<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NY Times Features Senator Ernie Chambers, But Neglects to Mention His Time in the New Alliance Party</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/04/29/ny-times-features-senator-ernie-chambers-but-neglects-to-mention-his-time-in-the-new-alliance-party/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/04/29/ny-times-features-senator-ernie-chambers-but-neglects-to-mention-his-time-in-the-new-alliance-party/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:15:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1919</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/04/29/ny-times-features-senator-ernie-chambers-but-neglects-to-mention-his-time-in-the-new-alliance-party/comment-page-1/#comment-347535</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3246#comment-347535</guid>
		<description>&quot;Not surprisingly, he won the NAP nomination unanimously&quot;

actually, i&#039;ve read reports where Kerrey won the NAP nod via write-ins with Chambers in 3rd (with write-ins), Kerrey declined the NAP nod and they nominated Chambers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Not surprisingly, he won the NAP nomination unanimously&#8221;</p>
<p>actually, i&#8217;ve read reports where Kerrey won the NAP nod via write-ins with Chambers in 3rd (with write-ins), Kerrey declined the NAP nod and they nominated Chambers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: citizen1</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/04/29/ny-times-features-senator-ernie-chambers-but-neglects-to-mention-his-time-in-the-new-alliance-party/comment-page-1/#comment-346711</link>
		<dc:creator>citizen1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 04:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3246#comment-346711</guid>
		<description>Maybe a better term on my part would have been pep rally. Anyway if you were not for Obama you did not feel like you belonged.

I also do not understand what point is being made with term limits and the federalist papers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe a better term on my part would have been pep rally. Anyway if you were not for Obama you did not feel like you belonged.</p>
<p>I also do not understand what point is being made with term limits and the federalist papers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NE</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/04/29/ny-times-features-senator-ernie-chambers-but-neglects-to-mention-his-time-in-the-new-alliance-party/comment-page-1/#comment-346700</link>
		<dc:creator>NE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 04:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3246#comment-346700</guid>
		<description>The Federalist Papers opposed term limits!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Federalist Papers opposed term limits!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara Woodruff</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/04/29/ny-times-features-senator-ernie-chambers-but-neglects-to-mention-his-time-in-the-new-alliance-party/comment-page-1/#comment-346665</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara Woodruff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 02:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3246#comment-346665</guid>
		<description>Sorry you have been disappointed in the two CUIP conference calls you participated in citizen1. I&#039;ve been on every call for months and have not encountered any such strategy sessions.  It is an election year so there has been much chatter surrounding that.  And since Senator Obama is reaching out to progressive thinking independents, there is much talk among us on his campaign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry you have been disappointed in the two CUIP conference calls you participated in citizen1. I&#8217;ve been on every call for months and have not encountered any such strategy sessions.  It is an election year so there has been much chatter surrounding that.  And since Senator Obama is reaching out to progressive thinking independents, there is much talk among us on his campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DonLake@sbc global.net</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/04/29/ny-times-features-senator-ernie-chambers-but-neglects-to-mention-his-time-in-the-new-alliance-party/comment-page-1/#comment-346653</link>
		<dc:creator>DonLake@sbc global.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 02:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3246#comment-346653</guid>
		<description>I sure do not &#039;get&#039; what CUIP is all about!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sure do not &#8216;get&#8217; what CUIP is all about!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: citizen1</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/04/29/ny-times-features-senator-ernie-chambers-but-neglects-to-mention-his-time-in-the-new-alliance-party/comment-page-1/#comment-346651</link>
		<dc:creator>citizen1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 02:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3246#comment-346651</guid>
		<description>Have you ever been on a CUIP conference call? The two I was on were Obama  strategy sessions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever been on a CUIP conference call? The two I was on were Obama  strategy sessions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

