<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Libertarian-Green North Carolina Ballot Access Lawsuit has Hearing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/01/10/libertarian-green-north-carolina-ballot-access-lawsuit-has-hearing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/01/10/libertarian-green-north-carolina-ballot-access-lawsuit-has-hearing/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 10:13:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=5107</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Howe</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/01/10/libertarian-green-north-carolina-ballot-access-lawsuit-has-hearing/comment-page-1/#comment-203919</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Howe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/01/10/libertarian-green-north-carolina-ballot-access-lawsuit-has-hearing/#comment-203919</guid>
		<description>The 90K signatures referenced in the article is a raw number.  While our verification rate is pretty good, we still need 20 to 30 thousand more raw signature to make the threshold.  And we&#039;re nearly broke.  And there&#039;s that pesky law suit to pay for.  When that comes due, we&#039;re past broke.

Mr. Winger is right to say we will surely make it, but if anyone out there can chip in a few bucks, we surely need it --  http://lpnc.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 90K signatures referenced in the article is a raw number.  While our verification rate is pretty good, we still need 20 to 30 thousand more raw signature to make the threshold.  And we&#8217;re nearly broke.  And there&#8217;s that pesky law suit to pay for.  When that comes due, we&#8217;re past broke.</p>
<p>Mr. Winger is right to say we will surely make it, but if anyone out there can chip in a few bucks, we surely need it &#8212;  <a href="http://lpnc.org" rel="nofollow">http://lpnc.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthur DiBianca</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/01/10/libertarian-green-north-carolina-ballot-access-lawsuit-has-hearing/comment-page-1/#comment-203188</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur DiBianca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 17:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/01/10/libertarian-green-north-carolina-ballot-access-lawsuit-has-hearing/#comment-203188</guid>
		<description>This is not the first time that the Libertarian Party has supported ballot access reforms that would actually help other minor parties more than the Libertarian Party.

I&#039;m glad that the Libertarian Party welcomes, rather than fears, competition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not the first time that the Libertarian Party has supported ballot access reforms that would actually help other minor parties more than the Libertarian Party.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad that the Libertarian Party welcomes, rather than fears, competition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

