<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ralph Nader&#8217;s Ballot Labels</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/08/25/ralph-naders-ballot-labels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/08/25/ralph-naders-ballot-labels/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 01:08:41 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: пyпcя</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/08/25/ralph-naders-ballot-labels/comment-page-1/#comment-738385</link>
		<dc:creator>пyпcя</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 23:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3839#comment-738385</guid>
		<description>Отлично! Все очень понятно и грамотно, и в то же время без излишних умствований и самолюбования, и на доступном языке. Редкий случай когда человек делится актуальной и полезной инфой. Спасибо автору!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Отлично! Все очень понятно и грамотно, и в то же время без излишних умствований и самолюбования, и на доступном языке. Редкий случай когда человек делится актуальной и полезной инфой. Спасибо автору!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: discouraged</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/08/25/ralph-naders-ballot-labels/comment-page-1/#comment-532062</link>
		<dc:creator>discouraged</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 18:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3839#comment-532062</guid>
		<description>You people urging us to vote Obama....have you really done the research on this guy?? I&#039;ve heard people say that they don&#039;t think that Palin is ready for the white house, but Obama is? That&#039;s BS. The man has logged 143 active days in the senate and has no accomplishments that he can speak of. He votes present on most issues instead of actually logging any sort of vote (you can look up the site that shows every single reps vote). And what about his links to known terrorists and the fact that his wife has publicly stated that she will &quot;use all of her resources to help the African American population&quot;? Do you really want a man that has a (reverse) racist wife in the white house? Or his ties to a church where their mission ON THEIR WEBSITE states that they are all about their &quot;commitment to Africa&quot; and how they are the &quot;chosen people&quot;, and a pastor that actively hates America? What about the fact that you never, EVER, hear him refer to his background as anything but black when he was raised in a white household? And the fact that he wants to vote yes on a global tax which would lessen this country&#039;s standing globally? The fact that he refuses to wear a flag, and just barely even has one visible on his jet or refuses to put his hand over his heart for the national anthem? Are you all just blown away by his pretty speeches or what? 

Seriously, I&#039;m not what anybody that knows me would call a racist and would have no problem with a black man in the white house, but this man is using his race as a platform, so those things must be considered. This man is not a patriot. 

Don&#039;t get me wrong, I am by no means a McCain/Palin supporter but I refuse to help put Obama in the white house either. The man has no idea how to deal with foreign issues and won&#039;t be able to stand up to any other countries. Putting him in charge will only make our country weak.

And yes, the McCain/Palin ticket has major issues as well, but there is nobody here actively pushing that vote.

