<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maine Supreme Court Removes Herb Hoffman from Ballot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/07/28/maine-supreme-court-removes-herb-hoffman-from-ballot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/07/28/maine-supreme-court-removes-herb-hoffman-from-ballot/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:30:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=5976</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthur Torrey</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/07/28/maine-supreme-court-removes-herb-hoffman-from-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-448767</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur Torrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3735#comment-448767</guid>
		<description>Moral of story - Don&#039;t cut it so fine...  I don&#039;t know how many raw sigs were turned in, but I&#039;d doubt that there was anything close to the 50% margin I usually see suggested (and have had reccommended to me by Town Clerks when I&#039;ve been running)  If he&#039;d had a bigger margin, A: The loss of a few signatures wouldn&#039;t have mattered, and B: He probably wouldn&#039;t have been challenged in the first place...  

It was only the few signatures that made him a vulnerable target - if he&#039;d submitted say 5,000 valid sigs, then the opposition would probably have decided it would be a waste of effort to challenge...

BTW, sort of problem can hit the &quot;big guys&quot; as well - here in Mass. we just had the &quot;Party-annointed&quot; US Senate candidate fail to make his primary ballot by something like 60 signatures...  According to the FEC Jim Ogonowski spent something around $30K on &quot;campaign consultants&quot; and $2K on petitioning...  He has shut down his campaign, and his former long-shot competition will be the R candidate against Kerry...  IMHO this is a good thing for the LPMA, as it means more likely votes for OUR US Senate candidate (Robert Underwood), and improves our shot at getting the 3% plus needed to gain &quot;Major Party&quot; status...  (Though that is a mixed blessing - ballot access is FAR worse in Mass. for a small &quot;Major Party&quot; than it is for a &quot;Political Designation&quot; - petition requirements go up, and the universe of eligible signers shrinks about 50%)

ART
LPMA Operations Facilitator 
Speaking for myself</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moral of story &#8211; Don&#8217;t cut it so fine&#8230;  I don&#8217;t know how many raw sigs were turned in, but I&#8217;d doubt that there was anything close to the 50% margin I usually see suggested (and have had reccommended to me by Town Clerks when I&#8217;ve been running)  If he&#8217;d had a bigger margin, A: The loss of a few signatures wouldn&#8217;t have mattered, and B: He probably wouldn&#8217;t have been challenged in the first place&#8230;  </p>
<p>It was only the few signatures that made him a vulnerable target &#8211; if he&#8217;d submitted say 5,000 valid sigs, then the opposition would probably have decided it would be a waste of effort to challenge&#8230;</p>
<p>BTW, sort of problem can hit the &#8220;big guys&#8221; as well &#8211; here in Mass. we just had the &#8220;Party-annointed&#8221; US Senate candidate fail to make his primary ballot by something like 60 signatures&#8230;  According to the FEC Jim Ogonowski spent something around $30K on &#8220;campaign consultants&#8221; and $2K on petitioning&#8230;  He has shut down his campaign, and his former long-shot competition will be the R candidate against Kerry&#8230;  IMHO this is a good thing for the LPMA, as it means more likely votes for OUR US Senate candidate (Robert Underwood), and improves our shot at getting the 3% plus needed to gain &#8220;Major Party&#8221; status&#8230;  (Though that is a mixed blessing &#8211; ballot access is FAR worse in Mass. for a small &#8220;Major Party&#8221; than it is for a &#8220;Political Designation&#8221; &#8211; petition requirements go up, and the universe of eligible signers shrinks about 50%)</p>
<p>ART<br />
LPMA Operations Facilitator<br />
Speaking for myself</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glaivester</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/07/28/maine-supreme-court-removes-herb-hoffman-from-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-448754</link>
		<dc:creator>Glaivester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3735#comment-448754</guid>
		<description>Well, I am donating to the GOP campaign in Maine then, just to spite the Democrats (the ones who brought suit).

Herb Hoffman should start a write-in campaign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I am donating to the GOP campaign in Maine then, just to spite the Democrats (the ones who brought suit).</p>
<p>Herb Hoffman should start a write-in campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stine</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/07/28/maine-supreme-court-removes-herb-hoffman-from-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-448676</link>
		<dc:creator>Stine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3735#comment-448676</guid>
		<description>All I can say is:

American Democracy -- one more candidate than communism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I can say is:</p>
<p>American Democracy &#8212; one more candidate than communism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

