Is this supposed to refer to Objectivists? From my experience, they’re the exact opposite of either “reactionary” (ie, politically pragmatism, unprincipled) or “oppressors” (ie, forcing someone to do something against his will).

“while using quotes from the ‘founding fathers’ to convince them that being stomped on equals freedom”

Again, if this is referring to Objectivists, you’ve failed again. They’re regularly cite the faults of the founding fathers. and oppose appeals to tradition or history. You should check out this article – I read it yesterday and it was quite informative:

http://www.theobjectivestandard.com/issues/2006-fall/decline-fall-american-conservatism.asp

“So now the Libertarians follow in the footsteps of the Socialists….splintering their few numbers into several different parties.”

Objectivists were never Libertarians. Rand was always vocally opposed to Libertarianism in practice. The LP is a collection of individuals with randomly-intersecting short-term interests, but contradictory long-term goals from all parts of the spectrum.

More here: http://www.aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/libertarians.html