Comments on: California AIP State Convention Chooses Electors Pledged to Baldwin http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/06/30/california-aip-state-convention-chooses-electors-pledged-to-baldwin/ Sun, 12 Feb 2012 10:13:48 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=6738 By: Larry http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/06/30/california-aip-state-convention-chooses-electors-pledged-to-baldwin/comment-page-1/#comment-432357 Larry Fri, 11 Jul 2008 00:43:14 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3567#comment-432357 And these are the people that make fun of Libertarians? And these are the people that make fun of Libertarians?

]]> By: Donald Raymond Lake http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/06/30/california-aip-state-convention-chooses-electors-pledged-to-baldwin/comment-page-1/#comment-424457 Donald Raymond Lake Fri, 04 Jul 2008 05:19:38 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3567#comment-424457 Chairman Jim King and One Response to “Statement from the new AIP Chairman, Jim King” 1. Open Letter From Don Lake Says: July 3rd, 2008 at 10:45 pm Citizens For A Better Veterans Home: ‘Hmmmm. The same James King of San Bernardino County whom has been ignoring the lethal plight of disabled veterans in your own neighborhood for over a decade? The same guy whom never visited the worst veterans care campus on the planet, the Veterans Home of California at Barstow, after request after request? You had a state officer in Yountville whom you claimed that he [in 1999] saw nothing wrong going on. Hmmmm. Some vision? Barstow [to the tune of $11M] costs the state taxpayers as for only the second time in federal history, monies ear marked for a care campus were suspended for negligent operations. Dozens of patients have suffers and even died. The San Bernardino County coroners and the state Department of Health Services have declared one ‘negligent homicide’ after an other! Dozens of DHS and other fines up to $100K. The only veterans home [2 national, 164 state] in the nation with out a SNF [‘sniff’ or Skilled Nursing Facility! The only one. [It was closed down by CALVETS/ CDVA!] Mister King, you owe us an apology and you and the ole AIP corps need to buy some glasses! Happy Fourth of July, you self congratulating son of a bitch and veterans hater! Chairman Jim King and One Response to “Statement from the new AIP Chairman, Jim King”

1. Open Letter From Don Lake Says:
July 3rd, 2008 at 10:45 pm

Citizens For A Better Veterans Home:

‘Hmmmm. The same James King of San Bernardino County whom has been ignoring the lethal plight of disabled veterans in your own neighborhood for over a decade? The same guy whom never visited the worst veterans care campus on the planet, the Veterans Home of California at Barstow, after request after request?

You had a state officer in Yountville whom you claimed that he [in 1999] saw nothing wrong going on. Hmmmm. Some vision? Barstow [to the tune of $11M] costs the state taxpayers as for only the second time in federal history, monies ear marked for a care campus were suspended for negligent operations.

Dozens of patients have suffers and even died. The San Bernardino County coroners and the state Department of Health Services have declared one ‘negligent homicide’ after an other!

Dozens of DHS and other fines up to $100K. The only veterans home [2 national, 164 state] in the nation with out a SNF [‘sniff’ or Skilled Nursing Facility! The only one. [It was closed down by CALVETS/ CDVA!]

Mister King, you owe us an apology and you and the ole AIP corps need to buy some glasses!

Happy Fourth of July, you self congratulating son of a bitch and veterans hater!

]]> By: Cody Quirk http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/06/30/california-aip-state-convention-chooses-electors-pledged-to-baldwin/comment-page-1/#comment-422948 Cody Quirk Wed, 02 Jul 2008 23:47:01 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3567#comment-422948 It appears that the Noonan gang has registered a new domain, www.aip-ca.com When you enter the "old" URL you are immediately redirected to the Noonan web site. Apparently Jim King got control of the website, but the Ed Noonan gang knew how to hack into it. It appears that the Noonan gang has registered a new domain, http://www.aip-ca.com
When you enter the “old” URL you are immediately redirected to the Noonan web site.

Apparently Jim King got control of the website, but the Ed Noonan gang knew how to hack into it.

]]> By: Michael Cox @ Mike's World News: Politics http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/06/30/california-aip-state-convention-chooses-electors-pledged-to-baldwin/comment-page-1/#comment-422379 Michael Cox @ Mike's World News: Politics Wed, 02 Jul 2008 09:07:20 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3567#comment-422379 I noticed that aipca.org has been redirected to aip-ca.com (which was registered on 1 July 08 according to Internic). This "new American Independent Party" website claims that they are no longer affilated with the Constitution Party. Any news on that front? I noticed that aipca.org has been redirected to aip-ca.com (which was registered on 1 July 08 according to Internic). This “new American Independent Party” website claims that they are no longer affilated with the Constitution Party. Any news on that front?

