<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Court Issues TRO to Protect &#8220;Vote for&#8221; Lawn Signs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/02/20/court-issues-tro-to-protect-vote-for-lawn-signs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/02/20/court-issues-tro-to-protect-vote-for-lawn-signs/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 09:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3322</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darryl W. Perry</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/02/20/court-issues-tro-to-protect-vote-for-lawn-signs/comment-page-1/#comment-245680</link>
		<dc:creator>Darryl W. Perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 01:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/02/20/court-issues-tro-to-protect-vote-for-lawn-signs/#comment-245680</guid>
		<description>Yet, in PA you&#039;ll see signs long AFTER the election is over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet, in PA you&#8217;ll see signs long AFTER the election is over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/02/20/court-issues-tro-to-protect-vote-for-lawn-signs/comment-page-1/#comment-245482</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/02/20/court-issues-tro-to-protect-vote-for-lawn-signs/#comment-245482</guid>
		<description>In City of Ladue v Gilleo (1994), the US Supreme Court unanimously struck down a city ordinance (in Missouri) that prohibited all campaign signs on lawns of homeowners.  That is somewhat different than this Pennsylvania case, in which the signs are not banned; they just can&#039;t be put up until 30 days before a primary or an election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In City of Ladue v Gilleo (1994), the US Supreme Court unanimously struck down a city ordinance (in Missouri) that prohibited all campaign signs on lawns of homeowners.  That is somewhat different than this Pennsylvania case, in which the signs are not banned; they just can&#8217;t be put up until 30 days before a primary or an election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Gaines</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/02/20/court-issues-tro-to-protect-vote-for-lawn-signs/comment-page-1/#comment-245346</link>
		<dc:creator>David Gaines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 20:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/02/20/court-issues-tro-to-protect-vote-for-lawn-signs/#comment-245346</guid>
		<description>Interesting.....I thought the Supreme Court nixed all restrictions a long time ago on campaign lawn signs when displayed on private property. Richard, can you cite the relevant precedents?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting&#8230;..I thought the Supreme Court nixed all restrictions a long time ago on campaign lawn signs when displayed on private property. Richard, can you cite the relevant precedents?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

