<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: U.S. Supreme Court Asks Louisiana To Respond to Barr Appeal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/09/29/us-supreme-court-asks-louisiana-to-respond-to-barr-appeal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/09/29/us-supreme-court-asks-louisiana-to-respond-to-barr-appeal/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 11:51:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=8003</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bicagifsHokcralgeJer</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/09/29/us-supreme-court-asks-louisiana-to-respond-to-barr-appeal/comment-page-1/#comment-610334</link>
		<dc:creator>bicagifsHokcralgeJer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 02:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4054#comment-610334</guid>
		<description>wbypqxiiyclppjtmwell, hi admin adn people nice forum indeed. how&#039;s life? hope it&#039;s introduce branch ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wbypqxiiyclppjtmwell, hi admin adn people nice forum indeed. how&#8217;s life? hope it&#8217;s introduce branch ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ralph a. applegate</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/09/29/us-supreme-court-asks-louisiana-to-respond-to-barr-appeal/comment-page-1/#comment-528478</link>
		<dc:creator>ralph a. applegate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 05:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4054#comment-528478</guid>
		<description>Who is Ken Moellman?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who is Ken Moellman?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ralph a. applegate</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/09/29/us-supreme-court-asks-louisiana-to-respond-to-barr-appeal/comment-page-1/#comment-528477</link>
		<dc:creator>ralph a. applegate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 05:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4054#comment-528477</guid>
		<description>How will those Louisiana voters, who are not yet registered , and have not voted , be able to vote for their Congressmen, on Nov. 4, since their primary is Oct. 4, 2008, compare this with Ohio case &quot; Ohio v. Brunner &quot;, does this mean that Louisiana&#039;s unregistered voters have been disenfranchised? As Brunner claimed these Ohio voters, probably mostly homeless people, who truly do not have an address? Can a homeless person claim his address is the &#039; homeless shelter&quot;, and is this Brunner&#039;s way of heisting the Republican&#039;s, just like Blackwell, a Republican Sec. of State , did in 2004. Is this turnabout is fair play  while Brunner damages these legitimately registered individuals. Today, I observed maybe 10 individuals using the computers at the Franklin Co. ,Ohio , Bd. of Elections, which were previously used by candidate/ checkers to check these voters credibility who registered today, with computers which contain erroneous data, and incomplete data, so how can these voters be verified correctly, this way?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How will those Louisiana voters, who are not yet registered , and have not voted , be able to vote for their Congressmen, on Nov. 4, since their primary is Oct. 4, 2008, compare this with Ohio case &#8221; Ohio v. Brunner &#8220;, does this mean that Louisiana&#8217;s unregistered voters have been disenfranchised? As Brunner claimed these Ohio voters, probably mostly homeless people, who truly do not have an address? Can a homeless person claim his address is the &#8216; homeless shelter&#8221;, and is this Brunner&#8217;s way of heisting the Republican&#8217;s, just like Blackwell, a Republican Sec. of State , did in 2004. Is this turnabout is fair play  while Brunner damages these legitimately registered individuals. Today, I observed maybe 10 individuals using the computers at the Franklin Co. ,Ohio , Bd. of Elections, which were previously used by candidate/ checkers to check these voters credibility who registered today, with computers which contain erroneous data, and incomplete data, so how can these voters be verified correctly, this way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Moellman</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/09/29/us-supreme-court-asks-louisiana-to-respond-to-barr-appeal/comment-page-1/#comment-528398</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Moellman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 01:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4054#comment-528398</guid>
		<description>Does this mean that Barr&#039;s status in the tracker is &quot;in court&quot; again?

Good luck, LPLA! I hope you guys win!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this mean that Barr&#8217;s status in the tracker is &#8220;in court&#8221; again?</p>
<p>Good luck, LPLA! I hope you guys win!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

