<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Libertarian Party May Need to Sue Massachusetts to Get Bob Barr on Ballot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/06/10/libertarian-party-may-need-to-sue-massachusetts-to-get-bob-barr-on-ballot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/06/10/libertarian-party-may-need-to-sue-massachusetts-to-get-bob-barr-on-ballot/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 10:38:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=8662</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: djahn</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/06/10/libertarian-party-may-need-to-sue-massachusetts-to-get-bob-barr-on-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-424672</link>
		<dc:creator>djahn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 15:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3450#comment-424672</guid>
		<description>Brandon, I&#039;m sure there are accomodations in the law for the major parties.  It just these pesky little challenger parties that need restrictions. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brandon, I&#8217;m sure there are accomodations in the law for the major parties.  It just these pesky little challenger parties that need restrictions. ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Magoon</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/06/10/libertarian-party-may-need-to-sue-massachusetts-to-get-bob-barr-on-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-402679</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Magoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 09:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3450#comment-402679</guid>
		<description>According to this logic the Democrats would have to run Clinton in Massachusetts since she won the primary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to this logic the Democrats would have to run Clinton in Massachusetts since she won the primary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/06/10/libertarian-party-may-need-to-sue-massachusetts-to-get-bob-barr-on-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-401701</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 04:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3450#comment-401701</guid>
		<description>The Massachusetts Secrtary of State is a Democrat.  It may just be the bureacratic mentality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Massachusetts Secrtary of State is a Democrat.  It may just be the bureacratic mentality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Dondero</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/06/10/libertarian-party-may-need-to-sue-massachusetts-to-get-bob-barr-on-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-401652</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Dondero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 02:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3450#comment-401652</guid>
		<description>This is complete BullSh*t!  Those bastards.  From what you write here Richard, the court cases are completely clear, and indicate that the stand-ins is permitted and has precedence.  

There&#039;s some politics involved somewheres in this, no doubt.

What is the Party affiliation of the MA Elections Div. Legal Counsel and others involved in this?  What might be their motivation to keep the LP off the ballot?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is complete BullSh*t!  Those bastards.  From what you write here Richard, the court cases are completely clear, and indicate that the stand-ins is permitted and has precedence.  </p>
<p>There&#8217;s some politics involved somewheres in this, no doubt.</p>
<p>What is the Party affiliation of the MA Elections Div. Legal Counsel and others involved in this?  What might be their motivation to keep the LP off the ballot?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

