<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Libertarian, Constitution Parties are Only Nationally-Organized Parties with More Legislative Nominees in 2008 than in 2006</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/24/libertarian-constitution-parties-are-only-nationally-organized-parties-with-more-legislative-nominees-in-2008-than-in-2006/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/24/libertarian-constitution-parties-are-only-nationally-organized-parties-with-more-legislative-nominees-in-2008-than-in-2006/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:43:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=9173</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/24/libertarian-constitution-parties-are-only-nationally-organized-parties-with-more-legislative-nominees-in-2008-than-in-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-553551</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 18:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4192#comment-553551</guid>
		<description>So the Connecticut for Lieberman party candidates are all opponents of Joe Lieberman? That must be confusing. One would think that voters who dislike Lieberman would reject any candidates with the &quot;Connecticut for Lieberman&quot; label.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the Connecticut for Lieberman party candidates are all opponents of Joe Lieberman? That must be confusing. One would think that voters who dislike Lieberman would reject any candidates with the &#8220;Connecticut for Lieberman&#8221; label.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/24/libertarian-constitution-parties-are-only-nationally-organized-parties-with-more-legislative-nominees-in-2008-than-in-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-552141</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 22:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4192#comment-552141</guid>
		<description>That Green Party webpage is very good and very useful, but it lists some Greens who wanted to run this year, but didn&#039;t get on the November ballot for a variety of reasons.  One Arizona Green didn&#039;t get enough write-in votes in the Green Party primary.  5 Illinois Greens apparently didn&#039;t get nominated properly by party meeting after the primary, or else they didn&#039;t get on the Green Party primary ballot.  One Connecticut candidate&#039;s general election petition failed.  Some Maine Greens apparently didn&#039;t get themselves on the Green Party primary ballot.  One Ohio candidate didn&#039;t get on for some reason.  One South Carolina Green was kept off by a Democratic Party challenge.  One Washington state Green was wiped out by &quot;top-two&quot;.  One West Virginia Mountain Party candidate didn&#039;t end up on the ballot for some reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Green Party webpage is very good and very useful, but it lists some Greens who wanted to run this year, but didn&#8217;t get on the November ballot for a variety of reasons.  One Arizona Green didn&#8217;t get enough write-in votes in the Green Party primary.  5 Illinois Greens apparently didn&#8217;t get nominated properly by party meeting after the primary, or else they didn&#8217;t get on the Green Party primary ballot.  One Connecticut candidate&#8217;s general election petition failed.  Some Maine Greens apparently didn&#8217;t get themselves on the Green Party primary ballot.  One Ohio candidate didn&#8217;t get on for some reason.  One South Carolina Green was kept off by a Democratic Party challenge.  One Washington state Green was wiped out by &#8220;top-two&#8221;.  One West Virginia Mountain Party candidate didn&#8217;t end up on the ballot for some reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e b bortz</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/24/libertarian-constitution-parties-are-only-nationally-organized-parties-with-more-legislative-nominees-in-2008-than-in-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-552049</link>
		<dc:creator>e b bortz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 20:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4192#comment-552049</guid>
		<description>On the gp.org elections menu, there are 3 groups
of &quot;equivalent&quot; state legislature offices:

State Representative
State House of Representative
General Assembly

Using these 3 groups of candidates, there are 
approximately 57 Green Party candidates for these
offices from what I can tell.  That seems to surpass the number the Green Party had for these
offices in 2006.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the gp.org elections menu, there are 3 groups<br />
of &#8220;equivalent&#8221; state legislature offices:</p>
<p>State Representative<br />
State House of Representative<br />
General Assembly</p>
<p>Using these 3 groups of candidates, there are<br />
approximately 57 Green Party candidates for these<br />
offices from what I can tell.  That seems to surpass the number the Green Party had for these<br />
offices in 2006.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