Personally, I think this country is screwed more than it has ever been in the past. If there is another option to vote for when I go to the ballots, I will be voting for that option. Otherwise, maybe I&#039;ll just write in the name of someone that I think would be best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You people urging us to vote Obama&#8230;.have you really done the research on this guy?? I&#8217;ve heard people say that they don&#8217;t think that Palin is ready for the white house, but Obama is? That&#8217;s BS. The man has logged 143 active days in the senate and has no accomplishments that he can speak of. He votes present on most issues instead of actually logging any sort of vote (you can look up the site that shows every single reps vote). And what about his links to known terrorists and the fact that his wife has publicly stated that she will &#8220;use all of her resources to help the African American population&#8221;? Do you really want a man that has a (reverse) racist wife in the white house? Or his ties to a church where their mission ON THEIR WEBSITE states that they are all about their &#8220;commitment to Africa&#8221; and how they are the &#8220;chosen people&#8221;, and a pastor that actively hates America? What about the fact that you never, EVER, hear him refer to his background as anything but black when he was raised in a white household? And the fact that he wants to vote yes on a global tax which would lessen this country&#8217;s standing globally? The fact that he refuses to wear a flag, and just barely even has one visible on his jet or refuses to put his hand over his heart for the national anthem? Are you all just blown away by his pretty speeches or what? </p>
<p>Seriously, I&#8217;m not what anybody that knows me would call a racist and would have no problem with a black man in the white house, but this man is using his race as a platform, so those things must be considered. This man is not a patriot. </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I am by no means a McCain/Palin supporter but I refuse to help put Obama in the white house either. The man has no idea how to deal with foreign issues and won&#8217;t be able to stand up to any other countries. Putting him in charge will only make our country weak.</p>
<p>And yes, the McCain/Palin ticket has major issues as well, but there is nobody here actively pushing that vote.</p>
<p>Personally, I think this country is screwed more than it has ever been in the past. If there is another option to vote for when I go to the ballots, I will be voting for that option. Otherwise, maybe I&#8217;ll just write in the name of someone that I think would be best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john in mo</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/08/25/ralph-naders-ballot-labels/comment-page-1/#comment-526649</link>
		<dc:creator>john in mo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 18:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3839#comment-526649</guid>
		<description>Despite Ralph&#039;s great contributions to consumer protection, his legacy will be for only one thing: He personally gave us George W. Bush - that is an unchallengable fact. Don&#039;t let it happen to us again. We cannot afford 4 more years - literally, we can&#039;t afford more tax cuts for the wealthy and national policy set by the oil industry. A vote for Ralph is a vote for McCain. Nothing more need be said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite Ralph&#8217;s great contributions to consumer protection, his legacy will be for only one thing: He personally gave us George W. Bush &#8211; that is an unchallengable fact. Don&#8217;t let it happen to us again. We cannot afford 4 more years &#8211; literally, we can&#8217;t afford more tax cuts for the wealthy and national policy set by the oil industry. A vote for Ralph is a vote for McCain. Nothing more need be said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Blue</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/08/25/ralph-naders-ballot-labels/comment-page-1/#comment-524290</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Blue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 21:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3839#comment-524290</guid>
		<description>It depends on which state you&#039;re in.  In California, New York, and Illinois, for example, a vote for Nader does no harm because it won&#039;t alter the outcome of the election.  But in the handful of states where the race will be decided --  Colorado, Florida, New Hampshire, Nevada, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Wisconsin, and 1 or 2 more -- a vote for Nader may result in McCain&#039;s election.  If you&#039;re in a battleground state and are thinking about voting for Nader, please remember what happened in Florida in 2000.  Every vote counts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It depends on which state you&#8217;re in.  In California, New York, and Illinois, for example, a vote for Nader does no harm because it won&#8217;t alter the outcome of the election.  But in the handful of states where the race will be decided &#8212;  Colorado, Florida, New Hampshire, Nevada, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Wisconsin, and 1 or 2 more &#8212; a vote for Nader may result in McCain&#8217;s election.  If you&#8217;re in a battleground state and are thinking about voting for Nader, please remember what happened in Florida in 2000.  Every vote counts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Dog</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/08/25/ralph-naders-ballot-labels/comment-page-1/#comment-523111</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 18:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3839#comment-523111</guid>
		<description>I just want to thank Nader and all of his supporters for all of their work getting Republican presidents elected in 2000, 2004 and 2008.  

Nader:  Come clean about how much hard right wing support you are getting to serve as a tool of Bush, Cheney and McCain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just want to thank Nader and all of his supporters for all of their work getting Republican presidents elected in 2000, 2004 and 2008.  </p>
<p>Nader:  Come clean about how much hard right wing support you are getting to serve as a tool of Bush, Cheney and McCain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/08/25/ralph-naders-ballot-labels/comment-page-1/#comment-521353</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 18:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3839#comment-521353</guid>
		<description>I voted for Nader in 2000 in the state of Ohio. I appreciate where many of you are coming from; the two party system has become adept at providing candidates that are difficult to embrace. But I must urge you to please VOTE FOR OBAMA. If those of us who had voted for Nader in 2000 had gone with Gore (for whom I have no great love), we could have avoided many of the past eight years&#039; disasters. No war in Iraq. No Abu Graib. No Guantanamo. No doubling of the national debt. We could have handled September 11th with the dignity and courage that makes our country great, not the fear and greed that motivate the Republicans. BE SURE THAT A VOTE FOR NADER PUTS MCCAIN CLOSER TO THE PRESIDENCY. While you may not love Obama, there are stark differences between him and McCain regarding our economy, the war in Iraq, and other important issues. Please, think about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I voted for Nader in 2000 in the state of Ohio. I appreciate where many of you are coming from; the two party system has become adept at providing candidates that are difficult to embrace. But I must urge you to please VOTE FOR OBAMA. If those of us who had voted for Nader in 2000 had gone with Gore (for whom I have no great love), we could have avoided many of the past eight years&#8217; disasters. No war in Iraq. No Abu Graib. No Guantanamo. No doubling of the national debt. We could have handled September 11th with the dignity and courage that makes our country great, not the fear and greed that motivate the Republicans. BE SURE THAT A VOTE FOR NADER PUTS MCCAIN CLOSER TO THE PRESIDENCY. While you may not love Obama, there are stark differences between him and McCain regarding our economy, the war in Iraq, and other important issues. Please, think about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carpenter</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/08/25/ralph-naders-ballot-labels/comment-page-1/#comment-505473</link>
		<dc:creator>Carpenter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 03:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3839#comment-505473</guid>
		<description>If anyone wants to work together to help Nader/ Gonzalez contact me. I&#039;m in New York.  I&#039;m already trying to work with his official votenader.org people but I want to do independent things.  Especially New Yorkers....my email is ceo@iancarpenter.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anyone wants to work together to help Nader/ Gonzalez contact me. I&#8217;m in New York.  I&#8217;m already trying to work with his official votenader.org people but I want to do independent things.  Especially New Yorkers&#8230;.my email is <a href="mailto:ceo@iancarpenter.com">ceo@iancarpenter.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/08/25/ralph-naders-ballot-labels/comment-page-1/#comment-500829</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 10:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3839#comment-500829</guid>
		<description>Rosemary,

