<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: C-SPAN Will Cover Nader-Baldwin Debate Live</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/22/c-span-will-cover-nader-baldwin-debate-live/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/22/c-span-will-cover-nader-baldwin-debate-live/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:30:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1925</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulie</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/22/c-span-will-cover-nader-baldwin-debate-live/comment-page-1/#comment-551147</link>
		<dc:creator>paulie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4173#comment-551147</guid>
		<description>So here are some things I am wondering about

1) Ken Moellman claims more debates are in the works. Does anyone have any info on this? I would especially appreciate something which can be verified with the campaigns.

2) â€œNotABarrFanâ€ says Baldwin/CP has been having problems and might pull out. Anyone from the Baldwin campaign/CP care to confirm or deny?

Posted at IPR (link above) also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So here are some things I am wondering about</p>
<p>1) Ken Moellman claims more debates are in the works. Does anyone have any info on this? I would especially appreciate something which can be verified with the campaigns.</p>
<p>2) â€œNotABarrFanâ€ says Baldwin/CP has been having problems and might pull out. Anyone from the Baldwin campaign/CP care to confirm or deny?</p>
<p>Posted at IPR (link above) also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NotABarrFan</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/22/c-span-will-cover-nader-baldwin-debate-live/comment-page-1/#comment-551146</link>
		<dc:creator>NotABarrFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4173#comment-551146</guid>
		<description>Thank you Paulie -- It is now working -- and get this $50 per person.

They really need to limit this because I am sure the demand will be very very high. I can see so many people wanting to buy tickets at $100 a pair now. No wonder the sitw was down. This will be comparable to a Ron Paul money bomb for sure. Hope they have free drinks like reason did for this price!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Paulie &#8212; It is now working &#8212; and get this $50 per person.</p>
<p>They really need to limit this because I am sure the demand will be very very high. I can see so many people wanting to buy tickets at $100 a pair now. No wonder the sitw was down. This will be comparable to a Ron Paul money bomb for sure. Hope they have free drinks like reason did for this price!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/22/c-span-will-cover-nader-baldwin-debate-live/comment-page-1/#comment-551145</link>
		<dc:creator>A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4173#comment-551145</guid>
		<description>I asked the Barr and McKinney campaigns weeks ago if they were attending the original and got no response.  

Only Nader and Baldwin responded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I asked the Barr and McKinney campaigns weeks ago if they were attending the original and got no response.  </p>
<p>Only Nader and Baldwin responded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulie</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/22/c-span-will-cover-nader-baldwin-debate-live/comment-page-1/#comment-551143</link>
		<dc:creator>paulie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4173#comment-551143</guid>
		<description>http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/10/cynthia-mckinney-and-bob-barr-react-to-tonights-free-and-equal-debate-between-ralph-nader-and-chuck-baldwin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/10/cynthia-mckinney-and-bob-barr-react-to-tonights-free-and-equal-debate-between-ralph-nader-and-chuck-baldwin" rel="nofollow">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/10/cynthia-mckinney-and-bob-barr-react-to-tonights-free-and-equal-debate-between-ralph-nader-and-chuck-baldwin</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NotABarrFan</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/22/c-span-will-cover-nader-baldwin-debate-live/comment-page-1/#comment-551140</link>
		<dc:creator>NotABarrFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4173#comment-551140</guid>
		<description>Get this, I just heard from other CP/Baldwin folks, looks like they are getting the short shaft too! I called the campaign and they are considering my suggesting of bowing out because this is obviously a set up by the Nader folks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get this, I just heard from other CP/Baldwin folks, looks like they are getting the short shaft too! I called the campaign and they are considering my suggesting of bowing out because this is obviously a set up by the Nader folks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NotABarrFan</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/22/c-span-will-cover-nader-baldwin-debate-live/comment-page-1/#comment-551132</link>
		<dc:creator>NotABarrFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4173#comment-551132</guid>
		<description>I called to reserve 4 seats in the debate today and was told, I am sorry -- you need to &quot;BUY A TICKET ONLINE&quot; and that &quot;ONLY TWO MAY COME&quot; -- however when I tried to purchase a ticket the web page link looks like it is broken and no where on the web page does it say how much this ticket is. Wasn&#039;t the reason counter debate free? Why did they only announce today that this costs money? Is so many people interested that they really have to limit tickets? Forget this crap -- I guess I will watch on line (just to see how many people show up and PAY for this stupid poorly plan debacle of a debate).

