<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 6th Circuit Strikes Down Ban on Out-of-State Circulators in Ohio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/29/6th-circuit-strikes-down-ban-on-out-of-state-circulators-in-ohio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/29/6th-circuit-strikes-down-ban-on-out-of-state-circulators-in-ohio/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 06:50:36 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/29/6th-circuit-strikes-down-ban-on-out-of-state-circulators-in-ohio/comment-page-1/#comment-558347</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 18:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4219#comment-558347</guid>
		<description>&quot;jimbo Says: 
October 30th, 2008 at 2:05 pm 
I think out speech should not be limited to just in state residents. However I think there should be some type of background checks because they are dealing with people’s information.&quot;

There is no need for this because one can&#039;t really do anything with the information given on a petition.  It is just a name and an address.  Most people&#039;s names and addresses can be found in a phone book,  and everyone who is registered to vote can be found on the voter registration lists which are public information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;jimbo Says:<br />
October 30th, 2008 at 2:05 pm<br />
I think out speech should not be limited to just in state residents. However I think there should be some type of background checks because they are dealing with people’s information.&#8221;</p>
<p>There is no need for this because one can&#8217;t really do anything with the information given on a petition.  It is just a name and an address.  Most people&#8217;s names and addresses can be found in a phone book,  and everyone who is registered to vote can be found on the voter registration lists which are public information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimbo</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/29/6th-circuit-strikes-down-ban-on-out-of-state-circulators-in-ohio/comment-page-1/#comment-557543</link>
		<dc:creator>jimbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 22:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4219#comment-557543</guid>
		<description>I think out speech should not be  limited to just in state residents. However I think there should be some type of background checks because they are dealing with people&#039;s information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think out speech should not be  limited to just in state residents. However I think there should be some type of background checks because they are dealing with people&#8217;s information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ETJB</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/29/6th-circuit-strikes-down-ban-on-out-of-state-circulators-in-ohio/comment-page-1/#comment-556656</link>
		<dc:creator>ETJB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 06:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4219#comment-556656</guid>
		<description>My idea;

A political party shall be entitled to have its qualified candidates included on the election ballot, with the applicable party name,  
if a thousand qualified voters register as a member of the party, the party submits a petition signed by a thousand qualified voters, or at the last preceding general election for a partisan office that is voted on by the qualified voters of the entire State the party received, at least, the sixth highest percentage of the popular vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My idea;</p>
<p>A political party shall be entitled to have its qualified candidates included on the election ballot, with the applicable party name,<br />
if a thousand qualified voters register as a member of the party, the party submits a petition signed by a thousand qualified voters, or at the last preceding general election for a partisan office that is voted on by the qualified voters of the entire State the party received, at least, the sixth highest percentage of the popular vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/29/6th-circuit-strikes-down-ban-on-out-of-state-circulators-in-ohio/comment-page-1/#comment-556116</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4219#comment-556116</guid>
		<description>Whooohooo!  A victory for our side!  

In addition to being unconstitutional,  out-of-state petition circulator bans make ballot access more difficult than it would be otherwise.  More difficult ballot access means less choices for the people and more power for the establisment.  All out-of-state petition circulator bans should be thrown out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whooohooo!  A victory for our side!  </p>
<p>In addition to being unconstitutional,  out-of-state petition circulator bans make ballot access more difficult than it would be otherwise.  More difficult ballot access means less choices for the people and more power for the establisment.  All out-of-state petition circulator bans should be thrown out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