]]> By: Richard http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/06/30/california-aip-state-convention-chooses-electors-pledged-to-baldwin/comment-page-1/#comment-421638 Richard Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:34:21 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3567#comment-421638 But in Connecticut, the Concerned Citizens Party isn't ballot-qualified anymore anyway, for any statewide offices nor for any US House races. So if the Connecticut Concerned Citizens Party wants to switch its name to the Constitution Party, no harm done, except for the loss of qualified status in just 5 state house districts. But in Connecticut, the Concerned Citizens Party isn’t ballot-qualified anymore anyway, for any statewide offices nor for any US House races. So if the Connecticut Concerned Citizens Party wants to switch its name to the Constitution Party, no harm done, except for the loss of qualified status in just 5 state house districts.

]]> By: citizen1 http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/06/30/california-aip-state-convention-chooses-electors-pledged-to-baldwin/comment-page-1/#comment-421487 citizen1 Tue, 01 Jul 2008 18:46:44 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3567#comment-421487 In CT we have been told we need to start a new party in order to change the name also. In CT we have been told we need to start a new party in order to change the name also.

]]> By: Richard http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/06/30/california-aip-state-convention-chooses-electors-pledged-to-baldwin/comment-page-1/#comment-421437 Richard Tue, 01 Jul 2008 16:51:39 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3567#comment-421437 The Michigan US Taxpayers Party has twice been provided with funds to pay for a lawsuit over the issue of whether they may change their name. The election law says a Michigan ballot-qualified party is free to change its logo, but the law is silent about the name. Michigan does not have registration by party. But the Michigan US Taxpayers Party has turned down the legal help both times. They like their name the way it is. It is unfortunate, because there has never been a lawsuit on whether the First Amendment protects a party's right to change its name. Most states permit it, so no lawsuits have been needed. It would be a good test case if the Michigan US Taxpayers Party would sue. The Michigan US Taxpayers Party has twice been provided with funds to pay for a lawsuit over the issue of whether they may change their name. The election law says a Michigan ballot-qualified party is free to change its logo, but the law is silent about the name. Michigan does not have registration by party. But the Michigan US Taxpayers Party has turned down the legal help both times. They like their name the way it is. It is unfortunate, because there has never been a lawsuit on whether the First Amendment protects a party’s right to change its name. Most states permit it, so no lawsuits have been needed. It would be a good test case if the Michigan US Taxpayers Party would sue.

]]> By: Doremus Jessup http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/06/30/california-aip-state-convention-chooses-electors-pledged-to-baldwin/comment-page-1/#comment-421428 Doremus Jessup Tue, 01 Jul 2008 16:35:18 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3567#comment-421428 "What's in a name?" - Shakespeare Well, apparantly a lot of HARD WORK. Ballot access laws in some states are tougher than others. The Michigan CP affiliate, the "U.S. Taxpayer's Party", tried to change it's name to "Constitution Party of Michigan" but was told that they'd have to petition and requalify for ballot access all over again if they did. I am guessing that the same is the case for the AIP in California. What a pain !! Clearly the big-box parties DO NOT want any competition and continue to make ballot access laws more and more difficult. “What’s in a name?” – Shakespeare

Well, apparantly a lot of HARD WORK. Ballot access laws in some states are tougher than others. The Michigan CP affiliate, the “U.S. Taxpayer’s Party”, tried to change it’s name to “Constitution Party of Michigan” but was told that they’d have to petition and requalify for ballot access all over again if they did.

I am guessing that the same is the case for the AIP in California. What a pain !! Clearly the big-box parties DO NOT want any competition and continue to make ballot access laws more and more difficult.

]]> By: Donald Raymond Lake http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/06/30/california-aip-state-convention-chooses-electors-pledged-to-baldwin/comment-page-1/#comment-421427 Donald Raymond Lake Tue, 01 Jul 2008 16:31:52 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3567#comment-421427 On veterans: Both Northern Californian AIP/ CP types Edward Noonan and IRS fighter Donald J. Grunnman, "get it"! On veterans:
Both Northern Californian AIP/ CP types Edward Noonan and IRS fighter Donald J. Grunnman, “get it”!

]]> By: Michael http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/06/30/california-aip-state-convention-chooses-electors-pledged-to-baldwin/comment-page-1/#comment-421379 Michael Tue, 01 Jul 2008 15:56:07 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3567#comment-421379 Governor Wallace was not a racist. He was a political segregationist, and he left those views behind many years before he died in 1998. Governor Wallace was not a racist. He was a political segregationist, and he left those views behind many years before he died in 1998.

]]>