Oh wait, perhaps because I am a Baldwin supporter is why they are trying to limit and charge me. I should call back, say I am a Nader raider, and see how many I can bring for free!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I called to reserve 4 seats in the debate today and was told, I am sorry &#8212; you need to &#8220;BUY A TICKET ONLINE&#8221; and that &#8220;ONLY TWO MAY COME&#8221; &#8212; however when I tried to purchase a ticket the web page link looks like it is broken and no where on the web page does it say how much this ticket is. Wasn&#8217;t the reason counter debate free? Why did they only announce today that this costs money? Is so many people interested that they really have to limit tickets? Forget this crap &#8212; I guess I will watch on line (just to see how many people show up and PAY for this stupid poorly plan debacle of a debate).</p>
<p>Oh wait, perhaps because I am a Baldwin supporter is why they are trying to limit and charge me. I should call back, say I am a Nader raider, and see how many I can bring for free!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Moellman</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/22/c-span-will-cover-nader-baldwin-debate-live/comment-page-1/#comment-551125</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Moellman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4173#comment-551125</guid>
		<description>I have heard that there may be another debate scheduled soon, and that if it happens, Barr will be in attendance.

For those who don&#039;t think the candidates have anything better to do; I know for a fact that the Barr campaign has been very busy. They just made another swing through Ohio last night, stopping at the University of Cincinnati.  We also tried to get him into Northern Kentucky while he was nearby, but unfortunately our venue was canceled on us (not the campaign&#039;s fault).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have heard that there may be another debate scheduled soon, and that if it happens, Barr will be in attendance.</p>
<p>For those who don&#8217;t think the candidates have anything better to do; I know for a fact that the Barr campaign has been very busy. They just made another swing through Ohio last night, stopping at the University of Cincinnati.  We also tried to get him into Northern Kentucky while he was nearby, but unfortunately our venue was canceled on us (not the campaign&#8217;s fault).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/22/c-span-will-cover-nader-baldwin-debate-live/comment-page-1/#comment-551000</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4173#comment-551000</guid>
		<description>This is a link you can send all you know especially people not associated with The Third parties on tonight&#039;s debate. This is th elast chance at getting voted from ther Duopoly.:
http://www.nolanchart.com/article5274.html

And here is the link to why I am no longer supporting Bob Barr already read by 172 people in just one hour:
http://www.nolanchart.com/article5275.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a link you can send all you know especially people not associated with The Third parties on tonight&#8217;s debate. This is th elast chance at getting voted from ther Duopoly.:<br />
<a href="http://www.nolanchart.com/article5274.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nolanchart.com/article5274.html</a></p>
<p>And here is the link to why I am no longer supporting Bob Barr already read by 172 people in just one hour:<br />
<a href="http://www.nolanchart.com/article5275.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nolanchart.com/article5275.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ACUTS</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/22/c-span-will-cover-nader-baldwin-debate-live/comment-page-1/#comment-550977</link>
		<dc:creator>ACUTS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4173#comment-550977</guid>
		<description>Yes Cynthia and Bob could not find the time in there oh so busy schedule...



you have to be kidding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Cynthia and Bob could not find the time in there oh so busy schedule&#8230;</p>
<p>you have to be kidding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glaivester</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/22/c-span-will-cover-nader-baldwin-debate-live/comment-page-1/#comment-550650</link>
		<dc:creator>Glaivester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 04:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4173#comment-550650</guid>
		<description>Considering how little notice the candidates had for this,  I am not going to blame Bob Barr for not showing up at this.

On the other hand, considering that he snubbed Ron Paul a month or so ago and held a competing conference (indicating that he had no scheduling conflict), I can see why so many people do not trust him.

Nonetheless, I think that it would be a good idea for Libertarians who do not wish to support Baldwin to vote Barr anyway, because they can help the LP get access on more ballots next time if they do, which is the big goal right now.

Really, there should be a more coordinated attempt to set up debates for 2012.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering how little notice the candidates had for this,  I am not going to blame Bob Barr for not showing up at this.</p>
<p>On the other hand, considering that he snubbed Ron Paul a month or so ago and held a competing conference (indicating that he had no scheduling conflict), I can see why so many people do not trust him.</p>
<p>Nonetheless, I think that it would be a good idea for Libertarians who do not wish to support Baldwin to vote Barr anyway, because they can help the LP get access on more ballots next time if they do, which is the big goal right now.</p>
<p>Really, there should be a more coordinated attempt to set up debates for 2012.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

