<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kansas Secretary of State Accepts Reform Party Paperwork for President</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/07/08/kansas-secretary-of-state-accepts-reform-party-paperwork-for-president/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/07/08/kansas-secretary-of-state-accepts-reform-party-paperwork-for-president/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 21:24:39 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DonLake@sbcglo bal.net</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/07/08/kansas-secretary-of-state-accepts-reform-party-paperwork-for-president/comment-page-1/#comment-448302</link>
		<dc:creator>DonLake@sbcglo bal.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 03:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3610#comment-448302</guid>
		<description>Philip, philip, philip:

The Ed Noonan ticket will be printed by the most populated state in the current union. The court action will not occur until after the November election or too close to the election to have the ballots reprinted!

Alan Keyes will be on the ballot, and you are talking like an idiot! What were you thinking?

What can we expect from a Gray Davis and John Kerry supporter?

You are a former PFPer due to the FACT that you have moved your registration from PFP at least one. You may be a current PFPer, but you are also a former PFPer!

You are proven wrong and you deflect, deflect, deflect!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Philip, philip, philip:</p>
<p>The Ed Noonan ticket will be printed by the most populated state in the current union. The court action will not occur until after the November election or too close to the election to have the ballots reprinted!</p>
<p>Alan Keyes will be on the ballot, and you are talking like an idiot! What were you thinking?</p>
<p>What can we expect from a Gray Davis and John Kerry supporter?</p>
<p>You are a former PFPer due to the FACT that you have moved your registration from PFP at least one. You may be a current PFPer, but you are also a former PFPer!</p>
<p>You are proven wrong and you deflect, deflect, deflect!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Sawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/07/08/kansas-secretary-of-state-accepts-reform-party-paperwork-for-president/comment-page-1/#comment-433360</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Sawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 02:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3610#comment-433360</guid>
		<description>Actually, &quot;the jury is still out&quot; in California.  It could be either Chuck Baldwin or Alan Keyes.

In addition, &quot;End the Empire&quot; is incorrect about the presumptive nominees of the two larger parties.  I am not going to get into the negativity thing; you have not even give Senators McCain and Obama a chance yet.  I will say that there have been some choices in recent history (since 1960) that have been very poor.  For the Democrats:  Lyndon Johnson in 1964 and Hubert Humphrey in 1968.  For the Republicans:  Richard Nixon in 1960, 1968, and 1972; and George W. Bush in 2000 and 2004.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, &#8220;the jury is still out&#8221; in California.  It could be either Chuck Baldwin or Alan Keyes.</p>
<p>In addition, &#8220;End the Empire&#8221; is incorrect about the presumptive nominees of the two larger parties.  I am not going to get into the negativity thing; you have not even give Senators McCain and Obama a chance yet.  I will say that there have been some choices in recent history (since 1960) that have been very poor.  For the Democrats:  Lyndon Johnson in 1964 and Hubert Humphrey in 1968.  For the Republicans:  Richard Nixon in 1960, 1968, and 1972; and George W. Bush in 2000 and 2004.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: End the Empire</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/07/08/kansas-secretary-of-state-accepts-reform-party-paperwork-for-president/comment-page-1/#comment-432569</link>
		<dc:creator>End the Empire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 11:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3610#comment-432569</guid>
		<description>Dr. BaldWIN needs a few more to reach the 400 EC Vote range. Anyone from NY Right to Life in the house? 
Alaska - Alaskan Independence Party
California - American Independent Party
Nevada - Independent American Party
Colorado - American Constitution Party
Nebraska - Nebraska Party
Michigan - US Taxpayer&#039;s Party
Conneticut - Concerned Citizen&#039;s Party
Kansas - Reform Party
Many states - Independent
Many states - Constitution Party
All told--Baldwin will appear on the ballot using 10 different affilliations.

hppt://BaldWIN08.com

D.R.Lake, you are CORRECT SIR! These D &amp; R nominees are the WORST in our lifetimes. Anyone disagree? Name two WORSE! 

All third party candidates need to put forth solid campaigns this year. Our problems belong to the Ds and Rs and we must remind america who to blame...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. BaldWIN needs a few more to reach the 400 EC Vote range. Anyone from NY Right to Life in the house?<br />
Alaska &#8211; Alaskan Independence Party<br />
California &#8211; American Independent Party<br />
Nevada &#8211; Independent American Party<br />
Colorado &#8211; American Constitution Party<br />
Nebraska &#8211; Nebraska Party<br />
Michigan &#8211; US Taxpayer&#8217;s Party<br />
Conneticut &#8211; Concerned Citizen&#8217;s Party<br />
Kansas &#8211; Reform Party<br />
Many states &#8211; Independent<br />
Many states &#8211; Constitution Party<br />
All told&#8211;Baldwin will appear on the ballot using 10 different affilliations.</p>
<p>hppt://BaldWIN08.com</p>
<p>D.R.Lake, you are CORRECT SIR! These D &amp; R nominees are the WORST in our lifetimes. Anyone disagree? Name two WORSE! </p>
<p>All third party candidates need to put forth solid campaigns this year. Our problems belong to the Ds and Rs and we must remind america who to blame&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald Raymond Lake</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/07/08/kansas-secretary-of-state-accepts-reform-party-paperwork-for-president/comment-page-1/#comment-430126</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald Raymond Lake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 18:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3610#comment-430126</guid>
		<description>Lester:  While Mister Nader is an American icon, I have personally lived your complaint. I may [in a solid, million plus margin, Democratic Party state] vote for &#039;Naders&#039; Raiders&#039; yet again. But he is basically past &#039;shelf date&#039; [tho no more than Insane McCain!] and his staff drives off good hearted [and locally knowledgable] volunteers on a whole sale basis. Telling that most Naders Raiders do NOT sign up for a second round of abuse, er, ah, tour!

