<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Atlanta Journal-Constitution Article on Libertarian Convention</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/05/26/atlanta-journal-constitution-article-on-libertarian-convention/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/05/26/atlanta-journal-constitution-article-on-libertarian-convention/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 11:51:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2967</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Sawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/05/26/atlanta-journal-constitution-article-on-libertarian-convention/comment-page-1/#comment-384163</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Sawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 02:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3368#comment-384163</guid>
		<description>You are most likely correct, Bob Wayne.  Bob Barr will probably be the most successful presidential candidate that the Libertarian Party has ever had.

The Libertarian Party should have chosen former senator Eugene J. McCarthy in 1980.  No, he did not actively seek the nomination.  However, I do think that he probably would have accepted the nod.  Would not that have been something?  A four-way race between John B. Anderson, Jimmy Carter, Eugene J. McCarthy, and Ronald Reagan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are most likely correct, Bob Wayne.  Bob Barr will probably be the most successful presidential candidate that the Libertarian Party has ever had.</p>
<p>The Libertarian Party should have chosen former senator Eugene J. McCarthy in 1980.  No, he did not actively seek the nomination.  However, I do think that he probably would have accepted the nod.  Would not that have been something?  A four-way race between John B. Anderson, Jimmy Carter, Eugene J. McCarthy, and Ronald Reagan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BOB WAYNE</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/05/26/atlanta-journal-constitution-article-on-libertarian-convention/comment-page-1/#comment-383710</link>
		<dc:creator>BOB WAYNE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 16:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3368#comment-383710</guid>
		<description>BOB BARR IS THE GREATEST THING THAT EVER HAPPENED TO THE LP. I PREDICT HE WILL RECEIVE A RECORD NUMBER OF VOTES.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BOB BARR IS THE GREATEST THING THAT EVER HAPPENED TO THE LP. I PREDICT HE WILL RECEIVE A RECORD NUMBER OF VOTES.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad  Forschner</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/05/26/atlanta-journal-constitution-article-on-libertarian-convention/comment-page-1/#comment-383604</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad  Forschner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 15:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3368#comment-383604</guid>
		<description>Agenda or no agenda, dynamics or not.

Probably what is most important to me is Ballot Access.

In GA, a Barr showing of 20% or better places the LP into Major Party status, removing the ballot access barriers for the LP at the local level.  Currently signatures of 10% of registered voters are required to be placed on the ballot.

Not only GA has this opportunity.  A strong Barr showing could open ballot access in several states.   The focus here should be how to focus the campaign to take the most advantage of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agenda or no agenda, dynamics or not.</p>
<p>Probably what is most important to me is Ballot Access.</p>
<p>In GA, a Barr showing of 20% or better places the LP into Major Party status, removing the ballot access barriers for the LP at the local level.  Currently signatures of 10% of registered voters are required to be placed on the ballot.</p>
<p>Not only GA has this opportunity.  A strong Barr showing could open ballot access in several states.   The focus here should be how to focus the campaign to take the most advantage of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Dondero</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/05/26/atlanta-journal-constitution-article-on-libertarian-convention/comment-page-1/#comment-383290</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Dondero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 11:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3368#comment-383290</guid>
		<description>The AJC most certainly has an agenda.  It was quite clear by their coverage of the Barr nomination.  They&#039;re using the reverse Rush Limbaugh Chaos strategy, of playing up dissension on the Right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The AJC most certainly has an agenda.  It was quite clear by their coverage of the Barr nomination.  They&#8217;re using the reverse Rush Limbaugh Chaos strategy, of playing up dissension on the Right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/05/26/atlanta-journal-constitution-article-on-libertarian-convention/comment-page-1/#comment-382786</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 02:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3368#comment-382786</guid>
		<description>I think the reason the AJC has ran several stories about Bob Barr on the front page the past couple weeks since he declared is fairly simply with no secret motive.  He is a well known figure in Metro Atlanta and wrote a regular editoral column for the AJC. Those are the two reasons I would say why the AJC has been giving him large amounts of coverage and will continue to. 

