<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: North Carolina Legislature Reconvenes; Could Impact on Ballot Access</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/05/13/north-carolina-legislature-reconvenes-could-impact-on-ballot-access/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/05/13/north-carolina-legislature-reconvenes-could-impact-on-ballot-access/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 10:13:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=8360</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Demo Rep</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/05/13/north-carolina-legislature-reconvenes-could-impact-on-ballot-access/comment-page-1/#comment-367622</link>
		<dc:creator>Demo Rep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 22:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3297#comment-367622</guid>
		<description>How much $$$ to do a PROPER ballot access case about SEPARATE - IS - NOT - EQUAL ???

Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483, 495 (1954).

I.E. to have 1 or more EQUAL tests for ALL candidates for the SAME office in the SAME area to get on the ballots ???

I.E. An EQUAL nominating petition to show preliminary support from the Electors.

This AIN&#039;T atomic physics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much $$$ to do a PROPER ballot access case about SEPARATE &#8211; IS &#8211; NOT &#8211; EQUAL ???</p>
<p>Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483, 495 (1954).</p>
<p>I.E. to have 1 or more EQUAL tests for ALL candidates for the SAME office in the SAME area to get on the ballots ???</p>
<p>I.E. An EQUAL nominating petition to show preliminary support from the Electors.</p>
<p>This AIN&#8217;T atomic physics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Howe</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/05/13/north-carolina-legislature-reconvenes-could-impact-on-ballot-access/comment-page-1/#comment-365295</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Howe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 14:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3297#comment-365295</guid>
		<description>Here in NC, we are scheduled to turn in $128,000 (plus) worth of petitions on Thursday.  After the SBOE verifies them, the LPNC will be back on the ballot.

Unless... we win the court case, wherein we ask the judge to declare an entire chapter of state law unconstitutional and to enjoin the SBoE from enforcing it.  That&#039;s the chapter that describes those petitions and what to do about them.

Irony!!

Of course, it&#039;s very unlikely that both (a) we win and (b) the State does not ask for a stay while it appeals.  (Unless the state&#039;s attorneys are reading these posts?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here in NC, we are scheduled to turn in $128,000 (plus) worth of petitions on Thursday.  After the SBOE verifies them, the LPNC will be back on the ballot.</p>
<p>Unless&#8230; we win the court case, wherein we ask the judge to declare an entire chapter of state law unconstitutional and to enjoin the SBoE from enforcing it.  That&#8217;s the chapter that describes those petitions and what to do about them.</p>
<p>Irony!!</p>
<p>Of course, it&#8217;s very unlikely that both (a) we win and (b) the State does not ask for a stay while it appeals.  (Unless the state&#8217;s attorneys are reading these posts?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/05/13/north-carolina-legislature-reconvenes-could-impact-on-ballot-access/comment-page-1/#comment-364609</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 23:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3297#comment-364609</guid>
		<description>Lets hope North Carolina finally gets a reasonable requirements for Third Parties and Independents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets hope North Carolina finally gets a reasonable requirements for Third Parties and Independents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

