<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Op-Ed in Boston Globe on Barr&#8217;s Massachusetts Ballot Fight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/08/15/op-ed-in-boston-globe-on-barrs-massachusetts-ballot-fight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/08/15/op-ed-in-boston-globe-on-barrs-massachusetts-ballot-fight/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 11:51:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=646</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Magoon</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/08/15/op-ed-in-boston-globe-on-barrs-massachusetts-ballot-fight/comment-page-1/#comment-477050</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Magoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 04:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3800#comment-477050</guid>
		<description>So Clinton will be on the Ballot in Massachusetts? She did win the primary. Because if she isnâ€™t then on what basis is Massachusetts denying substitution? Seem like a point that should be made when this goes to court.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Clinton will be on the Ballot in Massachusetts? She did win the primary. Because if she isnâ€™t then on what basis is Massachusetts denying substitution? Seem like a point that should be made when this goes to court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

