<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vermont Green Party Loses Ballot Access Case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/20/vermont-green-party-loses-ballot-access-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/20/vermont-green-party-loses-ballot-access-case/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:30:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=6801</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rationality and Science Education</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/20/vermont-green-party-loses-ballot-access-case/comment-page-1/#comment-549925</link>
		<dc:creator>Rationality and Science Education</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 06:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4161#comment-549925</guid>
		<description>In California, the biggest Green monthly ran [same sized] photos of Nader, Camejo [RIP], Cobb and LaMarche. A P2004 political train wreck. West Coast organization and structure is still a shadow of pre 2004. First hand information from Don Lake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In California, the biggest Green monthly ran [same sized] photos of Nader, Camejo [RIP], Cobb and LaMarche. A P2004 political train wreck. West Coast organization and structure is still a shadow of pre 2004. First hand information from Don Lake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/20/vermont-green-party-loses-ballot-access-case/comment-page-1/#comment-549622</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4161#comment-549622</guid>
		<description>Cobb got a fair number of write-ins in 2004:  1,014 in Texas, 192 in Ohio, 108 in North Carolina, 104 in Virginia, and lesser amounts in certain other states.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cobb got a fair number of write-ins in 2004:  1,014 in Texas, 192 in Ohio, 108 in North Carolina, 104 in Virginia, and lesser amounts in certain other states.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anticobb</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/20/vermont-green-party-loses-ballot-access-case/comment-page-1/#comment-549400</link>
		<dc:creator>anticobb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4161#comment-549400</guid>
		<description>Yeah, and like maybe 4, 5 people bothered to write in David Cobb? The guy was an absolute disaster for the Green Party and they have yet, if ever to recover from that huckster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, and like maybe 4, 5 people bothered to write in David Cobb? The guy was an absolute disaster for the Green Party and they have yet, if ever to recover from that huckster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rrlemur</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/20/vermont-green-party-loses-ballot-access-case/comment-page-1/#comment-549393</link>
		<dc:creator>rrlemur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4161#comment-549393</guid>
		<description>This is too bad.  Markowitz has been open to electoral system reform in the past which is more inclusive to 3rd parties.  I&#039;d have thought she&#039;d be better with ballot access (and at least counting!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is too bad.  Markowitz has been open to electoral system reform in the past which is more inclusive to 3rd parties.  I&#8217;d have thought she&#8217;d be better with ballot access (and at least counting!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rationality and Science Education</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/20/vermont-green-party-loses-ballot-access-case/comment-page-1/#comment-549002</link>
		<dc:creator>Rationality and Science Education</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 04:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4161#comment-549002</guid>
		<description>Per the Nader /Camejo stumbling, bumbling mess in California in P2004:  Document the candidate&#039;s federal electors ----or else!  Do it from scratch, do not assume that the ballot access electors majically, automatically transfer to write in efforts.....

Boy, Uncle Ralph sure learns from his past. As the 2004 initial Southern California go to guy, and, with John Coffey, the reason his write ins got counted after the ballot access bust, I would say that his 46 state effort this year is better than all the other movements combined!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Per the Nader /Camejo stumbling, bumbling mess in California in P2004:  Document the candidate&#8217;s federal electors &#8212;-or else!  Do it from scratch, do not assume that the ballot access electors majically, automatically transfer to write in efforts&#8230;..</p>
<p>Boy, Uncle Ralph sure learns from his past. As the 2004 initial Southern California go to guy, and, with John Coffey, the reason his write ins got counted after the ballot access bust, I would say that his 46 state effort this year is better than all the other movements combined!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

