<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fox News Has Best Returns for Minor Party, Independent Presidential Candidates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/11/04/fox-news-has-best-returns-for-minor-party-independent-presidential-candidates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/11/04/fox-news-has-best-returns-for-minor-party-independent-presidential-candidates/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:15:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=9074</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/11/04/fox-news-has-best-returns-for-minor-party-independent-presidential-candidates/comment-page-1/#comment-565060</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 02:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4259#comment-565060</guid>
		<description>Google actually had some third parties (Nader and Barr) listed prominently on their election coverage/results page, it was even updated live as the votes were counted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google actually had some third parties (Nader and Barr) listed prominently on their election coverage/results page, it was even updated live as the votes were counted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/11/04/fox-news-has-best-returns-for-minor-party-independent-presidential-candidates/comment-page-1/#comment-563242</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 12:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4259#comment-563242</guid>
		<description>Nader is third - somewhere around 650,000 - they had hoped for a million but the fact those on the left got squeezed should surprise none.

Just done a quick check and its VERY late so I could be wrong but I believe where both were on the ballot he beat Barr in every state except Arizona and South Carolina.  He beat both Libertarians combined vote in New Hampshire.  He beat McKinney everywhere but Louisiana (presumably due to her work in New Orleans).

It might be noted that Nader was beaten by Ron Paul in both states where they were both on the ballot.  Paul polled 0.5 in Louisiana and 2.1% in Montana.

Outside of Paul the best votes were Nader&#039;s 1.4% in Maine and the Constituton Party&#039;s 1.3% in Utah (a bright spot in an otherwise poor result for them).

The squeeze on the left was very predictable - that on the right was perhaps less so but proved just as efficient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nader is third &#8211; somewhere around 650,000 &#8211; they had hoped for a million but the fact those on the left got squeezed should surprise none.</p>
<p>Just done a quick check and its VERY late so I could be wrong but I believe where both were on the ballot he beat Barr in every state except Arizona and South Carolina.  He beat both Libertarians combined vote in New Hampshire.  He beat McKinney everywhere but Louisiana (presumably due to her work in New Orleans).</p>
<p>It might be noted that Nader was beaten by Ron Paul in both states where they were both on the ballot.  Paul polled 0.5 in Louisiana and 2.1% in Montana.</p>
<p>Outside of Paul the best votes were Nader&#8217;s 1.4% in Maine and the Constituton Party&#8217;s 1.3% in Utah (a bright spot in an otherwise poor result for them).</p>
<p>The squeeze on the left was very predictable &#8211; that on the right was perhaps less so but proved just as efficient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hdf</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/11/04/fox-news-has-best-returns-for-minor-party-independent-presidential-candidates/comment-page-1/#comment-563010</link>
		<dc:creator>hdf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 06:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4259#comment-563010</guid>
		<description>An LP candidate in Texas just broke 1,000,000 votes:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://team1.sos.state.tx.us/enr/results/nov04_141_race39.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://team1.sos.state.tx.us/enr/results/nov04_141_race39.htm&lt;/a&gt;

Should be some kind of record for the LP?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An LP candidate in Texas just broke 1,000,000 votes:</p>
<p><a href="http://team1.sos.state.tx.us/enr/results/nov04_141_race39.htm" rel="nofollow">http://team1.sos.state.tx.us/enr/results/nov04_141_race39.htm</a></p>
<p>Should be some kind of record for the LP?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NE</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/11/04/fox-news-has-best-returns-for-minor-party-independent-presidential-candidates/comment-page-1/#comment-562953</link>
		<dc:creator>NE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 04:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4259#comment-562953</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott West</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/11/04/fox-news-has-best-returns-for-minor-party-independent-presidential-candidates/comment-page-1/#comment-562948</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 04:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4259#comment-562948</guid>
		<description>The best breakdown for minor parties and Nader is being done by AP.  C-SPAN has it here:
http://preview.tinyurl.com/6hgur3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best breakdown for minor parties and Nader is being done by AP.  C-SPAN has it here:<br />
<a href="http://preview.tinyurl.com/6hgur3" rel="nofollow">http://preview.tinyurl.com/6hgur3</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NE</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/11/04/fox-news-has-best-returns-for-minor-party-independent-presidential-candidates/comment-page-1/#comment-562947</link>
		<dc:creator>NE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 04:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4259#comment-562947</guid>
		<description>BTW, you can watch Cindy Sheehan&#039;s results here: http://abcnews.go.com/politics/elections/?category=California

District 8 (0% reporting currently).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, you can watch Cindy Sheehan&#8217;s results here: <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/politics/elections/?category=California" rel="nofollow">http://abcnews.go.com/politics/elections/?category=California</a></p>
<p>District 8 (0% reporting currently).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NE</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/11/04/fox-news-has-best-returns-for-minor-party-independent-presidential-candidates/comment-page-1/#comment-562943</link>
		<dc:creator>NE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 04:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4259#comment-562943</guid>
		<description>BBC has the total national result for â€œothersâ€ (it does not break them down), check out: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/us_elections_2008/7697829.stm

I have not found a site that breaks down the minor parties&#039; and Nader&#039;s vote yet though, unfortunately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BBC has the total national result for â€œothersâ€ (it does not break them down), check out: <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/us_elections_2008/7697829.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/us_elections_2008/7697829.stm</a></p>
<p>I have not found a site that breaks down the minor parties&#8217; and Nader&#8217;s vote yet though, unfortunately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deran</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/11/04/fox-news-has-best-returns-for-minor-party-independent-presidential-candidates/comment-page-1/#comment-562942</link>
		<dc:creator>Deran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 04:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4259#comment-562942</guid>
		<description>The NYT state map of NY state shows 73% of ballots counted, and Nader is only at .5%. Not so exciting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NYT state map of NY state shows 73% of ballots counted, and Nader is only at .5%. Not so exciting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earl</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/11/04/fox-news-has-best-returns-for-minor-party-independent-presidential-candidates/comment-page-1/#comment-562938</link>
		<dc:creator>Earl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 03:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4259#comment-562938</guid>
		<description>The Canadian Broadcasting Company at www.cbc.ca has a simple but useful map with third-party results included. Isn&#039;t it funny how we can&#039;t get any honest returns from the US media?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Canadian Broadcasting Company at <a href="http://www.cbc.ca" rel="nofollow">http://www.cbc.ca</a> has a simple but useful map with third-party results included. Isn&#8217;t it funny how we can&#8217;t get any honest returns from the US media?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/11/04/fox-news-has-best-returns-for-minor-party-independent-presidential-candidates/comment-page-1/#comment-562923</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 03:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4259#comment-562923</guid>
		<description>ah so much for my prediction abilities, looks like Nader is already ahead of Barr in the latest tally.

Nader is not on the ballot in Texas, so thats a state where Barr would gain ground on Nader, and it has some votes left to count, but with California yet to come, I have to think Naders lead is going to stick.

But Baldwin is still at .12%, so far, although Baldwin will do well in Utah, and some states like that, but he&#039;s not on the ballot on the AIP line in California...as far as I know, so I don&#039;t see his numbers changing much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ah so much for my prediction abilities, looks like Nader is already ahead of Barr in the latest tally.</p>
<p>Nader is not on the ballot in Texas, so thats a state where Barr would gain ground on Nader, and it has some votes left to count, but with California yet to come, I have to think Naders lead is going to stick.</p>
<p>But Baldwin is still at .12%, so far, although Baldwin will do well in Utah, and some states like that, but he&#8217;s not on the ballot on the AIP line in California&#8230;as far as I know, so I don&#8217;t see his numbers changing much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

