<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Connecticut Libertarians Find Enough Valid Signatures for Barr Ballot Access</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/06/connecticut-libertarians-believe-they-have-found-enough-valid-signatures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/06/connecticut-libertarians-believe-they-have-found-enough-valid-signatures/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 23:30:42 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Morrison</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/06/connecticut-libertarians-believe-they-have-found-enough-valid-signatures/comment-page-1/#comment-535038</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Morrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 18:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4092#comment-535038</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t it funny how strict governments can be when it comes to finding excuses to keep Libertarian and other new-party candidates off the ballot, and how tolerant they are when it comes to the old parties&#039; not meeting those election regulations?
Well, maybe not funny after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it funny how strict governments can be when it comes to finding excuses to keep Libertarian and other new-party candidates off the ballot, and how tolerant they are when it comes to the old parties&#8217; not meeting those election regulations?<br />
Well, maybe not funny after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/06/connecticut-libertarians-believe-they-have-found-enough-valid-signatures/comment-page-1/#comment-535027</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4092#comment-535027</guid>
		<description>Even if they end up making it on the ballot,  keep in mind that if the job would have been done better in the first place this wouldn&#039;t be an issue right now.  

Also,  keep in mind that the LP ballot access failures in West Virginia,  Maine,  Washington DC,  and Louisiana were also due to mismanagement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if they end up making it on the ballot,  keep in mind that if the job would have been done better in the first place this wouldn&#8217;t be an issue right now.  </p>
<p>Also,  keep in mind that the LP ballot access failures in West Virginia,  Maine,  Washington DC,  and Louisiana were also due to mismanagement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Gillis</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/06/connecticut-libertarians-believe-they-have-found-enough-valid-signatures/comment-page-1/#comment-535022</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Gillis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4092#comment-535022</guid>
		<description>Is there anyone likely to contest these newly found sigs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there anyone likely to contest these newly found sigs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coming back to the LP</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/06/connecticut-libertarians-believe-they-have-found-enough-valid-signatures/comment-page-1/#comment-535000</link>
		<dc:creator>Coming back to the LP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 15:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4092#comment-535000</guid>
		<description>This is great news!

The LP should make it on the CT ballot.  The Sec of State should just relent and put Barr on the ballot.  If not, the judge surely will now, given that there are enough proven sigs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great news!</p>
<p>The LP should make it on the CT ballot.  The Sec of State should just relent and put Barr on the ballot.  If not, the judge surely will now, given that there are enough proven sigs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/06/connecticut-libertarians-believe-they-have-found-enough-valid-signatures/comment-page-1/#comment-534901</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4092#comment-534901</guid>
		<description>Thank G-d . Now we have to hope that Connecticut does the right thing and allows Barr on the ballot this late in the game. Please email that states officials to do the right thing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank G-d . Now we have to hope that Connecticut does the right thing and allows Barr on the ballot this late in the game. Please email that states officials to do the right thing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