I said that because I believe that - as was the case in 2000 - Mr. Nader is much more likely to take votes from the more liberal Democratic Party candidate than from McCain. Hence, McCain would more directly benefit from a strong Nader showing.


Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rosemary,</p>
<p>I said that because I believe that &#8211; as was the case in 2000 &#8211; Mr. Nader is much more likely to take votes from the more liberal Democratic Party candidate than from McCain. Hence, McCain would more directly benefit from a strong Nader showing.</p>
<p>Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rosemary</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/08/25/ralph-naders-ballot-labels/comment-page-1/#comment-499296</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosemary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 06:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3839#comment-499296</guid>
		<description>Paul,

I can&#039;t imagine why the GOP would give Party money to Nader&#039;s campaign.  Although many Republican MEMBERS likely are. They are not real happy with McCain and are looking at alternatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul,</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t imagine why the GOP would give Party money to Nader&#8217;s campaign.  Although many Republican MEMBERS likely are. They are not real happy with McCain and are looking at alternatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rosemary</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/08/25/ralph-naders-ballot-labels/comment-page-1/#comment-499290</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosemary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 05:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=3839#comment-499290</guid>
		<description>Brent: &quot;I say keep it going until we get fifty!!!! whats five more states?????&quot;

No, Brent. Every state has different filing requirements. Signature filing dates are past now. Some state requirements have become impossibly difficult unless you can afford to field a huge number of trained volunteers. Nader&#039;s team did an excellent job of choosing which ones had to be left out without jeopardizing getting other states finished on time.

I like Nader&#039;s effort to give other almost unknown 3rd parties a &quot;leg up&quot; for future ballot access for candidates for lesser offices by running this time himself in 11 states under a variety of different party banners.  Nader is looking to the future possibilities of more choices available to voters and more chances for younger people to get their feet wet running for office in down-ballot races.

I&#039;ve been &quot;listening in&quot; on discussions among some Libertarian retired attorneys who seem very knowledgeable about ballot access rules in the various states.  I&#039;ve learned a lot I did not know before.  I had noticed that the Libertarian Party seemed to always hold on to its ballot lines, election after election, even when it wasn&#039;t clear that they were winning much, if any, of the down-ballot races. Now I know how they do it.  Again, the rules are different (but not onerous) from state to state.

Anyway, back to Ralph, I am so glad he found a two-step way to get listed on my state&#039;s ballot. I had about given up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brent: &#8220;I say keep it going until we get fifty!!!! whats five more states?????&#8221;</p>
<p>No, Brent. Every state has different filing requirements. Signature filing dates are past now. Some state requirements have become impossibly difficult unless you can afford to field a huge number of trained volunteers. Nader&#8217;s team did an excellent job of choosing which ones had to be left out without jeopardizing getting other states finished on time.</p>
<p>I like Nader&#8217;s effort to give other almost unknown 3rd parties a &#8220;leg up&#8221; for future ballot access for candidates for lesser offices by running this time himself in 11 states under a variety of different party banners.  Nader is looking to the future possibilities of more choices available to voters and more chances for younger people to get their feet wet running for office in down-ballot races.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been &#8220;listening in&#8221; on discussions among some Libertarian retired attorneys who seem very knowledgeable about ballot access rules in the various states.  I&#8217;ve learned a lot I did not know before.  I had noticed that the Libertarian Party seemed to always hold on to its ballot lines, election after election, even when it wasn&#8217;t clear that they were winning much, if any, of the down-ballot races. Now I know how they do it.  Again, the rules are different (but not onerous) from state to state.</p>
<p>Anyway, back to Ralph, I am so glad he found a two-step way to get listed on my state&#8217;s ballot. I had about given up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
