<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New York Times Article is Titled &#8220;Nader, Drawing Votes &#8211; from McCain&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/09/23/new-york-times-article-is-titled-nader-drawing-votes-from-mccain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/09/23/new-york-times-article-is-titled-nader-drawing-votes-from-mccain/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 11:51:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=7876</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jake</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/09/23/new-york-times-article-is-titled-nader-drawing-votes-from-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-523232</link>
		<dc:creator>jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 20:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4020#comment-523232</guid>
		<description>With Gonzalez&#039;s hispanic roots I would not be suprised to see him speak in New Mexico and Arizona heading into the election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Gonzalez&#8217;s hispanic roots I would not be suprised to see him speak in New Mexico and Arizona heading into the election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Gaines</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/09/23/new-york-times-article-is-titled-nader-drawing-votes-from-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-523105</link>
		<dc:creator>David Gaines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4020#comment-523105</guid>
		<description>I believe early on they said that Matt Gonzalez would be focusing on speaking along the west coast. He maintains a law practice in San Francisco and I&#039;m not sure he&#039;s even able to campaign fulltime, as was the situation with Winona LaDuke eight years ago. Someone correct me on this if I&#039;m wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe early on they said that Matt Gonzalez would be focusing on speaking along the west coast. He maintains a law practice in San Francisco and I&#8217;m not sure he&#8217;s even able to campaign fulltime, as was the situation with Winona LaDuke eight years ago. Someone correct me on this if I&#8217;m wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jake</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/09/23/new-york-times-article-is-titled-nader-drawing-votes-from-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-523099</link>
		<dc:creator>jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4020#comment-523099</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have the exact numbers, but Nader is polling very well in Ohio according to their team. You would also think California would be a state where Nader will rally a lot of votes. Since his campaign really started he has toured the state three times. 

It seems an opposite of past years; Nader is polling worst in the Northeast and better in the Midwest. His worst statistical area though is the south. 

Does anybody know, mostly directed to you Richard, when Matt Gonzalez will be doing some touring by himself? I know he has done some engagements with Ralph, but it would make sense to send him to some states. I have heard him speak a few times online and he seems to be very good at bashing Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have the exact numbers, but Nader is polling very well in Ohio according to their team. You would also think California would be a state where Nader will rally a lot of votes. Since his campaign really started he has toured the state three times. </p>
<p>It seems an opposite of past years; Nader is polling worst in the Northeast and better in the Midwest. His worst statistical area though is the south. </p>
<p>Does anybody know, mostly directed to you Richard, when Matt Gonzalez will be doing some touring by himself? I know he has done some engagements with Ralph, but it would make sense to send him to some states. I have heard him speak a few times online and he seems to be very good at bashing Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/09/23/new-york-times-article-is-titled-nader-drawing-votes-from-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-523092</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4020#comment-523092</guid>
		<description>No, he wasn&#039;t pleased.

In 2004 he was only on the ballot before 50.1% of the voters.  He hated having been removed from the ballot in so many states in 2004.  And one reason for his attitude was that being removed from the ballot in so many states artifically reduced his national vote total so badly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, he wasn&#8217;t pleased.</p>
<p>In 2004 he was only on the ballot before 50.1% of the voters.  He hated having been removed from the ballot in so many states in 2004.  And one reason for his attitude was that being removed from the ballot in so many states artifically reduced his national vote total so badly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Drucker</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/09/23/new-york-times-article-is-titled-nader-drawing-votes-from-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-523091</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Drucker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4020#comment-523091</guid>
		<description>In this election year I always thought the pollsters were missing the third-party/independent vote. Last night a CNN pollster proved my point.

In FL the poll showed Obama &amp; McCain at 46% and 8% Undecided. But when the voters were given a bigger choice the vote was:

Obama - 48%
McCain - 45%
Nader - 4%
Barr - 1%
McKinney - 1%
Undecided - 1%

First it seems McCain is the loser this year to the Third-Party/Independent Candidates in FL. Second the voters are not as Undecided as some think. But I still can not explain why Obama gained.

Some other states - Registered Voters:

COLORADO
Obama - 42% 
McCain - 43%
Barr - 3%
McKinney - 2%
Nader - 7%
Undecided - 3%

NEVADA 
Obama - 41% 
McCain - 41% 
Barr - 5%
McKinney - 3%
Nader - 6% 
Undecided - 4%

NEW MEXICO 
Obama - 50%
McCain - 36%
Nader - 8%
Undecided - 6% 

PENNSYLVANIA
Obama - 47%
McCain - 38%
Barr - 1%
Nader - 7%
Undecided - 7%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this election year I always thought the pollsters were missing the third-party/independent vote. Last night a CNN pollster proved my point.</p>
<p>In FL the poll showed Obama &amp; McCain at 46% and 8% Undecided. But when the voters were given a bigger choice the vote was:</p>
<p>Obama &#8211; 48%<br />
McCain &#8211; 45%<br />
Nader &#8211; 4%<br />
Barr &#8211; 1%<br />
McKinney &#8211; 1%<br />
Undecided &#8211; 1%</p>
<p>First it seems McCain is the loser this year to the Third-Party/Independent Candidates in FL. Second the voters are not as Undecided as some think. But I still can not explain why Obama gained.</p>
<p>Some other states &#8211; Registered Voters:</p>
<p>COLORADO<br />
Obama &#8211; 42%<br />
McCain &#8211; 43%<br />
Barr &#8211; 3%<br />
McKinney &#8211; 2%<br />
Nader &#8211; 7%<br />
Undecided &#8211; 3%</p>
<p>NEVADA<br />
Obama &#8211; 41%<br />
McCain &#8211; 41%<br />
Barr &#8211; 5%<br />
McKinney &#8211; 3%<br />
Nader &#8211; 6%<br />
Undecided &#8211; 4%</p>
<p>NEW MEXICO<br />
Obama &#8211; 50%<br />
McCain &#8211; 36%<br />
Nader &#8211; 8%<br />
Undecided &#8211; 6% </p>
<p>PENNSYLVANIA<br />
Obama &#8211; 47%<br />
McCain &#8211; 38%<br />
Barr &#8211; 1%<br />
Nader &#8211; 7%<br />
Undecided &#8211; 7%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Church Ortiz</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/09/23/new-york-times-article-is-titled-nader-drawing-votes-from-mccain/comment-page-1/#comment-523088</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Church Ortiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4020#comment-523088</guid>
		<description>I think Nader would have been quite pleased with one-third of the vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Nader would have been quite pleased with one-third of the vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

