<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nader-Barr-Baldwin Debate Set for October 30 in Cleveland</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/29/nader-barr-baldwin-debate-set-for-october-30-in-cleveland/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/29/nader-barr-baldwin-debate-set-for-october-30-in-cleveland/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 11:51:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=9483</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GA</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/29/nader-barr-baldwin-debate-set-for-october-30-in-cleveland/comment-page-1/#comment-557658</link>
		<dc:creator>GA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 01:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4220#comment-557658</guid>
		<description>Skeffington, who is the viper tongue allegedly apreading lies on the internet? This comment was a bit too obscure for my comprehension.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skeffington, who is the viper tongue allegedly apreading lies on the internet? This comment was a bit too obscure for my comprehension.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RM</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/29/nader-barr-baldwin-debate-set-for-october-30-in-cleveland/comment-page-1/#comment-557590</link>
		<dc:creator>RM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 23:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4220#comment-557590</guid>
		<description>Skeffington, actually it was not Nader&#039;s debate.  The Barr Campaign reached out to our camp through Baldwin then went to Nader who tried to bring in Tobin-the-Liar.  Zimmer was a proposed venue but a school activity ruled it out so they considered Ohio State but then Nader could not make that so they shifted to Cleveland after the City Club made the offer.  McKinney&#039;s commitments are understandable and her refusal to participate in Tobin/Nader&#039;s debate on the 19th is as well due to the sliminess of the organizer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skeffington, actually it was not Nader&#8217;s debate.  The Barr Campaign reached out to our camp through Baldwin then went to Nader who tried to bring in Tobin-the-Liar.  Zimmer was a proposed venue but a school activity ruled it out so they considered Ohio State but then Nader could not make that so they shifted to Cleveland after the City Club made the offer.  McKinney&#8217;s commitments are understandable and her refusal to participate in Tobin/Nader&#8217;s debate on the 19th is as well due to the sliminess of the organizer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skeffington</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/29/nader-barr-baldwin-debate-set-for-october-30-in-cleveland/comment-page-1/#comment-557555</link>
		<dc:creator>Skeffington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 22:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4220#comment-557555</guid>
		<description>This is not any different from the October 19th debate that was supposed to happen at Columbia University. We ended with two debates, one virtual at breakthematrix and another one at Columbia University which was cancelled. Only Cynthia McKinney attended the other debate because that is the one that her schedule allowed her to attend.  This time around, the initial debate was supposed to happen at the University of Cincinnati Zimmer at 8:30pm between Bob Barr and Pastor Baldwin. Cynthia McKinney couldn&#039;t attend because she was scheduled to be in Houston to stand against Death Penalty and support the family of the citizen who will be executed today.  I don&#039;t think that Texas would reschedule the execution to facilitate the debate. The debate at UC-Zimmer has been canceled and now both Barr and Baldwin are in Cleveland Ohio for Nader&#039;s debate. Until today, most people thought that the debate was going to be held at UC-Zimmer at 8:30 pm.  Meanwhile the viper tongue is behaving like Satanâ€™s only daughter spreading lies on the internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not any different from the October 19th debate that was supposed to happen at Columbia University. We ended with two debates, one virtual at breakthematrix and another one at Columbia University which was cancelled. Only Cynthia McKinney attended the other debate because that is the one that her schedule allowed her to attend.  This time around, the initial debate was supposed to happen at the University of Cincinnati Zimmer at 8:30pm between Bob Barr and Pastor Baldwin. Cynthia McKinney couldn&#8217;t attend because she was scheduled to be in Houston to stand against Death Penalty and support the family of the citizen who will be executed today.  I don&#8217;t think that Texas would reschedule the execution to facilitate the debate. The debate at UC-Zimmer has been canceled and now both Barr and Baldwin are in Cleveland Ohio for Nader&#8217;s debate. Until today, most people thought that the debate was going to be held at UC-Zimmer at 8:30 pm.  Meanwhile the viper tongue is behaving like Satanâ€™s only daughter spreading lies on the internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Marston</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/29/nader-barr-baldwin-debate-set-for-october-30-in-cleveland/comment-page-1/#comment-557495</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Marston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 20:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4220#comment-557495</guid>
		<description>Does anyone have the webstream working right now ? 4:23 PM EDT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone have the webstream working right now ? 4:23 PM EDT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulie</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/29/nader-barr-baldwin-debate-set-for-october-30-in-cleveland/comment-page-1/#comment-557491</link>
		<dc:creator>paulie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 20:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4220#comment-557491</guid>
		<description>Do what you want. It&#039;s not even close to being run by Nader or Nader supporters, and it&#039;s the #1 in traffic site on independent/alternative parties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do what you want. It&#8217;s not even close to being run by Nader or Nader supporters, and it&#8217;s the #1 in traffic site on independent/alternative parties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RM</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/29/nader-barr-baldwin-debate-set-for-october-30-in-cleveland/comment-page-1/#comment-557486</link>
		<dc:creator>RM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 19:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4220#comment-557486</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s odd.  Why would we bother making a case on a site that simply republished an unsubstantiated rumor posted as a comment on another Web site?  Not much credibility there.  Is that site also run by Nader through another person just like Tobin&#039;s group?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s odd.  Why would we bother making a case on a site that simply republished an unsubstantiated rumor posted as a comment on another Web site?  Not much credibility there.  Is that site also run by Nader through another person just like Tobin&#8217;s group?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulie</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/29/nader-barr-baldwin-debate-set-for-october-30-in-cleveland/comment-page-1/#comment-557480</link>
		<dc:creator>paulie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 19:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4220#comment-557480</guid>
		<description>Both sides can make their case at 

http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/10/rumor-mill-is-cynthia-mckinney-endorsing-obama/