The liberal angle doesn&#039;t really explain why Barr is getting alot of coverage in Georgia. My local county paper is very republican leaning and it has run 2 or 3 stories about Barr on their front page since he declared and dedicated their main editoral column to his candidacy one day. Barr is just well known in Georgia. So he will get plenty of coverage here for that reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the reason the AJC has ran several stories about Bob Barr on the front page the past couple weeks since he declared is fairly simply with no secret motive.  He is a well known figure in Metro Atlanta and wrote a regular editoral column for the AJC. Those are the two reasons I would say why the AJC has been giving him large amounts of coverage and will continue to. </p>
<p>The liberal angle doesn&#8217;t really explain why Barr is getting alot of coverage in Georgia. My local county paper is very republican leaning and it has run 2 or 3 stories about Barr on their front page since he declared and dedicated their main editoral column to his candidacy one day. Barr is just well known in Georgia. So he will get plenty of coverage here for that reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregg Jocoy</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/05/26/atlanta-journal-constitution-article-on-libertarian-convention/comment-page-1/#comment-382767</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregg Jocoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 02:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3368#comment-382767</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t recall which TV station I was watching, but the local TV station did do a five second soundbite.  I guess if I had to characterize what was said, it was something like 

&quot;The Libertarian Party choose their Presidential nominee this weekend in Denver.  Former Georgia Congressman Bob Barr of Georgia was nominated.  Barr was best known for his role in the Clinton impeachment.&quot;

I&#039;m not a Libertarian, so I can&#039;t say if that is worth any compromises anyone might think were made, but to be 100% honest, there is no way my local TV station would have covered a Ruwart nomination.  Not in Denver.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t recall which TV station I was watching, but the local TV station did do a five second soundbite.  I guess if I had to characterize what was said, it was something like </p>
<p>&#8220;The Libertarian Party choose their Presidential nominee this weekend in Denver.  Former Georgia Congressman Bob Barr of Georgia was nominated.  Barr was best known for his role in the Clinton impeachment.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a Libertarian, so I can&#8217;t say if that is worth any compromises anyone might think were made, but to be 100% honest, there is no way my local TV station would have covered a Ruwart nomination.  Not in Denver.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Gillespie</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/05/26/atlanta-journal-constitution-article-on-libertarian-convention/comment-page-1/#comment-382755</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Gillespie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 01:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3368#comment-382755</guid>
		<description>An article in the AJC several days ago contended that a Barr Libertarian candidacy could put Georgia
in play in November; not as Libertarians and 
opponents of duopoly might hope, but that Barr may
well draw enough Georgia votes from McCain to 
give Georgia&#039;s 15 electoral votes to Obama.  That
may be one reason for AJC&#039;s interest in LP events
yesterday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An article in the AJC several days ago contended that a Barr Libertarian candidacy could put Georgia<br />
in play in November; not as Libertarians and<br />
opponents of duopoly might hope, but that Barr may<br />
well draw enough Georgia votes from McCain to<br />
give Georgia&#8217;s 15 electoral votes to Obama.  That<br />
may be one reason for AJC&#8217;s interest in LP events<br />
yesterday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Sawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/05/26/atlanta-journal-constitution-article-on-libertarian-convention/comment-page-1/#comment-382696</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Sawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 23:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3368#comment-382696</guid>
		<description>That is one of the many reasons why we need a mass Party of the People.  I do not think that Libertarians would be comfortable in such an organization, though.  Perhaps you all can be the main opposition party when a unified leftist coalition comes to power in this country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is one of the many reasons why we need a mass Party of the People.  I do not think that Libertarians would be comfortable in such an organization, though.  Perhaps you all can be the main opposition party when a unified leftist coalition comes to power in this country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/05/26/atlanta-journal-constitution-article-on-libertarian-convention/comment-page-1/#comment-382550</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 18:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3368#comment-382550</guid>
		<description>if people son&#039;t protest in masses it will never get covered</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if people son&#8217;t protest in masses it will never get covered</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/05/26/atlanta-journal-constitution-article-on-libertarian-convention/comment-page-1/#comment-382549</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 18:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3368#comment-382549</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s a shame I saw no news on cable news or local news or any news. I wonder if Libertarians emailed FoxNews and CNN on the matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s a shame I saw no news on cable news or local news or any news. I wonder if Libertarians emailed FoxNews and CNN on the matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