Sad, sad, sad, given the other opinions, with all his [many] faults, Uncle Ralph is probably the most quality candidate. Sad to say!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lester:  While Mister Nader is an American icon, I have personally lived your complaint. I may [in a solid, million plus margin, Democratic Party state] vote for &#8216;Naders&#8217; Raiders&#8217; yet again. But he is basically past &#8217;shelf date&#8217; [tho no more than Insane McCain!] and his staff drives off good hearted [and locally knowledgable] volunteers on a whole sale basis. Telling that most Naders Raiders do NOT sign up for a second round of abuse, er, ah, tour!</p>
<p>Sad, sad, sad, given the other opinions, with all his [many] faults, Uncle Ralph is probably the most quality candidate. Sad to say!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/07/08/kansas-secretary-of-state-accepts-reform-party-paperwork-for-president/comment-page-1/#comment-430124</link>
		<dc:creator>Trent Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 18:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3610#comment-430124</guid>
		<description>Citizen1,

Iv spoken with their chairman about affilliating, he seems to think its unwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Citizen1,</p>
<p>Iv spoken with their chairman about affilliating, he seems to think its unwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: citizen1</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/07/08/kansas-secretary-of-state-accepts-reform-party-paperwork-for-president/comment-page-1/#comment-430097</link>
		<dc:creator>citizen1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 16:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3610#comment-430097</guid>
		<description>The Kansas Reform Party should affiliate with the CP. As for changing its name that is up to the state laws if that is allowed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Kansas Reform Party should affiliate with the CP. As for changing its name that is up to the state laws if that is allowed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJ</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/07/08/kansas-secretary-of-state-accepts-reform-party-paperwork-for-president/comment-page-1/#comment-430093</link>
		<dc:creator>MJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 16:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3610#comment-430093</guid>
		<description>The Kansas Reform Party goes against the Reform Party principles that Ross Perot ran on when he founded the party.  This group of right wingers on the political fringe should not have the &#039;Reform&#039; name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Kansas Reform Party goes against the Reform Party principles that Ross Perot ran on when he founded the party.  This group of right wingers on the political fringe should not have the &#8216;Reform&#8217; name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lester Gabbard</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/07/08/kansas-secretary-of-state-accepts-reform-party-paperwork-for-president/comment-page-1/#comment-430091</link>
		<dc:creator>Lester Gabbard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 16:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3610#comment-430091</guid>
		<description>Reform Party has 2 ballot qualified state parties, if you exclude the nominal alliance with Independence Party of America.

Baldwin is a good match for Reform in Kansas.

It may prove to be same case for Independent Greens of Virginia. 

Depending on Green Party Convention results.

And the continued and repeated (2000, 2004, 2008)arrogance of the Ralph Nader team to the very people who have helped them get on the ballot in the past.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reform Party has 2 ballot qualified state parties, if you exclude the nominal alliance with Independence Party of America.</p>
<p>Baldwin is a good match for Reform in Kansas.</p>
<p>It may prove to be same case for Independent Greens of Virginia. </p>
<p>Depending on Green Party Convention results.</p>
<p>And the continued and repeated (2000, 2004, 2008)arrogance of the Ralph Nader team to the very people who have helped them get on the ballot in the past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald Raymond Lake</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/07/08/kansas-secretary-of-state-accepts-reform-party-paperwork-for-president/comment-page-1/#comment-429520</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald Raymond Lake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3610#comment-429520</guid>
		<description>Well Alex, with a half dozen ballot qualified state, the so called reform movement is not even a major minor component of P2008. 

I do not know what to tell you &#039;bout Kansas. Anti Evolution/ Pro Creationist but pro stem cell research, small government but Pro Agricultural price supports, Bible thumping but the only state in the so called union with out a minimum age on female marriage partners.

If Baldwin gets lots of votes in the Sunflower state, then it might insure another &#039;visit to the well&#039; for Kansas reformers in 2010 and 2012. Hmmmmmm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Alex, with a half dozen ballot qualified state, the so called reform movement is not even a major minor component of P2008. </p>
<p>I do not know what to tell you &#8217;bout Kansas. Anti Evolution/ Pro Creationist but pro stem cell research, small government but Pro Agricultural price supports, Bible thumping but the only state in the so called union with out a minimum age on female marriage partners.</p>
<p>If Baldwin gets lots of votes in the Sunflower state, then it might insure another &#8216;visit to the well&#8217; for Kansas reformers in 2010 and 2012. Hmmmmmm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/07/08/kansas-secretary-of-state-accepts-reform-party-paperwork-for-president/comment-page-1/#comment-429510</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3610#comment-429510</guid>
		<description>Good news for Baldwin/the CP, bad news for the RP if they decide to nominate their own Pres. candidate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good news for Baldwin/the CP, bad news for the RP if they decide to nominate their own Pres. candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