A note on the title: Greens have denied any such endorsement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both sides can make their case at </p>
<p><a href="http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/10/rumor-mill-is-cynthia-mckinney-endorsing-obama/" rel="nofollow">http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2008/10/rumor-mill-is-cynthia-mckinney-endorsing-obama/</a></p>
<p>A note on the title: Greens have denied any such endorsement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RM</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/29/nader-barr-baldwin-debate-set-for-october-30-in-cleveland/comment-page-1/#comment-557478</link>
		<dc:creator>RM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 19:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4220#comment-557478</guid>
		<description>Scott, is 100% correct regarding the first debate organized by Tobin/Nader.  

The lack of professionalism by this young woman seeps through when she slanders candidates who don&#039;t bow down at her request.  It&#039;s all part of the Nader team&#039;s scheme to look like third-party movement leaders on stage but working to destroy it behind the scenes.

Christina Tobin cannot be trusted to organize a bake sale.  The same goes for most of Nader&#039;s team.

They are attempting to create discontent with McKinney, Barr and Baldwin while wearing a halo.  I hear McCain&#039;s team is learning from their tactics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, is 100% correct regarding the first debate organized by Tobin/Nader.  </p>
<p>The lack of professionalism by this young woman seeps through when she slanders candidates who don&#8217;t bow down at her request.  It&#8217;s all part of the Nader team&#8217;s scheme to look like third-party movement leaders on stage but working to destroy it behind the scenes.</p>
<p>Christina Tobin cannot be trusted to organize a bake sale.  The same goes for most of Nader&#8217;s team.</p>
<p>They are attempting to create discontent with McKinney, Barr and Baldwin while wearing a halo.  I hear McCain&#8217;s team is learning from their tactics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Gillis</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/29/nader-barr-baldwin-debate-set-for-october-30-in-cleveland/comment-page-1/#comment-557472</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Gillis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4220#comment-557472</guid>
		<description>Having just watched this C-SPAN video, I came away with one thought:

Cynthia McKinney refused to criticize Obama. At all. She wouldnâ€™t even mention his name or repudiate callers who told her that she should support him or wrongly stated that she and he are on the same page politically.

Seems like she just refused to swing when someone tossed her a softball and just changed the subject.

The best she does is talk generally about the Democratic party not representing her, but she lets statements about how Obama being progressive or similar to her go totally unanswered.

She has a real opportunity to expose Obama and his pitiful record and doesnâ€™t take it. She could have mentioned his vote for the PATRIOT Act, FISA, his support of the death penalty, his support of Blackwater and willingness to continue the occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan and explore the possibility of preemptive strikes on Pakistan and Iran.

Thatâ€™s pretty inexcusable. Why wonâ€™t she go after Obamaâ€™s record?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having just watched this C-SPAN video, I came away with one thought:</p>
<p>Cynthia McKinney refused to criticize Obama. At all. She wouldnâ€™t even mention his name or repudiate callers who told her that she should support him or wrongly stated that she and he are on the same page politically.</p>
<p>Seems like she just refused to swing when someone tossed her a softball and just changed the subject.</p>
<p>The best she does is talk generally about the Democratic party not representing her, but she lets statements about how Obama being progressive or similar to her go totally unanswered.</p>
<p>She has a real opportunity to expose Obama and his pitiful record and doesnâ€™t take it. She could have mentioned his vote for the PATRIOT Act, FISA, his support of the death penalty, his support of Blackwater and willingness to continue the occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan and explore the possibility of preemptive strikes on Pakistan and Iran.</p>
<p>Thatâ€™s pretty inexcusable. Why wonâ€™t she go after Obamaâ€™s record?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/10/29/nader-barr-baldwin-debate-set-for-october-30-in-cleveland/comment-page-1/#comment-557471</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4220#comment-557471</guid>
		<description>Who is the  moderator?  Hopefully, he will learn from Chris Hedges how NOT to moderate a debate (e.g., reading lengthy soliloquies and bloviating at the expense of the candidates&#039; speaking time).  He obviously thought himself more important than the &quot;peons&quot; on stage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who is the  moderator?  Hopefully, he will learn from Chris Hedges how NOT to moderate a debate (e.g., reading lengthy soliloquies and bloviating at the expense of the candidates&#8217; speaking time).  He obviously thought himself more important than the &#8220;peons&#8221; on stage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

