Comments on: Lyndon LaRouche Movement Doesn’t Like Any Presidential Candidates

By: Joe Thomas

Joe Thomas — Mon, 15 Sep 2008 16:47:18 +0000

Lyndon Larouche sucks. Everyone knows he is just a conman who is in the bag for the Clintons ever since they got him out of Prison in 1994. He would never support a great american like Ralph Nader for President. Go to http://www.votenader.org or call 1-202-471-5833 to contact the Nader campaign by phone.

By: Richard Shepard

Richard Shepard — Mon, 15 Sep 2008 13:58:16 +0000

Saneboomer,

For another view of Lincoln, check this link –> http://www.lneilsmith.org/abelenin.html

If read what I said, you will note that I am not taking sides on Lincoln, merely observing that a different person could, and probably would, had done things differently, and perhaps without the loss of over 600,000 lives.

By: Gerald Pechenuk

Gerald Pechenuk — Mon, 15 Sep 2008 05:56:46 +0000

Richard,
The marathon meetings to come up with a solution to the global financial crisis held in New York, September 12-24, might be more honestly called a “zombie jamboree.” The so-called economic recovery of the last 20 years of Sir Alan Greenspan, which produced a “securities machine,” i.e. a constant never ending scheme of one bubble after and on top of the next to produce an alleged income stream which could then be secutized, leveraged, traded, and re-traded, and re-re-traded, and then re-re-re-traded, HAS PROVEN TO BE A TOTAL SUCCESS; they got away with it cause you guys failed to listen to Larouche and act on his solutions, when you could have, MANY MOONS AGO!!! They were just as successful as Napoleon was in his invasion of Russia!!!!
I can hear Felix, the Fixer Rohatyn now, turning to his Marshalls at Lehman Brothers now, echoing Napoleon’s famous words to Marshall Ney, “Marshall, WHERE ARE THE TROOPS?”
If you can answer that question for Felix, you can figure out how Lyndon LaRouche, despite all the bubba meisters and bullshit, and just plain malicious slander spread against him, by THE MOST POWERFUL FINANCIAL FORCES IN THE WORLD, has been proven to be right and all of his opponents, WAY OFF BASE!!!!
Care to argue about it? Be my guest… Gerald Pechenuk, cities12345@yahoo.com

By: Phil Sawyer

Phil Sawyer — Mon, 15 Sep 2008 01:21:43 +0000

Richard Shepard Says:
September 14th, 2008 at 8:43 am
Richard,

Abraham Lincoln presided over the most radical redefinition and reconstruction of American government in its entire history. We can argue whether he was the cause or one merely caught up in the times, but the question remains whether a more experienced politician would have led us to a different, and less destructive, result.

Phil Sawyer responds:

You are correct, Mr. Shepard. As evil as slavery was, war was not the answer. It hardly ever is.

By: SaneBoomer

SaneBoomer — Sun, 14 Sep 2008 21:27:19 +0000

Oh, and to Richard, global disaster is NOT inevitable, IT’S HERE. Wake up, and smell the dead bodies! Boomers don’t like bad news, so they just say “It’s not happening”.

If you read LaRouche’s material, you would never say he’s saying what everyone has said, and, forget the guillotines, the French Revolution sucked! We need people to use their MINDS!

LaRouche has solutions to the crisis, which, we, the citizens must fight for.

By: SaneBoomer

SaneBoomer — Sun, 14 Sep 2008 21:21:22 +0000

Abe Lincoln was possibly the greatest president in the history of our nation; he presided over the defeat of the Confederacy, a British creation, the end of legal slavery in the U.S., and the greatest industrial revolution the world had ever seen… the Civil War would not have been necessary had it not been for the slave-loving South, but had Lincoln allowed the secession of S.Carolina, and then more states, the U.S. would have been finished as a constitutional republic and the Brutish Vampire would have prevailed!

By: Mr. Anon

Mr. Anon — Sun, 14 Sep 2008 16:56:17 +0000

I thought Michael Bloomberg was supposed to be on one of the tickets, eh?

By: Richard Shepard

Richard Shepard — Sun, 14 Sep 2008 16:43:41 +0000

Richard,

By: Howard Gibson

Howard Gibson — Sun, 14 Sep 2008 15:40:02 +0000

If Lyndon is right and we have a real crash of the economy, and neither of the candidates, or even minor candidates want to talk about it, then they are totally useless. Anyone for a military coup?

By: Richard

Richard — Sun, 14 Sep 2008 14:56:11 +0000

As far as Obama’s experience, Abraham Lincoln had also only served one term in Congress, plus some years in the Illinois legislature.