of Columbia, is a World Court case waiting to be filed!</p>
<p>Remember, we are the world&#8217;s global economic engine, AND WE DO NOT USE THE METRIC SYSTEM. We talk about democracy, and do not practise what we preach&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/12/09/us-election-laws-relating-to-presidential-elections-are-not-as-restrictive-as-many-believe/comment-page-1/#comment-178307</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 03:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/12/09/us-election-laws-relating-to-presidential-elections-are-not-as-restrictive-as-many-believe/#comment-178307</guid>
		<description>Sore loser.  It would be unconstitutional to keep a candidate for federal office off the ballot because he or she was in prison.  The US Constitution sets for the requirements for president and congress, and states can&#039;t add to them.  Presidential candidates who appeared on ballots even though they were in prison at the time include Eugene Debs, Vincent Hallinan, and Leonard Peltier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sore loser.  It would be unconstitutional to keep a candidate for federal office off the ballot because he or she was in prison.  The US Constitution sets for the requirements for president and congress, and states can&#8217;t add to them.  Presidential candidates who appeared on ballots even though they were in prison at the time include Eugene Debs, Vincent Hallinan, and Leonard Peltier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/12/09/us-election-laws-relating-to-presidential-elections-are-not-as-restrictive-as-many-believe/comment-page-1/#comment-178282</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 02:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2007/12/09/us-election-laws-relating-to-presidential-elections-are-not-as-restrictive-as-many-believe/#comment-178282</guid>
		<description>Was LaRouche kept off of the ballot in Mississippi in 1992 because of the sore loser laws or because he was doing time during the election?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was LaRouche kept off of the ballot in Mississippi in 1992 because of the sore loser laws or because he was doing time during the election?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

