<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lesson of 2004 and 2008:  Major Parties Perform Better When They Tolerate Minor Party Opposition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/11/04/lesson-of-2004-and-2008-major-parties-perform-better-when-they-tolerate-minor-party-opposition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/11/04/lesson-of-2004-and-2008-major-parties-perform-better-when-they-tolerate-minor-party-opposition/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:53:50 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom McLaughlin</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/11/04/lesson-of-2004-and-2008-major-parties-perform-better-when-they-tolerate-minor-party-opposition/comment-page-1/#comment-563361</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom McLaughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 14:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4260#comment-563361</guid>
		<description>Looks like the Libertarians reclaimed Monor Party status in PA - based on statewide row offices, NOT presidential candidates.  Next year&#039;s statewide signature requirement will most likely be on the top side of 65,000.  We need the Voters choice Act!  State Senator Folmer is still committed to re-introducing it in the 2009 session. (he was not up for election in this cycle)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the Libertarians reclaimed Monor Party status in PA &#8211; based on statewide row offices, NOT presidential candidates.  Next year&#8217;s statewide signature requirement will most likely be on the top side of 65,000.  We need the Voters choice Act!  State Senator Folmer is still committed to re-introducing it in the 2009 session. (he was not up for election in this cycle)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ETJB</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/11/04/lesson-of-2004-and-2008-major-parties-perform-better-when-they-tolerate-minor-party-opposition/comment-page-1/#comment-563359</link>
		<dc:creator>ETJB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 14:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4260#comment-563359</guid>
		<description>Well, I am not sure that is going to convince more Democrats and Republicans to support fair and equitable ballot access laws.

For example, it looks like Democrat Al Franken just lost a very, very, very close US Senate race to Norm Coleman (GOP) with the Independence Party candidate probably making the difference between the two.

I suspect that this will probably hurt my efforts to extend the time period that a MN petition may be circulated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I am not sure that is going to convince more Democrats and Republicans to support fair and equitable ballot access laws.</p>
<p>For example, it looks like Democrat Al Franken just lost a very, very, very close US Senate race to Norm Coleman (GOP) with the Independence Party candidate probably making the difference between the two.</p>
<p>I suspect that this will probably hurt my efforts to extend the time period that a MN petition may be circulated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rationality and Science Education</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/11/04/lesson-of-2004-and-2008-major-parties-perform-better-when-they-tolerate-minor-party-opposition/comment-page-1/#comment-563307</link>
		<dc:creator>Rationality and Science Education</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 14:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4260#comment-563307</guid>
		<description>As reposted on changeformissouri and reformtalk


---Donald Raymond Lake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As reposted on changeformissouri and reformtalk</p>
<p>&#8212;Donald Raymond Lake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
