<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kentucky Court of Appeals Removes Libertarian Congressional Candidate from Ballot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/09/kentucky-court-of-appeals-removes-libertarian-congressional-candidate-from-ballot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/09/kentucky-court-of-appeals-removes-libertarian-congressional-candidate-from-ballot/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:15:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=7206</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Moellman</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/09/kentucky-court-of-appeals-removes-libertarian-congressional-candidate-from-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-542265</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Moellman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4108#comment-542265</guid>
		<description>Based on what I understand (and I&#039;m no lawyer), because of the way this case went down, based on the laws used to kick our candidate off the ballot, we cannot appeal any further in Kentucky courts.

Federal is the next step.  Wheels are turning.

Meanwhile, we&#039;re going to get him on as a write-in as well, and challenge the signs that the court demanded be posted that say not to vote for Ed, since Ed will be a legal write-in candidate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on what I understand (and I&#8217;m no lawyer), because of the way this case went down, based on the laws used to kick our candidate off the ballot, we cannot appeal any further in Kentucky courts.</p>
<p>Federal is the next step.  Wheels are turning.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, we&#8217;re going to get him on as a write-in as well, and challenge the signs that the court demanded be posted that say not to vote for Ed, since Ed will be a legal write-in candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry West</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/09/kentucky-court-of-appeals-removes-libertarian-congressional-candidate-from-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-537337</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4108#comment-537337</guid>
		<description>FWIW, The Kentucky Supreme Court consists of six Democrats and one Republican. It is an elected position, so we need to remember who is for increased democracy and who is against when they come up for reelection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWIW, The Kentucky Supreme Court consists of six Democrats and one Republican. It is an elected position, so we need to remember who is for increased democracy and who is against when they come up for reelection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

