<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kucinich Texas Ballot Appeal to U.S. Supreme Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/01/18/kucinich-texas-ballot-appeal-to-us-supreme-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/01/18/kucinich-texas-ballot-appeal-to-us-supreme-court/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 09:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=5348</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ralph a. applegate</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/01/18/kucinich-texas-ballot-appeal-to-us-supreme-court/comment-page-1/#comment-212845</link>
		<dc:creator>ralph a. applegate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 06:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/01/18/kucinich-texas-ballot-appeal-to-us-supreme-court/#comment-212845</guid>
		<description>I have currently also been rejected as an Ohio 15th Cong.District candidate because I used white-out, and the &quot;Kangaroo Court&quot; Bd. hearing is tomorrow! It takes 781000 signatures as a person to run for President, even though it requires only 175 signatures in Tennessee and no fee to file there!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have currently also been rejected as an Ohio 15th Cong.District candidate because I used white-out, and the &#8220;Kangaroo Court&#8221; Bd. hearing is tomorrow! It takes 781000 signatures as a person to run for President, even though it requires only 175 signatures in Tennessee and no fee to file there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim R</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/01/18/kucinich-texas-ballot-appeal-to-us-supreme-court/comment-page-1/#comment-211491</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 06:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/01/18/kucinich-texas-ballot-appeal-to-us-supreme-court/#comment-211491</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s even unfairer than that.  It would take 4 million votes to carry Texas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s even unfairer than that.  It would take 4 million votes to carry Texas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darryl W. Perry</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/01/18/kucinich-texas-ballot-appeal-to-us-supreme-court/comment-page-1/#comment-209456</link>
		<dc:creator>Darryl W. Perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/01/18/kucinich-texas-ballot-appeal-to-us-supreme-court/#comment-209456</guid>
		<description>WOW, I love this logic, &quot;You can always run as an independent (even though to do so requires almost 100,000 signatures).&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW, I love this logic, &#8220;You can always run as an independent (even though to do so requires almost 100,000 signatures).&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

