<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Illinois Challenges to Any Presidential Petition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/06/30/no-illinois-challenges-to-any-presidential-petition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/06/30/no-illinois-challenges-to-any-presidential-petition/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:30:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=5626</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zeleni</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/06/30/no-illinois-challenges-to-any-presidential-petition/comment-page-1/#comment-422873</link>
		<dc:creator>Zeleni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 18:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3565#comment-422873</guid>
		<description>Phil,

Stufflebeam actually received 0.5% of the vote.  He received 19,020 votes with a total of 3,486,671.  That&#039;s still impressive for a write-in that received little coverage, but it&#039;s a far cry from 2.8%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil,</p>
<p>Stufflebeam actually received 0.5% of the vote.  He received 19,020 votes with a total of 3,486,671.  That&#8217;s still impressive for a write-in that received little coverage, but it&#8217;s a far cry from 2.8%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhilCollins</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/06/30/no-illinois-challenges-to-any-presidential-petition/comment-page-1/#comment-422709</link>
		<dc:creator>PhilCollins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3565#comment-422709</guid>
		<description>Michael, I agree.  I voted for Stufflebeam, and he got 2.8%, as a write-in candidate.  This year, the Constitution Party&#039;s U.S. Senate candidate is Chad Koppie.  In 1998, he ran for governor, in the republican primary, and he got 19%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael, I agree.  I voted for Stufflebeam, and he got 2.8%, as a write-in candidate.  This year, the Constitution Party&#8217;s U.S. Senate candidate is Chad Koppie.  In 1998, he ran for governor, in the republican primary, and he got 19%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zeleni</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/06/30/no-illinois-challenges-to-any-presidential-petition/comment-page-1/#comment-422310</link>
		<dc:creator>Zeleni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 06:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3565#comment-422310</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d wager a lot of it comes down to Obama having Illinois locked down.  However, the Greens are established in Illinois, and I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if the Democrats let Nader slide to &quot;split&quot; the Green/left vote.  It&#039;s possible that Barr could get 5% in Illinois, which would establish the Libertarian Party for the statewide offices in 2010.  I&#039;m a little surprised the Republicans didn&#039;t challenge with that mind.  I&#039;ll be sticking with the Green (hopefully McKinney), but I&#039;m glad other voters will have more choices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d wager a lot of it comes down to Obama having Illinois locked down.  However, the Greens are established in Illinois, and I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if the Democrats let Nader slide to &#8220;split&#8221; the Green/left vote.  It&#8217;s possible that Barr could get 5% in Illinois, which would establish the Libertarian Party for the statewide offices in 2010.  I&#8217;m a little surprised the Republicans didn&#8217;t challenge with that mind.  I&#8217;ll be sticking with the Green (hopefully McKinney), but I&#8217;m glad other voters will have more choices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/06/30/no-illinois-challenges-to-any-presidential-petition/comment-page-1/#comment-421383</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 15:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3565#comment-421383</guid>
		<description>Stufflebeam would have gotten a lot more votes had he been on the ballot instead of as a write-in candidate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stufflebeam would have gotten a lot more votes had he been on the ballot instead of as a write-in candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patriotic Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/06/30/no-illinois-challenges-to-any-presidential-petition/comment-page-1/#comment-421327</link>
		<dc:creator>Patriotic Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 15:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3565#comment-421327</guid>
		<description>The stategy as I have come to understand it is that because the Greens and the Libertarians had so many signatures, an objection would probably not have been sustained after spending thousands of dollars by either of the two major parties.  So they decided to NOT object to the other third party candidates in hope that they will siphon off votes from the other third party candidates.

This is playing with fire and the Constitution Party supporters could be the sleeper given the fact that Stufflebeam got 20,000 votes in the race for governor in 2006.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The stategy as I have come to understand it is that because the Greens and the Libertarians had so many signatures, an objection would probably not have been sustained after spending thousands of dollars by either of the two major parties.  So they decided to NOT object to the other third party candidates in hope that they will siphon off votes from the other third party candidates.</p>
<p>This is playing with fire and the Constitution Party supporters could be the sleeper given the fact that Stufflebeam got 20,000 votes in the race for governor in 2006.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NewFederalist</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/06/30/no-illinois-challenges-to-any-presidential-petition/comment-page-1/#comment-420782</link>
		<dc:creator>NewFederalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 12:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3565#comment-420782</guid>
		<description>... or everyone was asleep!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; or everyone was asleep!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laine</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/06/30/no-illinois-challenges-to-any-presidential-petition/comment-page-1/#comment-420573</link>
		<dc:creator>Laine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 03:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3565#comment-420573</guid>
		<description>Well I guess Obama doesn&#039;t believe Nader will be a threat to him in his home state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I guess Obama doesn&#8217;t believe Nader will be a threat to him in his home state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/06/30/no-illinois-challenges-to-any-presidential-petition/comment-page-1/#comment-420536</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 01:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3565#comment-420536</guid>
		<description>Baldwin too, even though only 300 signed the petition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Baldwin too, even though only 300 signed the petition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/06/30/no-illinois-challenges-to-any-presidential-petition/comment-page-1/#comment-420535</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 01:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3565#comment-420535</guid>
		<description>Good news for Barr: with Illinois being clearly an Obama state coupled with the dissatisfied Republicans, Barr could pull down a lot of votes in Illinois.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good news for Barr: with Illinois being clearly an Obama state coupled with the dissatisfied Republicans, Barr could pull down a lot of votes in Illinois.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

