Comments on: Obama Sweeps Early NH Towns, Ron Paul Gets Write-Ins http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/11/03/obama-sweeps-early-nh-towns-ron-paul-gets-write-ins/ Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:30:10 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=784 By: Glaivester http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/11/03/obama-sweeps-early-nh-towns-ron-paul-gets-write-ins/comment-page-1/#comment-562845 Glaivester Wed, 05 Nov 2008 02:14:24 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4255#comment-562845 Lex, the USA Today thing is okay, but they only list the top four in each state. That's better than some, but I'd like to see the top six. Lex, the USA Today thing is okay, but they only list the top four in each state. That’s better than some, but I’d like to see the top six.

]]> By: Lex http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/11/03/obama-sweeps-early-nh-towns-ron-paul-gets-write-ins/comment-page-1/#comment-562760 Lex Wed, 05 Nov 2008 01:01:32 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4255#comment-562760 USAToday.com is showing the third-party results by state, if you select the individual state results and scroll down. I will be boycotting CNN.com and using USAToday.com this time around. CBSNews.com has a handy popular vote summary on their main presidential results page, but don't bother going to the individual state results. USAToday.com is showing the third-party results by state, if you select the individual state results and scroll down. I will be boycotting CNN.com and using USAToday.com this time around.

CBSNews.com has a handy popular vote summary on their main presidential results page, but don’t bother going to the individual state results.

]]> By: Lex http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/11/03/obama-sweeps-early-nh-towns-ron-paul-gets-write-ins/comment-page-1/#comment-562757 Lex Wed, 05 Nov 2008 00:50:33 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4255#comment-562757 Are there any good news sites that are actually tracking the votes for all of the candidates? CNN.com is pretending there are only two, and leaving everyone else out. USAToday.com shows a combined third party line called "Others". CBSNews.com has a few third party candidates listed in their national summary, but not state-by-state. The first time I looked at the CBSNews.com results, they showed 40,000+ votes and 4% of the total going to Ted Stevens of the Objectivist Party. I don't know if it was a hack or a joke or what, but it quickly disappeared. Are there any good news sites that are actually tracking the votes for all of the candidates? CNN.com is pretending there are only two, and leaving everyone else out. USAToday.com shows a combined third party line called “Others”. CBSNews.com has a few third party candidates listed in their national summary, but not state-by-state.

The first time I looked at the CBSNews.com results, they showed 40,000+ votes and 4% of the total going to Ted Stevens of the Objectivist Party. I don’t know if it was a hack or a joke or what, but it quickly disappeared.

]]> By: Andrew http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/11/03/obama-sweeps-early-nh-towns-ron-paul-gets-write-ins/comment-page-1/#comment-562694 Andrew Tue, 04 Nov 2008 23:46:43 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4255#comment-562694 So this is presumably the Chicken Little thread? Nice link entdinglichung. Have God Help Us and Jonathan something they'd like to share with us having read the last paragraph? It'd sure enliven the evening! So this is presumably the Chicken Little thread?

Nice link entdinglichung. Have God Help Us and Jonathan something they’d like to share with us having read the last paragraph? It’d sure enliven the evening!

]]> By: Entdinglichung http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/11/03/obama-sweeps-early-nh-towns-ron-paul-gets-write-ins/comment-page-1/#comment-562240 Entdinglichung Tue, 04 Nov 2008 13:39:59 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4255#comment-562240 @GOD HELP US: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Paranoid_Style_in_American_Politics @GOD HELP US:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Paranoid_Style_in_American_Politics

]]> By: Jonathan http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/11/03/obama-sweeps-early-nh-towns-ron-paul-gets-write-ins/comment-page-1/#comment-562231 Jonathan Tue, 04 Nov 2008 13:07:17 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4255#comment-562231 Obama will win by a lanslide every country every people deserve the leaders they have the end is near. It looks like the Mayans were right about December 21,2012. Obama will win by a lanslide

every country every people deserve the leaders they have

the end is near. It looks like the Mayans were right about December 21,2012.

]]> By: GOD HELP US http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/11/03/obama-sweeps-early-nh-towns-ron-paul-gets-write-ins/comment-page-1/#comment-562209 GOD HELP US Tue, 04 Nov 2008 12:09:43 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4255#comment-562209 What are these idiots THINKING? From Obama's Berlin Speech: "We cannot to continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we have set. We have got to have a civilian national security force that is just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded." He added, "People of all ages, stations, and skills will be asked to serve." In my opinion, Obama's "civilian national security force" will be used to enforce speech codes, the "FAIRNESS DOCTRINE" and DRACONIAN ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS, right here on our own soil in violation of POSSE COMITATAS. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=69601 This man Obama is a truly scary demagogue who deserves to be questioned much more than he was. It is sad that our press is corrupt in this country and no longer can be trusted to do this job satisfactorily. It doesn't mean you should not investigate these things for yourself. It does not mean Obama did not say this. It's recorded on video everywhere for posterity. But the fact his apologists would twist it to mean something it does not in order to whitewash it is QUITE FRIGHTENING. What are these idiots THINKING?

From Obama’s Berlin Speech: “We cannot to continue to rely only on our military
in order to achieve the national security objectives that we have set. We have
got to have a civilian national security force that is just as powerful, just as
strong, just as well funded.” He added, “People of all ages, stations, and
skills will be asked to serve.”

In my opinion, Obama’s “civilian national security force” will be used to
enforce speech codes, the “FAIRNESS DOCTRINE” and DRACONIAN ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS,
right here on our own soil in violation of POSSE COMITATAS.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=69601

This man Obama is a truly scary demagogue who deserves to be questioned much
more than he was. It is sad that our press is corrupt in this country and no
longer can be trusted to do this job satisfactorily. It doesn’t mean you should
not investigate these things for yourself. It does not mean Obama did not say
this. It’s recorded on video everywhere for posterity.

But the fact his apologists would twist it to mean something it does not in
order to whitewash it is QUITE FRIGHTENING.

]]>