<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: U.S. Supreme Court Says &#8220;No&#8221; to Kucinich on Texas Ballot Access</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/01/18/us-supreme-court-says-no-to-kucinich-on-texas-ballot-access/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/01/18/us-supreme-court-says-no-to-kucinich-on-texas-ballot-access/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 11:51:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=8251</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Demorep</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/01/18/us-supreme-court-says-no-to-kucinich-on-texas-ballot-access/comment-page-1/#comment-209560</link>
		<dc:creator>Demorep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/01/18/us-supreme-court-says-no-to-kucinich-on-texas-ballot-access/#comment-209560</guid>
		<description>http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment01/13.html#6

Employment Restrictions and Loyalty Oaths.
-------
Another machination by the latest gang of party hack Supreme -- putting in doubt about 70 years of *law*.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment01/13.html#6" rel="nofollow">http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment01/13.html#6</a></p>
<p>Employment Restrictions and Loyalty Oaths.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
Another machination by the latest gang of party hack Supreme &#8212; putting in doubt about 70 years of *law*.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

