I know if these “vicious rumors” were being published and pursued about and against me, and I had nothing to hide in a court of law I would have sued for libel the day these suits were presented.

Instead the DNC and Obama have decided to file injunctions and attempt to have these suits tossed on technicalities to avoid having to prove the unprovable which would ultimately lead to the absolute destruction of the Democratic Party and the “Hope” of changing the course of this country forever.

WOW Mark sure seems impressed with himself such and important title so far I am not impressed.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

PHILIP J. BERG, ON HIS OWN BEHALF
AND ON BEHALF OF THE GOVERNMENT
OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Relator,

v.

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA,

Defendant.

COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL FALSE CLAIMS ACT

COMES NOW Philip J. Berg, as the relator on his own behalf and on behalf of the Government of United States of America, and brings this complaint pursuant to the federal False Claims Act, 31 USC 3729, et sequitur, against the defendant Barack Hussein Obama, stating:
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1. This cause of action arises under the federal False Claims Act found at 31 USC 3729 through 3733. Jurisdiction thus resides, pursuant to that federal statute, with the United States District Courts. This particular District Court for the District of Columbia affords the proper venue for this action in that the defendant has submitted within the District of Columbia his false, fraudulent, and wrongful claim for the payment of monies by the United States Government and the Department of the Treasury located also within the District of Columbia.
THE PARTIES
2. The relator, Philip J. Berg, is a citizen of the United States, a resident of Pennsylvania, more than eighteen years of age, and a lawyer practicing law in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. He uniquely possesses certain information not held by others regarding the false claim by the defendant by virtue of his long history of activity within the Democratic Party and by virtue of his discovery of disturbing information as to the defendant.
3. The United States Supreme Court has held in Vermont v. United States, 529 US 765 (2000) that a private citizen such as the relator herein has standing to bring an action under the False Claims Act as this. Thus, there can be no valid assertion whatsoever that the relator does not have standing to bring this instant action. The United States Supreme Court has expressly held otherwise.
4. The United States Government is the party on whose behalf the relator also brings this action, as well as on his own behalf, as required by the False Claims Act.
5. The defendant, Barack Hussein Obama (hereinafter Obama), is not a citizen of the United States but is nevertheless a United States Senator from the State of Illinois, elected to that office, improperly in November 2004, as will be seen more fully, infra.
FACTS
6. Article I, Section 3 of the United States Constitution mandates that a United States Senator shall be a citizen of the United States.
7. Defendant Obama is not a citizen of the United States, as indicated by the information contained on Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof.
8. Defendant Obama, knowing he was and is not a United States citizen, nevertheless fraudulently filed papers for the purpose of running for the federal office of United States Senator. As a result, he was elected to that office, despite his inability to qualify for that office as required by the United States Constitution.
9. Upon his wrongful election, defendant has received payment from the United States Government, specifically from the United States Department of the Treasury, of a salary as a United States Senator. This payment of a salary to defendant Obama results from his submission of a false claim, within the full meaning of the False Claims Act, that he is a United States citizen entitled to a salary as a United States Senator. He is not, as he cannot legally hold this federal office by virtue of his not being a United States citizen.
10. This ruse by defendant Obama that he is a United States citizen and thus entitled to the payment of a salary for the performance of duties while in the Office of United States Senator constitutes a clear violation of the 31 USC 3729, et sequitur, for which there is a certain mandatory remedy.
REMEDY
11. Relator Berg, on his own behalf and on behalf of the United States Government, seeks all remedies available to him pursuant to the remedies set forth in the False Claims Act, including a refund of all salary monies paid to the defendant and other certain fiscal penalties set forth in the False Claims Act.
12. Further, relator prays that the United States Attorney General avail himself of all investigative tools on an expedited basis as provided under 31 USC 3733 in order that this matter might be resolved expeditiously. More specifically, the Attorney General can and should, as quickly as possible, secure the original birth certificate of the defendant purportedly held by the State of Hawaii, but which defendant Obama refuses to provide to the public.
WHEREFORE, pursuant to the procedures and remedies set forth in the federal False Claims Act, relator, on his own behalf and on behalf of the Government of the United States of America demands that the Act be enforced fully, fairly, and expeditiously.

________________________________
PHILIP J. BERG, Relator
555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12
Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531
(610) 825-3134

Both McCain and Oboma are dirty colonials and simply not elligable to be qualified.

The Congress has behaved badly these last 8 years and blamed Bush for it (even though they told him to break the laws): they will continue to violate our rights and break their own laws.

Happy Guy Fawkes Day: Never, ever forget –Voting is over.

And by a Republican governor, at that. God, she must really hate McCain, huh? -lol- Ah, conspiracy theorists — they Just Can Not Accept Reality…. }}:)

Yup, irrelevant it is, & was, always. -chuckle- Of course, the assumption that that’s why he went to HI is only that, & we all know what they’re worth. -grin-

“The person making the “claim” is Berg. Therefore by virtue of what you yourself just posted, the burden of proof is on him. :)”

Sorry Bill, you didn’t understand me, I was talking about Obama’s claim, nor Berg’s”

No, Mark, I understood you fine. };) You see, the problem is, Obama hasn’t made a claim, in court or anywhere else. Berg, OTOH, has. And as we all know, only claims made in court are affected by rulings on legal claims. I understood you fine, & underastood your point. The only problems were that your point was improperly phrased & that the way you phrased it, it applied to Berg & only Berg. ;)