<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Arizona Supreme Court Says Signatures with PO Box Address are Valid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/07/07/arizona-supreme-court-rules-today-on-whether-petition-signatures-with-po-box-address-are-valid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/07/07/arizona-supreme-court-rules-today-on-whether-petition-signatures-with-po-box-address-are-valid/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:15:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3038</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry West</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/07/07/arizona-supreme-court-rules-today-on-whether-petition-signatures-with-po-box-address-are-valid/comment-page-1/#comment-429036</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 18:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3601#comment-429036</guid>
		<description>If they had outlawed PO Boxes, what about &quot;General Delivery,&quot; which is not a physical address either? This would eliminate about half of the registered voters in some rural Kentucky counties, and probably some in rural Arizona as well. A P.O. Box for some people is just a non-generic general delivery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they had outlawed PO Boxes, what about &#8220;General Delivery,&#8221; which is not a physical address either? This would eliminate about half of the registered voters in some rural Kentucky counties, and probably some in rural Arizona as well. A P.O. Box for some people is just a non-generic general delivery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Demo Rep</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/07/07/arizona-supreme-court-rules-today-on-whether-petition-signatures-with-po-box-address-are-valid/comment-page-1/#comment-428883</link>
		<dc:creator>Demo Rep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3601#comment-428883</guid>
		<description>How many folks reside inside a P.O. Box ??? --- taking note that in rural areas there may NOT be official residence / street addresses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many folks reside inside a P.O. Box ??? &#8212; taking note that in rural areas there may NOT be official residence / street addresses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/07/07/arizona-supreme-court-rules-today-on-whether-petition-signatures-with-po-box-address-are-valid/comment-page-1/#comment-427668</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 16:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3601#comment-427668</guid>
		<description>If a P.O. Box is listed on a person&#039;s voter registration form as a secondary address,  I see no reason why it can&#039;t count for being a valid address as a part of a petition signature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If a P.O. Box is listed on a person&#8217;s voter registration form as a secondary address,  I see no reason why it can&#8217;t count for being a valid address as a part of a petition signature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

